융합정보논문지 (Journal of Convergence for Information Technology)

중소기업융합학회 (Convergence Society for SMB)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

화장품 품질, 소비자 선호, 조언 및 권유가 구매행동에 미치는 영향관계-지각된 행동통제의 매개효과를 중심으로

The Impact Relationship of Cosmetic Quality, Consumer's Preference, Advice & inducement on Purchasing Behavior-Focused on the Mediating Effect of Perceived Behavior Control

  • 배혜경 (부천대학교 뷰티케어과)
  • 투고 : 2021.09.03
  • 심사 : 2021.10.20
  • 발행 : 2021.10.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

저자는 AMOS 구조방정식 모델링을 통해서, 독립변수인 화장품 관련 변수, 소비자 선호 변수, 조언 및 권유 변수와 종속변수인 구매행동 간의 영향관계에서 지각된 행동통제라는 변수의 매개효과를 검증 하고자 하였다. 잠재변수들 간의 영향관계에서 매개효과를 분석한 결과, 화장품품질 관련요인(CQ)들과 구매행동(PB) 간의 영향관계에서 지각된 행동통제(PBC)는 매개변수로서의 역할을 하는 것으로 나타났다. 저자는 화장품 품질이 좋고, 지각된 행정통제가 클수록 구매행동으로 이어질 수 있음을 알 수 있었다. 이러한 맥락에서, 화장품 품질 개선에 힘쓰는 한편, 구매행동의 자율성이라고 할 수 있는 지각된 행동통제를 늘릴 수 있도록 하는 방안이 모색되어야 한다.

The author tried to verify the mediating effect of the variable, perceived behavioral control, in the relationship between the independent variables(cosmetics-related variables, consumer's preference, advice & inducement), and the dependent variable(purchasing behavior), through AMOS structural equation modeling. As a result of analyzing the mediating effect in the impact relationship between latent variables, it was found that PBC(perceived behavior control) plays a mediating role in the impact relationship between CQ(cosmetics quality) and PB(purchasing behavior). Author found that the higher the quality of cosmetics and the greater the perceived behavior control in domestic cosmetics purchasing behavior, the more likely it will lead to purchasing behavior. In this context, while efforts are being made to improve cosmetic quality, measures to increase perceived behavior control, which can be said to be autonomy in purchasing behavior, should be sought.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. O. S. KO. (2019). Study on the Determinants of Cosmeceutical Purchasing According to Endusers' Consumption Trends : Beauty Interest and Cosmeceutical Recognition. Doctoral's Thesis, Seokyung University, Seoul.
  2. H. J. Jo. (2020). A Study on the Recognition and Purchase Behavior of Customized Cosmetics of Baby Boomers. Master's Thesis, Sukmyung University, Seoul.
  3. J. Y. Kim. (2014). Overseas direct sales 2 trillion won, overseas direct sales 30 billion... Severe reversal of online shopping, Maeil Kyungzae. (Onlione). http://news.mk.co.kr/newsRead.php? year=2014 &no=1447075
  4. H. K. Bae. (2015). A study on the impacting factors upon purchase intent and behavior of imported infant cosmetics : focused on the meditating effect of purchase intent. Master's Thesis, Chungang University, Seoul.
  5. D. L. Hoffman & T. P. Novak. (1996). Marketing in Hypermedia Computermediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations, Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50-68. DOI : 10.1177/002224299606000304
  6. S. Y. Jung. (2009). Research on the effects of the perceived quality on brand image and brand loyalty. Master's Thesis, Kyunghee University, Seoul.
  7. Y. H. Jeong. (2010). An Analysis on the Effects of the Perceived PB Product Quality on the Customer Satisfactions & Loyalty : The Role of Product Familiarity. Master's Thesis, Kyungbok University, Gyeonggi.
  8. C. Y. ZO. (2010). Study on the effects of Korean basal cosmetics to Chinese consumers' buying behavior. Master's Thesis, Cheongju University, Chungbuk.
  9. H. Y. Kim. (2011). Customer satisfaction and perceived quality of the product of the Influence on Repurchase : Focusing on skin care cosmetics. SeoKyung University, Seoul.
  10. L. M. Zhang. (2012). A Study on the Effects of Korean Cosmetics' Quality on Customer Satisfaction and Repurchase Intention. Master's Thesis, Kyonggi University, Gyeonggi.
  11. D. A. Garvin. (1983). Quality on the Line, Harvard Business Review, 61(5), 63-73.
  12. B. B. Gardner & S. J. Levy. (1995). The Product and the Brand. Harvard Business Review, 33, 33-59.
  13. H. E. Cho, I. S. Jeong, E. M. Kim & C. S. Kim. (2014). The Effects of Brand Origin Knowledge and Consumer Characteristics on Purchase Intention of Foreign Products. Journal of Business Research, 14(5), 251-268.
  14. K. M. Min. (2018). The Effect of the Dietary Life Style of Female Consumers on HMR Purchase Behavior - HMR Involvement as Moderating variable. Doctoral's Thesis, Catholic Kwandong University, Kangwon.
  15. T. L. Childers & A. Rao. (1992). The Influence of Familial and Peer-based Reference Groups on Consumer Decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 198-211. DOI : 10.1086/209296
  16. D. Y. Kim. (2018). Study on the Effect that Cognitive and Emotional Assessment of Customized Cosmetic Affect Brand Attitude and Purchase Action Purpos. Master's Thesis, SeoKyung University, Seoul.
  17. W. T. Cai. (2019). The Effect of Motivation for E-Commerce on Purchasing Behavior : Focus on the moderate effect of Platform Trust. Master's Thesis, Kyonggi University, Gyeonggi.
  18. N. Hasbullah, A. J. Mahajar & M. I. Salleh. (2014). A conceptual framework of extending the theory of planned behavior: the role of service quality and trust in the consumer cooperatives, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(12), 142-148.
  19. M. Fishbein. (1963). An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object. Human relations, 16(3), 233-239. DOI : 10.1177/001872676301600302
  20. J. F. Engel, D. T. Kollat & R. D. Blackwell. (1969). Personality measures and market segmentation: Evidence favors interaction view. Business Horizons, 12(3), 61-70. DOI : 10.1016/0007-6813(69)90009-3
  21. S. Y. Lee. (2009). A study on middle aged women's concern of appearance and buying behavior of cosmetics. Master's Thesis, Dongmyung University, Busan.
  22. M. R. Kang. (2019). The Effects of SNS Beauty Information Use of Women in their 20s and 30s on their Cosmetics Purchasing Behavior and Purchase Satisfaction. Master's Thesis, Youngsan University, Busan.
  23. B. R. BAE. (2007). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS 7-Principles and practices, Seoul : Cheongram.
  24. J. H. Steiger. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification : An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(1), 173-180. DOI : 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4