한국융합학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Convergence Society)

  • 제13권2호
  • /
  • Pages.235-248
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2233-4890(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6353(eISSN)
한국융합학회 (Korea Convergence Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

AHP-TOPSIS 방법에 기초한 부모-자식 인터랙티브 게임 가구의 설계 평가

Design Evaluation of Parent-child Interactive Game Furniture Based on AHP-TOPSIS Method

  • 왕가기 (국민대학교 테크노디자인전문대학원 스마트경험디자인학과) ;
  • 반영환 (국민대학교 테크노디자인전문대학원 스마트경험디자인학과)
  • Wang, Jiaqi (Department of Smart Experience Design, TED, Kookmin University) ;
  • Pan, Younghwan (Department of Smart Experience Design, TED, Kookmin University)
  • 투고 : 2021.12.29
  • 심사 : 2022.02.20
  • 발행 : 2022.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

부모-자식 인터랙티브 게임 가구에 기초한 설계지표의 연구는 설계사들이 관련 상품의 설계의 장단점을 정량적으로 분석할 수 있게 하여 설계의 질을 관리하고 향상하는데 긍정적인 도움이 된다. 본 연구에서는 AHP와 TOPSIS를 결합하여 3가지 설계기준과 26가지 설계지수의 평가모델을 제안하였다. 각 지표에 대한 전문가들의 채점, 계산 및 일관성 테스트를 거쳐 각 설계지표의 가중치를 얻어낸 다음 각 지표의 중요정도에 따라 지표분류를 진행하였다. 분류결과 설계지표들을 8개의 중요지표와 11개의 보조지표, 7개의 일반지표로 분류하였다. 사례 연구에서는 TOPIS를 이용하였다. 세 종의 부모-자식 등반 게임 가구의 디자인 표본을 분석해 본 결과 세 표본의 상대 근접도는 최종적으로 각각 0.505, 0281 및 0.640 이였다. 연구를 통하여 AHP-TOPSIS 방법이 설계방안의 장단점을 과학적으로 효과적으로 분류 및 선별하고 관련 제품의 연구 및 개발에 참고를 제공할 수 있는 아주 유용한 방법이라는 것이 밝혀졌다.

Through the research on the design evaluation index of parent-child interactive game furniture, it is convenient for designers to quantitatively analyze the design advantages and disadvantages of related products, which is of positive help to control and improve the design quality. Combined with AHP and TOPSIS, this study proposes the evaluation model of three design criteria and 26 design indexes. After expert scoring, calculation, and consistency test of each index, the weight value of each design index is obtained, and the index is classified according to the importance of each index. Finally, eight essential indicators, eleven secondary indicators, and seven general indicators are classified. A case study was conducted with TOPSIS, and the design samples of three parent-child climbing game furniture were analyzed. Finally, the three samples' relative proximity was 0.505, 0281, and 0.640, respectively. The research shows that the AHP-TOPSIS method can scientifically and effectively sort and screen the advantages and disadvantages of design schemes and provide a reference for the research and development of related products.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. J. L.Frost, S. C. Wortham & S. Reifel. (2004). Play and Child Development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  2. W. Y. Jiang & Y. F. Miao. (2021). Application of Preschool Play Theory in Children's Play Furniture Design. Furniture, 42(1), 44-47. DOI : 10.16610/j.cnki.jiaju.2021.01.010
  3. W. X. Jin. (2018). Research on furniture product design based on Parent-child interaction experience, Master's dissertation, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan.
  4. Z. J. Chen, S. L. Jiang & H. Y. Guan. (2010). Evaluation Model of Furniture Design Scheme Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 46(12), 130-136. DOI : 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20101222
  5. T. Saaty & L. G. Vargas. (2012). How to Make A Decision. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 175, 1-21. DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6_1
  6. S. B. Xu. (1988). Principles of Analytic Hierarchy Process. Tianjin: Tianjin University Press.
  7. C. L. Hwang & K. Yoon. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag. DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
  8. S. Bathrinath, R.K.A. Bhalaji & S. Saravanasankar. (2020). Risk Analysis in Textile Industries Using AHP-TOPSIS. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45(2), 1257-1263. DOI : 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.722
  9. L. J. Wang, Y. Ali, S. Nazir & M. Niazi. (2020). ISA Evaluation Framework for Security of Internet of Health Things System Using AHP-TOPSIS Methods, IEEE Access, 8, 152316-152332. DOI : 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221
  10. X. Wang & Q. Q. Duan. (2019). Improved AHP-TOPSIS Model for The Comprehensive Risk Evaluation of Oil and Gas Pipelines. Petroleum Science, 16,1479-1492. DOI : 10.1007/s12182-019-00365-5
  11. N. Li, X. D. Li & D. F. Tang. (2020). Selection of the Best Sustainable Packaging Design Scheme Based on AHP-TOPSIS, Packaging Engineering, 41(23), 242-248. DOI : 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2020.23.034.
  12. M. Sharma & S. Joshi. (2019). Brand Sustainability Among Young Consumers: An AHP-TOPSIS Approach, Young Consumers, 20(4), 314-337. DOI : 10.1108/yc-12-2018-0914
  13. Y. F. Chen. (2019). Research on Design and Evaluation of Xiamen Tourist Souvenirs Based on AHP-TOPSIS, Master's dissertation, Jinan:Qilu University of Technology.
  14. R. Lukic et al. (2020). Analyzing Financial Performances and Efficiency of The Retail Food in Serbia By Using The AHP-TOPSIS Method, Economics of Agriculture, 67(1), 55-68. DOI : 10.5937/ekopolj2001055l
  15. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. (2008). General safety technical specification for children's furniture SN_T 2144-2008. Beijing.
  16. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. (2008). General technical requirements for children's furniture GB 28007-2011. Beijing.
  17. J. Y. Zhu & Q. Wu. (2020). Furniture Design Based on Parent-Child Interaction Experience. 2020 International Conference on Environment and Water Resources Engineering (EWRE 2020). DOI : 10.1051/e3sconf/202017902098
  18. Y. F. Miao, L. Xu & L. Q. Shen. (2017). Children Furniture Design Based on Parent-child Interaction. China Forest Products Industry, 44(8), 42-46. DOI : 10.19531/j.issn1001-5299.201708010
  19. C. Yang & N. Li. (2016). Analysis On The Key Points of Parent-Child Interactive Furniture Design. Design, 24, 138-140. DOI : 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0069.2016.24.047
  20. D. A. Norman. (2004). Emotional Design:Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
  21. Y. Hu & K. M. Huang. (2020). Street Furniture Design Evaluation Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process. Packaging Engineering, 41(22), 330-334. DOI : 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2020.22.053
  22. D. A. Norman. (1988). The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.