DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of the Lap Splice Strengths of High Strength Headed Bars by Flexural Tests of RC Beams

RC 보의 휨실험을 통한 고강도 확대머리철근의 겹침이음 강도 평가

  • 이지형 (한밭대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 장덕영 (한밭대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 김승훈 (한밭대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2022.11.30
  • Accepted : 2022.12.07
  • Published : 2022.12.31

Abstract

In this paper, a bending test was conducted on beams with two lap splice details when the effective depth of tensile high strength headed bars overlapped is the same and different. Through bending test, the lap splice performance of the high-strength headed bars was evaluated, and the applicability of the KDS-2021 design formula was evaluated. In the LS specimens with lap splice details where the high strength bars had the same effective depth, all specimens with 1.3 times or more of the development length of the KDS-2021 equation and 1 times or more of the ACI318-19 had the flexural failure mode after the ductile behavior to ensure sufficient lap splice performance. For specimens with details of lap joints between headed bars with different effective depth, when lap splice length is calculated by the KDS-2021 formula, the flexural stress may be transmitted so that the flexural strength at the cross section with the large effective depth and the cross section with the small effective depth becomes similar.

본 논문에서는 겹침이음되는 고강도 확대머리철근의 유효춤이 동일한 경우와 상이한 경우의 겹침이음상세를 가지는 보에 대하여 휨실험을 실시하였다. 이를 통하여 고강도 확대머리철근의 겹침이음성능을 평가하였고, KDS-2021 설계식의 적용성을 평가하였다. 실험 변수는 철근의 설계기준항복강도, 겹침이음길이, 스터럽 간격, 서로 겹침되는 철근간의 중심간격 등이다. LS 계열 실험체에 대한 ACI 318-19식이 KDS-2021식과 비교하여 약 23.8~32.7% 더 큰 정착길이를 나타내었으며, VLS 계열 실험체에서는 약 13.7~35.5% 더 큰 정착길이로 평가하고 있다. 유효춤이 동일한 확대머리 철근의 겹침이음실험에서 KDS-2021식의 1.3배 이상, ACI318-19식의 1배 이상의 겹침이음길이를 가지는 실험체는 모두 연성적인 거동 후 휨파괴되어 충분한 겹침이음성능을 확보하였다. 유효춤이 상이한 철근간에 겹침이음되는 상세를 가지는 실험체는 KDS-2021식으로 겹침이음길이를 산정할 경우, 유효춤이 적은 측의 철근강도를 증가시킴으로써 유효춤이 큰 단면의 보유휨강도와 유사하도록 휨응력을 전달시킬 수 있다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 한국연구재단 지역대학우수과학자지원사업(과제번호: NRF-2020R1I1A3074602)의 연구비 지원에 의해 수행한 이지형(2022)의 석사학위논문내용의 일부임을 알립니다.

References

  1. ACI Committee 318 (2019), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary. Far-mington Hills, MI; American Concrete Institute (ACI).
  2. Chun, S. C., and Lee, J. G. (2013), Strengths of Lap Splices Anchored by SD600 Headed Bars, Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, 25(2), 217-224. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2013.25.2.217
  3. Chun, S. C., Choi, C. S., and Jung, H. S. (2017), Side-Face Blowout Failure of Large-Diameter High-Strength Headed Bars in Beam-Column Joints. ACI Structural Journal, 114(1), 1-12.
  4. KCI Committee. (2012), Concrete Design Code and Commentary, Korea Concrete Institute.
  5. Korea Construction Standards Center (2021), Korean Design Standard (KDS). Seoul, Korea; KDS 14 20 00;2021.
  6. KS B 0802. (2018), Method of tensile test for metallic materials, Korean Agency for Technology and Standards.
  7. KS F 2405. (2017), Standard test method for compressive of concrete, Korean Agency for Technology and Standards.
  8. Lee, J. H., Kim, S. H.(2021), Evaluation of Structural Performance of RC Beam with Different Depths to Lap Splice Detail of SD700 Headed Bar, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintance and Inspection, 25(6), 262-269.
  9. Lee, J. H.(2021), RC Member Joint Details with Lap Splice of SD700 Headed Rebar, Master's Degree Dissertation, Hanbat National University, Department of Architectural Engineering.
  10. Sim, H. J., Chun, S. C.(2018), A Reevaluation of Anchorage Strength of Headed Bars in Exterior Beam-Column Joints, Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, 30(2), 207-216. https://doi.org/10.4334/jkci.2018.30.2.207
  11. Thompson, M. K., Jirsa, J. O., and Breen, J. E.(2006), Behavior and Capacity of Headed Reinforcement, ACI Structural Journal, 103(4), 522-530.