의학교육논단 (Korean Medical Education Review)

  • 제23권3호
  • /
  • Pages.160-167
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2092-5603(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-6370(eISSN)
연세대학교 의과대학 (Yonsei university college of medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

의학교육에서의 에듀테크(EdTech)의 활용과 효과

Applications and Effects of EdTech in Medical Education

  • 홍현미 (제주대학교 의과대학 의과학연구소) ;
  • 김영전 (원광대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실)
  • Hong, Hyeonmi (Institute of Medical Science, Jeju National University) ;
  • Kim, Youngjon (Department of Medical Education, Wonkwang University School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2021.08.11
  • 심사 : 2021.10.12
  • 발행 : 2021.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Rapid developments in technology as part of the Fourth Industrial Revolution have created a demand for educational technology (EdTech) and a gradual transition from traditional teaching and learning to EdTech-assisted learning in medical education. EdTech is a portmanteau (blended word) combining the concepts of education and technology, and it refers to various attempts to solve education-related problems through information and communication technology. The aim of this study was to explore the use of key EdTech applications in medical education programs. A scoping review was conducted by searching three databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and Educational Sources) for articles published from 2000 to June 2021. Twenty-one studies were found that presented relevant descriptions of the effectiveness of EdTech in medical education programs. Studies on the application and effectiveness of EdTech were categorized as follows: (1) artificial intelligence with learner-adaptive evaluation and feedback, (2) augmented/virtual reality for improving learning participation and academic achievement through immersive learning, and (3) social media/social networking services with learner-directed knowledge generation, sharing, and dissemination in medical communities. Although this review reports the effectiveness of EdTech in various medical education programs, the number of studies and the validity of the identified research designs are insufficient to confirm the educational effects of EdTech. Future studies should utilize suitable research designs and examine the instructional objectives achievable by EdTech-based applications to strengthen the evidence base supporting the application of EdTech by medical educators and institutions.

키워드

과제정보

2020년 원광대학교 교내 연구비 지원에 의해 수행되었다.

