DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relationship of the maxillary posterior teeth and maxillary sinus floor in different skeletal growth patterns: A cone-beam computed tomographic study of 1600 roots

  • Shrestha, Biken (Department of Stomatology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University) ;
  • Shrestha, Rachana (Department of Implant Dentistry, Guanghua Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University) ;
  • Lu, Hongfei (Department of Stomatology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University) ;
  • Mai, Zhihui (Department of Stomatology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University) ;
  • Chen, Lin (Department of Stomatology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University) ;
  • Chen, Zheng (Department of Stomatology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University) ;
  • Ai, Hong (Department of Stomatology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University)
  • Received : 2021.06.11
  • Accepted : 2021.10.18
  • Published : 2022.03.31

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the distance from the posterior root apices to the maxillary sinus floor (MSF) and the frequency of roots touching or protruding through the MSF using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: This study included 100 subjects divided into different vertical and anteroposterior skeletal growth patterns. On CBCT images, the distance from the posterior root apices to MSF was measured and the frequency of roots touching or protruding through the MSF was evaluated using NNT software (version 5.3.0.0; ImageWorks, Elmsford, NY, USA). Results: No statistically significant differences were found in the distance from the posterior root apices to the MSF among vertical skeletal groups (P>0.05). The palatal roots of the first molar and the palatal, mesio-buccal and disto-buccal roots of the second molars had significantly less distance from MSF in skeletal class II than in class III (P<0.05). The high-angle group had the highest frequencies of roots touching or protruding into the maxillary sinus (49.8%); the lowest proportion of these roots was found in skeletal class III (28.3%) and the highest proportion in class II (50.3%). Males had shorter distances from the posterior root apices to the MSF and higher frequencies of roots protruding through or touching the MSF than females. Conclusion: Anteroposterior skeletal growth patterns and sex affected the distances from the maxillary posterior roots to the MSF. The frequency of roots protruding into or touching the sinus was affected by both vertical and anteroposterior skeletal groups and sex. These findings have implications for dental practice.

Keywords

References

  1. Kumar M, Shanavas M, Sidappa A, Kiran M. Cone beam computed tomography - know its secrets. J Int Oral Health 2015; 7: 64-8.
  2. Jain S, Choudhary K, Nagi R, Shukla S, Kaur N, Grover D. New evolution of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: combining digital technologies. Imaging Sci Dent 2019; 49: 179-90. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2019.49.3.179
  3. Whyte A, Boeddinghaus R. The maxillary sinus: physiology, development and imaging anatomy. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2019; 48: 20190205. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20190205
  4. Iwanaga J, Wilson C, Lachkar S, Tomaszewski KA, Walocha JA, Tubbs RS. Clinical anatomy of the maxillary sinus: application to sinus floor augmentation. Anat Cell Biol 2019; 52: 17-24. https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2019.52.1.17
  5. Oz AZ, Oz AA, El H, Palomo JM. Maxillary sinus volume in patients with impacted canines. Angle Orthod 2017; 87: 25-32. https://doi.org/10.2319/122915-895.1
  6. Makris LM, Devito KL, D'Addazio PS, Lima CO, Campos CN. Relationship of maxillary posterior roots to the maxillary sinus and cortical bone: a cone beam computed tomographic study. Gen Dent 2020; 68: e1-4.
  7. Razumova S, Brago A, Howijieh A, Manvelyan A, Barakat H, Baykulova M. Evaluation of the relationship between the maxillary sinus floor and the root apices of the maxillary posterior teeth using cone-beam computed tomographic scanning. J Conserv Dent 2019; 22: 139-43. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_530_18
  8. Zhang X, Li Y, Zhang Y, