KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Factors Affecting the Acceptance of the Safety Speed 5030 Policy

안전속도 5030 정책수용도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2021.03.10
  • Accepted : 2021.03.31
  • Published : 2021.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, using structural equation modeling, a policy acceptance evaluation model was developed to evaluate the service items of roadsthat affect the acceptance of the Safety Speed 5030 policy. The relationship of influence on policy acceptance was found to be as follows: In the driver group, satisfaction with mobility (0.411), economy (0.217), safety (0.181), and environment (0.089) are in the order of top priority; and in the non-driver group, satisfaction with safety (0.466), mobility (0.223), environment (0.194), and economy (0.111) are in the order of top priority. From these results, in order to increase acceptance of the Safety Speed 5030 policy, it is necessary to differentiate the provision of services according to the characteristics of each road user type. This infers it is important to improve mobility for roads with a high hierarchy mainly used by driver groups, and to improve safety for roads with low hierarchy mainly used by non-driver groups. Therefore, the evaluation model for acceptance of the Safety Speed 5030 policy suggested in this study can be used as basic data for activating the Safety Speed 5030 policy in the future by reflecting the qualitative evaluation of users.

본 연구에서는 구조방정식모형을 활용하여 안전속도 5030 정책수용도에 영향을 미치는 도로서비스 항목을 평가할 수 있는 정책수용도 평가모형을 개발하였다. 그 결과, 정책수용도에 대한 영향관계는 운전자 집단에서 이동성(0.411), 경제성(0.217), 안전성(0.181), 환경성(0.089)의 만족도 순이고, 비운전자 집단에서 안전성(0.466), 이동성(0.223), 환경성(0.194), 경제성(0.111)의 만족도 순으로 나타났다. 이상의 결과에서 알 수 있듯이 안전속도 5030 정책수용도 제고를 위해서는 도로 이용자별 특성에 따라 서비스 제공이 차별화 될 필요가 있다. 즉 운전자 집단이 주로 이용하는 위계가 높은 도로에 대해 이동성을 높이고, 비운전자 집단이 주로 이용하는 위계가 낮은 도로에 대해 안전성을 강화하는 등의 방안마련이 필요함을 말해주고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서 제시한 안전속도 5030 정책의 수용도 평가 모형은 기존의 정책 평가지표인 교통사고 및 통행시간 등에서 벗어나 이용자들의 정성적인 평가를 반영하고 있어 안전속도 5030 정책 활성화의 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Heo, J. (2013). Heo Jun's easily followed amos structure equation model (in Korean).
  2. Jung, H. Y., Kim, S. R. and Jung, J. Y. (1998). A study on the road evaluation of local residents according to road traffic environment, Urban Research Report (in Korean).
  3. Kim, C. R. (2000). Statistical box called SAS Seoul: Data plus (in Korean).
  4. Kim, H. J., Kim, J. H., Lee, C. Y. and Yoon, H. J. (2006). A study on the development and application of traffic service indicators, Korea Institute of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (in Korean).
  5. Kim, H. K. and Shim, J. S. (2012) "An empiric al study on the determinants of regulatory acceptance." Journal of Policy Analysis and Evaluation, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 33-64 (in Korean).
  6. Kim, S. Y. and Kim, S. H. (2016). "Analysis of climate change awareness and determinants of response behavior." Administrative Journal, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 179-206 (in Korean).
  7. Kim, T. H. (2008). Development of pedestrian network service quality evaluation index for sustainable pedestrian environment, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Hanyang (in Korean).
  8. Korea Transport Institute (2007). A study on establishment of evaluation system for urban transportation service level (in Korean).
  9. Kwon, Y. S. (2003). A study on the impact of regulatory reform in road traffic on traffic accidents: focusing on the ease of legal speed limits, Master's Degree, University of Seoul National (in Korean).
  10. Lee, J. Y. (2003). "Evaluation of policy acceptance of the division of pharmaceutical affairs policy: Focusing on the evaluation of policy acceptance securing strategies." Korea Public Administration Association, 2003 Summer Conference Collection (in Korean).
  11. Lee, S. H. (2009). "A study on the sustainability assessment of transportation policy." Seoul Urban Research, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 33-44 (in Korean).
  12. Lee, W. Y., Sung, N. M. and Park, G. S. (2002). "Analysis of speed limit regulation and its effects." Journal of the Korean Society of Social Safety, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 5-16 (in Korean)
  13. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) (2015). 2015 Study on sustainability assessment of transportation logistics system (in Korean).
  14. Park, K. D. (2013). "Acceptance of industrial accidents and prevention policies for industrial accidents." Local Government Research, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 1-22 (in Korean).
  15. Shin, H. M. (2009). A study on the analysis of influencing factors of pedestrian service quality in new urban central areas, Master's Degree, University of Hanyang (in Korean).
  16. Sim, J. S. (2013). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and applications, Bobmunsa, Gyeonggi-do, Korea (in Korean).
  17. Sung, J. W. (2013). "A study on the acceptance factors of smart work policy in the public sector." Journal of the Korean Policy Association, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 331-360 (in Korean).
  18. Won, J. M. and Ha, O. G. (2009). "Development of road network evaluation indicators for residential areas." Seoul Urban Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 3-10 (in Korean).
  19. Yoon, Y. M. (2020). "A comparative study on the traffic effects of speed limit reduction on the urban and provincial roads." The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, Vol. 20, No. 9, pp. 430-438 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.09.430