참고문헌

  1. Marshall AL, Wolanskyj-Spinner A. COVID-19: challenges and opportunities for educators and Generation Z learners. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(6):1135-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.015
  2. Dawidziuk A, Kawka M, Szyszka B, Wadunde I, Ghimire A. Global access to technology-enhanced medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of students in narrowing the gap. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021;9(1):10-4. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00455
  3. Sandhu P, de Wolf M. The impact of COVID-19 on the undergraduate medical curriculum. Med Educ Online. 2020;25(1):1764740. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1764740
  4. Kanneganti A, Sia CH, Ashokka B, Ooi SBS. Continuing medical education during a pandemic: an academic institution's experience. Postgrad Med J. 2020;96(1137):384-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137840
  5. Shahrvini B, Baxter SL, Coffey CS, MacDonald BV, Lander L. Pre-clinical remote undergraduate medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey study. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02445-2
  6. Goh H. Analysis of static and dynamic efficiency for sustainable growth of Edu-Tech companies. J Logist Inform Serv Sci. 2020;7(1):87-101.
  7. Lee HG, Lee JE. A Preliminary study of institutional improvement related to Edu-Tech industry development. Jincheon: National IT Industry Promotion Agency; 2017.
  8. Song S, Lee J, Park T. Educational technology and innovation in Korean higher education: contributions and future directions. J Educ Technol. 2016;32(4):677-705. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.32.4.677
  9. Lee JE. Higher education crisis and opportunity triggered by Edutech. Korean Bus Rev. 2020;24:151-71. https://doi.org/10.17287/kbr.2020.24.0.151
  10. Guze PA. Using technology to meet the challenges of medical education. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2015;126:260-70.
  11. Webster CS. Artificial intelligence and the adoption of new technology in medical education. Med Educ. 2021;55(1):6-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14409
  12. Hanson MD, Eva KW. A reflection upon the impact of early 21st-century technological innovations on medical school admissions. Acad Med. 2019;94(5):640-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002590
  13. Obermeyer Z, Lee TH. Lost in thought: the limits of the human mind and the future of medicine. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(13):1209-11. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1705348
  14. Chan KS, Zary N. Applications and challenges of implementing artificial intelligence in medical education: integrative review. JMIR Med Educ. 2019;5(1):e13930. https://doi.org/10.2196/13930
  15. Barsom EZ, Graafland M, Schijven MP. Systematic review on the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in medical training. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(10):4174-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4800-6
  16. Daudt HM, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-48
  17. Armstrong R, Hall BJ, Doyle J, Waters E. Cochrane update: 'scoping the scope' of a Cochrane review. J Public Health (Oxf). 2011;33(1):147-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdr015
  18. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
  19. Colbert JA, Chokshi DA. Technology in medical education: Osler meets Watson. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(12):1584-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2975-x
  20. Cheng CT, Chen CC, Fu CY, Chaou CH, Wu YT, Hsu CP, et al. Artificial intelligence-based education assists medical students' interpretation of hip fracture. Insights Imaging. 2020;11(1):119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00932-0
  21. Yang YY, Shulruf B. Expert-led and artificial intelligence (AI) system-assisted tutoring course increase confidence of Chinese medical interns on suturing and ligature skills: prospective pilot study. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:7. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.7
  22. Barmaki R, Yu K, Pearlman R, Shingles R, Bork F, Osgood GM, et al. Enhancement of anatomical education using augmented reality: an empirical study of body painting. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12(6):599-609. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1858
  23. Weeks JK, Pakpoor J, Park BJ, Robinson NJ, Rubinstein NA, Prouty SM, et al. Harnessing augmented reality and CT to teach first-year medical students head and neck anatomy. Acad Radiol. 2021;28(6):871-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.07.008
  24. Kucuk S, Kapakin S, Goktas Y. Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: effects on achievement and cognitive load. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(5):411-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1603
  25. Bork F, Stratmann L, Enssle S, Eck U, Navab N, Waschke J, et al. The benefits of an augmented reality magic mirror system for integrated radiology teaching in gross anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12(6):585-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1864
  26. Moro C, Stromberga Z, Raikos A, Stirling A. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(6):549-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1696
  27. Albrecht UV, Folta-Schoofs K, Behrends M, von Jan U. Effects of mobile augmented reality learning compared to textbook learning on medical students: randomized controlled pilot study. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):e182. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2497
  28. Vera AM, Russo M, Mohsin A, Tsuda S. Augmented reality telementoring (ART) platform: a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of a new surgical education technology. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(12):3467-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3625-4
  29. Nomura T, Mamada Y, Nakamura Y, Matsutani T, Hagiwara N, Fujita I, et al. Laparoscopic skill improvement after virtual reality simulator training in medical students as assessed by augmented reality simulator. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015;8(4):408-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12209
  30. Huang CY, Thomas JB, Alismail A, Cohen A, Almutairi W, Daher NS, et al. The use of augmented reality glasses in central line simulation: "see one, simulate many, do one competently, and teach everyone". Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:357-63. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S160704
