DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Differences in the Perceptions of PMs and PMOs on the Importance of the Role of PMO

PMO의 제반 역할의 중요성에 대한 PM과 PMO의 인식 차이

  • 윤태호 (한양대학교 경영전문대학원) ;
  • 최성욱 (한양대학교 경영전문대학원) ;
  • 김수연 (한양대학교 경영전문대학원) ;
  • 김대철 (한양대학교 경영전문대학원)
  • Received : 2021.08.09
  • Accepted : 2021.09.15
  • Published : 2021.09.30

Abstract

Recently, the number and scale of projects being carried out within the enterprise are increasing. Accordingly, many companies are competitively introducing a Project Management Office (PMO) to efficiently manage these projects, allocate resources, and effectively link the projects and corporate strategies. However, the project manager who directly manages the project wants to receive support from the PMO in many areas for successful project management, but the project manager does not like to be interfered with by the PMO. On the other hand, the PMO may not be able to satisfy all the requirements of each PM as PMO oversees the entire project with limited resources. In addition, since the PMO must monitor and control the project and support the project according to the priorities of each project, conflicts with each PM can be formed. Therefore, in this study, based on the case of a company, the difference between the perceptions of PMs and PMOs about the importance of the required roles of PMOs is to be examined. As a result of the study, it was confirmed that the core functions and sub-functions of PMO, which PMO members and PMs consider important, are different. It was identified that the PMs valued the PMO function that would be helpful for their successful project execution. On the other hand, PMO members revealed that they had a relatively high priority for the roles to monitor and control project performance for which they were directly responsible.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study has been supported by the Research Fund of Hanyang University (HY-202000000003399).

References

  1. Andersen, B., Henriksen, B., and Aarseth, W., Benchmarking of Project Management Office Establishment: Extracting Best Practices, Journal of Management in Engineering, 2007, Vol. 23. No.2. pp. 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:2(97)
  2. Aubry, M. and Hobbs, B., The Project Management Office (PMO); A Quest for Understanding, PA, USA, PMI, 2010, pp. 1-4.
  3. Bae, J.K., Kim, J.H., and Kim, S.Y., An Exploratory Study on the Project Performance by PMO Capability, The Korea Society of Management Information System, Vol.18, No.1, 2008, pp. 55-77.
  4. Bates, W.S., Improving Project Management: Better Project Management Begins with a Project Management Office, IIE Solutions, Vol. 30, No. 10, 1998, pp. 42-43.
  5. Cha, H.J. and Kim, J.H., An Evaluation Model of Transition PMO Competencies Using RGT and AHP, Journal of the Korea Society of IT Services, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2015, pp. 87-109. https://doi.org/10.9716/KITS.2015.14.2.087
  6. Dai, C.X., The Role of Project Management Office in Achieving Project Success, [Dissertation], [W.DC, USA], George Washington University, 2002.
  7. Dai, C.X. and Wells, W.G., An Exploration of Project Management Office Features and their Relationship to Project Performance, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 22, no. 7, 2004, pp. 523-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.04.001
  8. Hill, G. M., Evolving the Project Management Office a Competency Continuum, Information Systems Management, 2004, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1201/1078/44705.21.4.20040901/84187.6
  9. Kerzner, H., Strategic Planning for a Project Office, Project Management Journal, 2003, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2003, pp. 13- 25. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280303400203
  10. Kim, E.S., An Empirical Study on PMO Affecting the Success of IT Projects, [dissertation]. [Seoul, Korea]: Soongsil University, 2014, pp. 15-30.
  11. Kim, S.B., Study on Influence of PMO person in relation to project success-factor and project results, [dissertation]. [Seoul, Korea]: Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 2016.
  12. Kim, S.B., Kim, J.T., and Chang, B.M., A Comparative Study on Critical Competence Importance of PMO Professional: Using the Fuzzy-AHP, The Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, Vol. 12, No. 7, 2014, pp. 179-198.
  13. Lee, J.B., Kim, J.H., and Kim, S.Y., A Research on the PMO Functions and PMO Management Level to Increase the IS Project Performance, Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2011, pp. 111-129. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2011.9.2.111
  14. Lee, J.S. and Kim, S.K., An Empirical Study on Effects of PMO Governance and Its Influencing Factors, Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2012, pp. 61-83. https://doi.org/10.21219/JITAM.2012.19.1.061
  15. Lee, S.M., Kim, E.H., and Moon, S.C., The Effect of PMO Service and Capability on Project Performance, Journal of ITAM, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2013, pp. 107-132.
  16. Oh, M.J., A study of the impacts of project management office on project portfolio management success, [dissertation]. [Seoul, Korea]: Hanyang University,2018
  17. Oh, S.H. and Kim, S.C., A Study of the Effects of Project Portfolio Management on the Competitive Advantage with Dynamic Capability Theory in the Defense Industry, Global Business Administration Review, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2015, pp. 579-604.
  18. Orwing, R.A., and Brennan, L.L., An Integrated View of Project and Quality Management for Project-Based Organizations, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2000, pp. 351-363. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710010298382
  19. PMI, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 6th ed., PA, USA, Project Management Institute, 2017.
  20. Saaty, T.L., The analytical hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation, New York, USA, Mc Graw Hill, 1980.
  21. The standish group, The standish group chaos report, Project Smart, 2006, https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/white-papers/chaos-report.pdf.
  22. Ward, J.L., Dictionary of Project Management Term, 3rd ed., Virginia, USA, ESI International, 2011.
  23. Ward, J.L., and Daniel, E.M., The Role of Project Management Offices (PMOs) in IS Project Success and Management Satisfaction, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 26, No. 3. 2013, pp. 316-336. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410391311325252