DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic Fragility Evaluation of Inverted T-type Wall with a Backfill Slope Considering Site Conditions

사면 경사도가 있는 뒷채움토와 지반특성을 고려한 역T형 옹벽의 지진시 취약도 평가

  • 서환우 (울산과학기술원 도시환경공학부) ;
  • 김병민 (울산과학기술원 도시환경공학부) ;
  • 박두희 (한양대학교 건설환경공학과)
  • Received : 2020.11.23
  • Accepted : 2021.05.11
  • Published : 2021.10.01

Abstract

Retaining walls have been used to prevent slope failure through resistance of earth pressure in railway, road, nuclear power plant, dam, and river infrastructure. To calculate dynamic earth pressure and determine the characteristics for seismic behavior, many researchers have analyzed the nonlinear response of ground and structure based on various numerical analyses (FLAC, PLAXIS, ABAQUS etc). In addition, seismic fragility evaluation is performed to ensure safety against earthquakes for structures. In this study, we used the FLAC2D program to understand the seismic response of the inverted T-type wall with a backfill slope, and evaluated seismic fragility based on relative horizontal displacements of the wall. Nonlinear site response analysis was performed for each site (S2 and S4) using the seven ground motions to calculate various seismic loadings reflecting site characteristics. The numerical model was validated based on other numerical models, experiment results, and generalized formula for dynamic active earth pressure. We also determined the damage state and damage index based on the height of retaining wall, and developed the seismic fragility curves. The damage probabilities of the retaining wall for the S4 site were computed to be larger than those for the S2 site.

옹벽 구조물은 철도, 도로, 원자력 발전소, 댐, 하천 시설 등 토압 저항을 통한 사면 붕괴방지에 활용된다. 동토압 산정 및 지진시 거동에 대한 특성을 파악하기 위해 많은 연구자들은 다양한 수치해석 프로그램(FLAC, PLAXIS, ABAQUS 등)을 활용하여 동적 하중에 대한 구조물과 지반의 비선형 거동을 분석하고 있다. 또한, 구조물의 지진에 대한 안전성을 확보하기 위해 지진취약도 곡선을 산정하여 확률론적 지진안전성 평가를 수행하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 수치해석프로그램 FLAC2D를 활용하여 뒷채움토의 사면 경사도가 있는 역T형 옹벽의 지진거동 특성을 파악하고, 옹벽 벽체의 상대적인 수평변위를 고려하여 지진취약도 평가를 수행하였다. 다양한 지진하중을 고려하기 위해 암반에서 계측된 7개의 지진파를 활용하여 각 지반특성 별(S2, S4) 비선형 지반응답해석을 수행하였고, 산정된 지진파의 크기를 5가지(0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9 g의 최대지반가속도)로 조정하였다. 본 연구에 활용된 수치해석 모델은 다른 수치해석결과와 실험결과, 주동토압 산정식을 활용하여 비교 검증하였다. 옹벽 높이에 대한 상대수평변위를 손상지수로 고려하여 옹벽의 손상상태를 결정하여 지진취약도 곡선을 산정하였다. 상대적으로 깊고 토층 평균 전단파 속도가 느린 S4 지반에서 S2 지반보다 옹벽 벽체의 수평 변위에 대한 지진취약도가 크게 산정되었음을 확인하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 국토교통부 건설기술연구사업의 연구비지원(20SCIP-B146946-03)에 의해 수행되었습니다. 본 논문은 2020 CONVENTION 논문을 수정·보완하여 작성되었습니다.

References

  1. Argyroudis, S., Kaynia, A. M. and Pitilakis, K. (2013). "Development of fragility functions for geotechnical constructions: Application to cantilever retaining walls." Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 50, pp. 106-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.02.014
  2. Chiou, J. S., Chiang, C. H., Yang, H. H. and Hsu, S. Y. (2011). "Developing fragility curves for a pile-supported wharf." Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 830-840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.01.011
  3. Coulomb, C. A. (1776). "Essay on maximums and minimums of rules to some static problems relating to architecture." Academie Royale Des Sciences, Vol. 7, pp. 343-382 (in French).
  4. Darendeli, M. B. (2001). Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves, Ph.D. Dissertation, Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, USA.
  5. Green, R. A. and Ebeling, R. M. (2002). "Seismic analysis of cantilever retaining walls, Phase I." Earthquake Engineering Research Program, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC, USA.
  6. Green, R. A., Olgun, C. G. and Cameron, W. I. (2008). "Response and modeling of cantilever retaining walls subjected to seismic motions." Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 23, pp. 309-322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2007.00538.x
  7. Hashash, Y. M. A., Musgrove, M. I., Harmon, J. A., Ilhan, O., Xing, G., Groholski, D. R., Phillips, C. A. and Park, D. (2020). DEEPSOIL 7.0, User Manual, Urbana, IL, Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  8. Huang, Y., Hu, H. and Xiong, M. (2019). "Performance-based seismic fragility analysis of retaining walls based on the probability density evolution method." Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1520906
  9. Itasca (2011). FLAC (Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua) user's manual-dynamic analysis, Itasca Consulting Group, Minneapolis, MN.
  10. Jo, S. B., Ha, J. G., Yoo, M. T., Choo, Y. W. and Kim, D. W. (2014). "Seismic behavior of an inverted T-shape flexible retaining wall via dynamic centrifuge tests." Bulleting of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 12, pp. 961-980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9558-9
  11. Kakderi, K. and Pitilakis, K. (2010). "Seismic analysis and fragility curves of gravity waterfront structures." International Conferences on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics.
  12. Kim, J. S., Lim, J. H., Jung, Y. S., Kwon, M. H. (2018). "Seismic fragility evaluation of retaining wall by 2D finite element analysis." Journal of the Korean Society for Advanced Composite Structures, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 21-27 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.11004/kosacs.2018.9.3.021
  13. Kim, W. C., Park, D. and Kim, B. (2010). "Development of a generalised formula for dynamic active earth pressure." Geotechnique, Vol. 60, No. 9, pp. 723-727. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.09.T.001
  14. Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO) (2017). Study on seismic reinforcement plans for existing transmission and distribution cable tunnels and electric facilities around the Yangsan fault (in Korean).
  15. Lee, J. S., Chae, H. G., Kim, D. S., Jo, S. B. and Park, H. J. (2015). "Numerical analysis of inverted T-type wall under seismic loading." Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 66, pp. 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.01.013
  16. Lysmer, J. and Kuhlemeyer, R. L. (1969). "Finite dynamic model for infinite media." Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 95, No. 4, pp. 859-77.
  17. Matasovic, N. (1993). Seismic response of composite horizontally-layered soil deposits, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
  18. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (MOLIT) (2008). Standardized shop drawings of retaining wall (in Korean).
  19. Ministry of Public Safety and Security (MPSS) (2017). Minimum requirements for seismic design, Sejong, Korea (in Korean).
  20. Mononobe, N. and Matsuo, O. (1929). "On the determination of earth pressure during earthquakes." In: Proceeding of the World Engineering Congress, Vol. 9, pp. 179-187.
  21. Okabe, S. (1924). "General theory on earth pressure and seismic stability of retaining walls and dams." Journal of the Japanese Society of Civil Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 1277-1323.
  22. Rankine, W. J. M. (1857). "On the stability of loose earth." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, Vol. 1, pp. 9-27.
  23. Zamiran, S. and Osouli, A. (2018). "Seismic motion response and fragility analyses of cantilever retaining walls with cohesive backfill." Soils and Foundations, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 412-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.02.010