  31. Rissanen MJ, Kume N, Kuroda Y, Kuroda T, Yoshimura K, Yoshihara H. Asynchronous teaching of psychomotor skills through VR annotations: evaluation in digital rectal examination. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;132:411-6.
  32. Wilson KL, Doswell JT, Fashola OS, Debeatham W, Darko N, Walker TM, et al. Using augmented reality as a clinical support tool to assist combat medics in the treatment of tension pneumothoraces. Mil Med. 2013;178(9):981-5. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00074
  33. Hedman L, Schlickum M, Fellander-Tsai L. Surgical novices randomized to train in two video games become more motivated during training in MIST-VR and GI Mentor II than students with no video game training. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;184:189-94.
  34. Rojas-Munoz E, Cabrera ME, Andersen D, Popescu V, Marley S, Mullis B, et al. Surgical telementoring without encumbrance: a comparative study of see-through augmented reality-based approaches. Ann Surg. 2019;270(2):384-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002764
  35. Botden SM, de Hingh IH, Jakimowicz JJ. Suturing training in augmented reality: gaining proficiency in suturing skills faster. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(9):2131-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0240-2
  36. Sanders AJ, Luursema JM, Warntjes P, Mastboom WJ, Geelkerken RH, Klaase JM, et al. Validation of open-surgery VR trainer. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;119:473-6.
  37. Bahner DP, Adkins E, Patel N, Donley C, Nagel R, Kman NE. How we use social media to supplement a novel curriculum in medical education. Med Teach. 2012;34(6):439-44. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.668245
  38. Newall N, Smith BG, Burton O, Chari A, Kolias AG, Hutchinson PJ, et al. Improving neurosurgery education using social media case-based discussions: a pilot study. World Neurosurg X. 2021;11:100103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wnsx.2021.100103
  39. Shakoori TA, Mahboob U, Strivens J, Willis I. Impact of a social media group page on undergraduate medical physiology learning. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2017;27(7):409-13.
  40. Cabrera LF, Ferrada P, Mayol J, Mendoza AC, Herrera G, Pedraza M, et al. Impact of social media on the continuous education of the general surgeon, a new experience, @Cirbosque: a Latin American example. Surgery. 2020;167(6):890-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2020.03.008
  41. Jackson HT, Young MT, Rodriguez HA, Wright AS. SAGES Foregut Surgery Masters Program: a surgeon's social media resource for collaboration, education, and professional development. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(6):2800-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5983-1
  42. Hsieh JG, Kuo LC, Wang YW. Learning medical professionalism: the application of appreciative inquiry and social media. Med Educ Online. 2019;24(1):1586507. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1586507
  43. Brown A, Jauregui J, Ilgen JS, Riddell J, Schaad D, Strote J, et al. Does the medium matter?: evaluating the depth of reflective writing by medical students on social media compared to the traditional private essay using the REFLECT Rubric. West J Emerg Med. 2019;21(1):18-25. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.11.44263
  44. Awan ZA, Awan AA, Alshawwa L, Tekian A, Park YS. Assisting the integration of social media in problem-based learning sessions in the Faculty of Medicine at King Abdulaziz University. Med Teach. 2018;40(sup1):S37-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1465179
  45. Rivas JG, Socarras MR, Patruno G, Uvin P, Esperto F, Dinis PJ, et al. Perceived role of social media in urologic knowledge acquisition among young urologists: a European survey. Eur Urol Focus. 2018;4(5):768-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2016.11.010
  46. Hsieh JG, Kuo LC, Wang YW. Learning medical professionalism: the application of appreciative inquiry and social media. Med Educ Online. 2019;24(1):1586507. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1586507
  47. George DR, Dreibelbis TD, Aumiller B. How we used two social media tools to enhance aspects of active learning during lectures. Med Teach. 2013;35(12):985-8. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.818631
  48. George DR, Dellasega C. Use of social media in graduate-level medical humanities education: two pilot studies from Penn State College of Medicine. Med Teach. 2011;33(8):e429-34. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.586749
  49. Bissonnette V, Mirchi N, Ledwos N, Alsidieri G, Winkler-Schwartz A, Del Maestro RF, et al. Artificial intelligence distinguishes surgical training levels in a virtual reality spinal task. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(23):e127 https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.01197
  50. Mirchi N, Bissonnette V, Yilmaz R, Ledwos N, Winkler-Schwartz A, Del Maestro RF. The Virtual Operative Assistant: an explainable artificial intelligence tool for simulation-based training in surgery and medicine. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0229596. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229596
  51. Botden SM, Buzink SN, Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference?: a comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator. World J Surg. 2007;31(4):764-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0724-y
  52. Kugelmann D, Stratmann L, Nuhlen N, Bork F, Hoffmann S, Samarbarksh G, et al. An augmented reality magic mirror as additive teaching device for gross anatomy. Ann Anat. 2018;215:71-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2017.09.011
  53. Muangpoon T, Haghighi Osgouei R, Escobar-Castillejos D, Kontovounisios C, Bello F. Augmented reality system for digital rectal examination training and assessment: system validation. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e18637. https://doi.org/10.2196/18637
  54. Rochlen LR, Levine R, Tait AR. First-person point-of-view-augmented reality for central line insertion training: a usability and feasibility study. Simul Healthc. 2017;12(1):57-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000185
  55. Sandars J, Patel RS, Goh PS, Kokatailo PK, Lafferty N. The importance of educational theories for facilitating learning when using technology in medical education. Med Teach. 2015;37(11):1039-42. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2015.1019438