대한약침학회지 (Journal of Pharmacopuncture)

  • 제25권1호
  • /
  • Pages.15-23
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2093-6966(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6856(eISSN)
대한약침학회 (KOREAN PHARMACOPUNCTURE INSTITUTE)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Development of a Model for Providing Traditional Korean Medicine and Welfare Services for Community Care

  • Lee, Eun-Jin (Department of Policy Development, National Development Institute of Korean Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Hee-Jung (Department of Policy Development, National Development Institute of Korean Medicine) ;
  • Oh, Danny (Graduate School of Social Welfare, Soongsil University) ;
  • Park, Jung-Youn (Department of Health and Welfare, Yuhan University) ;
  • Kim, Dongsu (College of Korean Medicine, Dongshin University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Nam (Department of Qigong, College of Korean Medicine, Daegu Haany University) ;
  • Lee, Gihyun (College of Korean Medicine, Dongshin University) ;
  • Lee, Ji-Yeon (National Agency for Development of Innovative technologies in Korean Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Kyeong Han (Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Woosuk University) ;
  • Sung, Soo-Hyun (Department of Policy Development, National Development Institute of Korean Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2021.10.02
  • 심사 : 2021.12.13
  • 발행 : 2022.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: This study aims to develop a community care model in traditional Korean medicine (TKM) by developing a community care participation model for the health of the elderly and deriving tasks to implement it. Methods: This study implemented a group interview with experts. A fact-finding survey was conducted targeting 16 local governments that are implementing a leading project to identify the status of TKM service provision and welfare service linkage in all regions. An expert group interview (FGI) targeted public and private sector experts for each job role, the former represented by those in charge of the central government's health care policy and administrative delivery system, and the latter by professors majoring in social welfare, professors majoring in health, and local TKM societies. After forming the expert groups, three expert group interviews were conducted. Results: Through collective interviews with experts, a model for providing TKM and welfare services in community integrated care was derived by dividing it into local and central government levels. The strategies and tasks for promoting TKM-oriented health welfare services were derived from 3 strategies, 8 tasks, and 20 detailed tasks. Conclusion: The core direction of the TKM health care model is the region-centered provision of TKM and welfare services. To this end, policy support for the use and linkage of health care service resources is required at the central government level, and linkage and provision of health welfare services centered on TKM are necessary through linkage and convergence between service subjects and between government health care projects.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the Project of Traditional Korean Medicine Community Care Monitoring and Evaluation funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare.

참고문헌

  1. Bookman A. Innovative models of aging in place: transforming our communities for an aging population. Community Work Fam. 2008;11(4):419-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800802362334
  2. Statistics Korea. 2019 elderly person statistics. Daejeon: Statistics Korea; 2019.
  3. Chappell NL, Hollander M. An evidence-based policy prescription for an aging population. Healthc Pap. 2011;11(1):8-18. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpap.2011.22246
  4. Denton FT, Spencer BG. Chronic health conditions: changing prevalence in an aging population and some implications for the delivery of health care services. Can J Aging. 2010;29(1):11-21. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0714980809990390
  5. Kim WJ. A study on the revitalization of in-home community health plans through the development of an integrated service model of health and welfare. Korean J Local Gov Adm Stud. 2012;26(2):245-61.
  6. Chan MF, Wong FK. The risk factors for hospital re-admission in medical patients in Singapore. Health Soc Care Community. 2014;22(5):488-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12108
  7. Kim EJ, Song HJ, Sun BO, Bae HJ, Choi JH, Kim SJ, et al. A study on policy for low fertility and aging from the perspective of gender equality. Seoul: Korean Women's Development Institute; 2020.
  8. Kim SH. A qualitative study on the admission motivation and needs of social hospitalization patients: focused on inpatients of convalescent hospital [master's thesis]. [Asan]: Soonchunhyang University; 2014.
  9. Roh YK, Sun WD, Yoon J, Won C, Lee D, Lee D, et al. A study on the role of nursing homes and nursing hospitals for the elderly. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare, The Korean Geriatrics Society; 2010.
  10. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Community care basic plan: centered on community care for the elderly. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2018.
  11. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Community care guidebook. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2020.
  12. Murakawa H, Murata M. Societal changes and establishment of local comprehensive care system in Japan - reform of the longterm care insurance program and future of elderly welfare service. J Soc Policy Soc Work. 2011;15:5-24.
  13. Tsutsui T. Implementation process and challenges for the community-based integrated care system in Japan. Int J Integr Care. 2014;14:e002. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.988
  14. Iwagami M, Tamiya N. The long-term care insurance system in Japan: past, present, and future. JMA J. 2019;2(1):67-9. https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2018-0015
  15. Carpenter I, Gambassi G, Topinkova E, Schroll M, Finne-Soveri H, Henrard JC, et al. Community care in Europe. The aged in home care project (AdHOC). Aging Clin Exp Res. 2004;16(4):259-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324550
  16. Bywaters P, McLeod E, Fisher J, Cooke M, Swann G. Good intentions, increased inequities: developing social care services in Emergency Departments in the UK. Health Soc Care Community. 2011;19(5):460-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.00988.x
  17. Cangiano A, Shutes I. Ageing, demand for care and the role of migrant care workers in the UK. J Popul Ageing. 2010;3(1):39-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-010-9031-3
  18. Lindqvist R, Lundalv J. Activation, medicalisation and interorganisational cooperation in health insurance - implications for frontline social work in Sweden. Eur J Soc Work. 2018;21(4):616-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2017.1293010
  19. Sung SH, Park M, Kim J, Jeon SW, Sung AD, Lee EJ, et al. Current status of traditional Korean medicine services in public sector: a study for integrating traditional Korean medicine into community care system. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(5):493.
  20. Morgan DL. Focus groups. Annu Rev Sociol. 1996;22:129-52. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
  21. Vaughn S, Schumm JS, Sinagub J. Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 1996.
  22. Park SY. A study on depression, ADL, IADL, and QOL among community-dwelling, low income elderly. J Korean Acad Public Health Nurs. 2009;23(1):78-90.
  23. Calo F, Roy MJ, Donaldson C, Teasdale S, Baglioni S. Exploring the contribution of social enterprise to health and social care: a realist evaluation. Soc Sci Med. 2019;222:154-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.007
  24. Cho YM, Ryu MH, Jeoung DU, Sok SH. Effects of oriental nursing intervention program for health promotion of the elderly in the community. J Korea Contents Assoc. 2020;20(2):394-404. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.02.394
  25. Kim KN, Hwang WW, Cho SH. Effects of Korean medical intensive treatment program on geriatric depression disorder. J Orient Neuropsychiatry. 2014;25(4):311-8. https://doi.org/10.7231/JON.2014.25.4.311
  26. Chon Y. The use and coordination of the medical, public health and social care services for the elderly in terms of continuum of care. Health Soc Welf Rev. 2018;38(4):10-39. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2018.38.4.10
  27. Kwon CY, Lee B, Chung SY, Kim JW. Results of the Korean medicine visiting care service for solitary elderly in a public health center. J Orient Neuropsychiatry. 2019;30(2):47-58. https://doi.org/10.7231/JON.2019.30.2.047
  28. Kim YD. Deinstitutionalization and building community-based personal social services: community care that connects independence and interdependence. Health Soc Welf Rev. 2018;38(3):492-520. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2018.38.3.492
  29. Meyer C, Appannah A, McMillan S, Browning C, Ogrin R. 'One size does not fit all': perspectives on diversity in community aged care. Australas J Ageing. 2018;37(4):268-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.12534
  30. Joling KJ, van Eenoo L, Vetrano DL, Smaardijk VR, Declercq A, Onder G, et al. Quality indicators for community care for older people: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0190298. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190298
  31. Cardona B. Measuring outcomes of community aged care programs: challenges, opportunities and the Australian Community Outcomes Measurement ACCOM tool. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-0918-7