Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Research Trends in Information Literacy Education Using Keyword Network Analysis and Topic Modeling

키워드 네트워크 분석과 토픽모델링을 활용한 정보활용교육 연구 동향 분석

  • Received : 2022.11.13
  • Accepted : 2022.12.11
  • Published : 2022.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the flow of domestic information literacy education research using keyword network analysis and topic modeling and to explore the direction of information literacy education in the future. For this reason, 306 academic papers related to information literacy education published in academic journals of the library and information science field in Korea were chosen. And through the preprocessing process for abstracts of the paper, total keyword appearance frequency, keyword appearance frequency by period, and keyword simultaneous occurrence frequency were analyzed. Subsequently, keyword network analysis analyzed the degree centrality, between centrality, and eigenvector centrality of keywords. Using structural topic modeling analysis, 15 topics -curriculum, information literacy effect, contents of information literacy education, school library education, information media literacy, information literacy ability evaluation index, library anxiety, public library program, health information literacy ability, digital divide, library assisted instruction improvement, research trend, information literacy model, and teacher role-were derived. In addition, the trend of topics by year was analyzed to confirm the change in relative weight by topic. Based on these results, the direction of information literacy education and the suggestions for follow-up research were presented.

본 연구는 키워드 네트워크 분석과 토픽모델링을 활용하여 국내 정보활용교육 연구의 흐름을 살펴보고 향후 정보활용교육의 방향성을 모색하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위하여 국내 문헌정보학 분야의 학술지에 게재된 정보활용교육과 관련된 논문 306편을 선정하고, 논문의 초록을 대상으로 전처리 과정을 거쳐 전체 키워드 출현 빈도, 시기별 키워드 출현 빈도, 키워드 동시출현 빈도분석을 수행하였다. 이어서 키워드 네트워크 분석을 통해 키워드의 연결중심성과 매개중심성, 위세중심성을 분석하였다. 또한 구조적 토픽모델링 분석을 활용하여 15개의 토픽(교육과정, 정보활용교육 효과, 정보활용교육 내용, 학교도서관 교육, 정보매체활용, 정보활용능력 평가 지표, 도서관 불안, 공공도서관 프로그램, 대학도서관 이용자교육, 건강정보 활용능력, 정보격차, 도서관활 용수업 개선, 연구 동향, 정보활용교육 모델, 교사 역할)을 도출하고, 토픽별로 비중의 변화를 확인하기 위해 연도별 토픽 추이를 분석하였다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 정보활용교육의 방향성과 후속 연구에 대한 제언을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chang, Duk-Hyun & Choi, Go-Un (2008). A study on the development of information literacy instruction for university libraries. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 19(1), 37-60. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2008.19.1.037
  2. Cho, Mi-Ah (2007). A study on application of information literacy education of public library connected lifelong education. Journal of Korean Library and Information Society, 38(4), 187-213. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.38.4.200712.187
  3. Choi, IlYoung, Lee, YongSung, & Kim, JaeKyeong (2010). A usage pattern analysis of the academic database using social network analysis in K university library. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(10), 25-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2010.27.1.025
  4. Chung, Jaeyoung (2015), A study on developing the curriculum of information literacy education for college students. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(3), 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2015.32.3.001
  5. Hyun, Kisoon Hyun (2022). Research trends on sustainability in geography: using topic modeling and keyword network analysis. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 57(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.22776/kgs.2021.57.1.1
  6. Jang, SuHyun & Nam, YoungJoon (2022). A study on the research trends on literacy in library and information science. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 39(3), 263-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2022.39.3.263
  7. Jung, Young-Mi (2009). Information literacy education and the impact of self awareness on information literacy and libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 43(4), 265-280. http://doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2009.43.4.265
  8. Kim, Byeongsun, Jeong, Minwoo, Jeon, Sangeum, & Shin, Dongbin (2015). Global research trends on geospatial information by keyword network analysis. Spatial Information Research, 23(1), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.12672/ksis.2015.23.1.069
  9. Kim, Eunjung & Kim, Jinsook (2021). The trend analysis of college students emotion research using keyword network analysis and topic modeling. Korea Journal of Counseling, 22(2), 25-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.15703/kjc.22.2.202104.25
  10. Kim, Ji-Eun (2011). A study on the development of the information literacy curriculum model for undergraduates based on kuhlthau's information search process(ISP) model. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 22(2), 101-122. http://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2011.22.2.101
  11. Kim, Seunghee & Hong, Sehee (2016). Meta-analysis on the effect of information literacy instruction. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 27(1), 59-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2016.27.1.059
  12. Kim, Soojung (2015). Research trends of information literacy instruction in the library and information science field. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 26(3), 207-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2015.26.3.207
  13. Kim, Sung-Jun (2011). A study on the development of information literacy textbook, school library and information literacy. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(3), 271-292. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.3.201109.271
  14. Kwahk, Kee-Young (2019). Social Network Analysis (2nd ed.). Seoul: Chungram.
  15. Lee Min-Soo & Kim, Hea-Jin (2022). Comparative study of information literacy education and librarian teacher evaluation index in teachers' competency development evaluation. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 53(3), 455-477. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.53.3.202209.455
  16. Lee, Byeong-Ki (2011). A study on the developmental tools of performance task for information literacy instruction. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(4), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.4.201112.31
  17. Lee, Byeong-Ki (2012). Information Literacy Instruction. Seoul: Joeungeulteo.
  18. Lee, Changbong, Yun, Young, & Han, Seungkyu (2021). Trends in literacy research using topic modeling and network analysis. The Korean Journal of Literacy Research, 12(6), 121-163. https://doi.org/10.37736/kjlr.2021.12.12.6.05
  19. Lee, Seung-Gil (2006). A study on the information literacy of public library in elementary school students. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 40(4), 63-83. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.4.063
  20. Lee, Soo-Sang (2014). Network Analysis Methods. Seoul: NonHyung.
  21. Lee, Soo-Sang (2018). Application and Limitations of Network Analysis Methods. Seoul: Chungram.
  22. Lim, Jeong-Hoon, Lee, Seungmin, Kang, Bongsuk, & Lee, Byeongki (2021). A study on priority of teacher librarians' competencies using AHP (analytic hierarchy process). Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(2), 127-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.52.2.202106.127
  23. Min, Yohan, Kim, Gi-Young, & Park, Oknam (2021). The trend analysis of 'cultural contents' research using topic modeling and keyword network analysis. Journal of Social Science, 32(3), 113-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.16881/jss.2021.04.32.2.113
  24. Moon, Young-Joo (2020). An analysis of trends in researches on the open recruitment system for principals based on topic modeling and keyword network analysis. Journal of Education & Culture, 26(1), 217-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.24159/joec.2020.26.1.217
  25. Park, Juhyeon, Kang, Bong-suk, & Lee, ByeongKi (2021). A study on the development of curriculum content structure for information literacy education. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(1), 229-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.52.1.202103.229
  26. Seo, Man-Deok & Nam, Young-Joon (2010). A research on the trend of quantitative research through the analysis of master's and doctoral dissertations of information literacy. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(4), 309-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.4.309
  27. Song, Gi-Ho & Kim, Tae-Soo (2008). A study of the thematically integrated information literacy curriculum for strengthening its relationship with curricula. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25(3), 41-64. http://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2008.25.3.041
  28. 日本 文部科学省 (2015). 司書教諭 と 学校司書 及び 司書 に関する制度上の比較. 出典: https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/dokusho/sisyo/1360933.htm
  29. American Association of School Librarians & Association for Educational Communications and Technology (1998). Information Power: Building Partnerships for Learning. Chicago and London: American Association of School Librarians.
  30. American Association of School Librarians (2007). Standards for the 21st Century Learner. Chicago: American Asoociation of School Librarians.
  31. American Association of School Librarians (2018). National School Library Standards for Learners, School Librarians, and School Libraries. Chicago: American Association of School Librarians.
  32. American Library Associatoin Presidential Committee on Information Literacy (1989). Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report. Available: https://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential
  33. Association of College & Research Libraries (2000). Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Chicago, Illinois: Association of College & Research Libraries.
  34. Bagozzi, B. E. & Berliner, D. (2018). The politics of scrutiny in human rights monitoring: evidence from structural topic models of US State Department human rights reports. Political Science Research and Methods, 6(4), 661-677. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2016.44
  35. Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77-84. http://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826
  36. Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: a family of measures. American journal of sociology, 92(5), 1170-1182. http://doi.org/10.1086/228631
  37. Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks, 1(3), 215-239. http://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
  38. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (2015). IFLA School Library Guidelines. Hague, Netherlands: The International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions.
  39. Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Airoldi, E. M. (2016). A model of text for experimentation in the social sciences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111(515), 988-1003. http://10.1080/01621459.2016.1141684
  40. Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Tingley, D. (2019). stm: an r package for structural topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 10(2), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v091.i02
  41. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2013). Global Media and Information Literacy Assessment Framework: Country Readiness And Competencies. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.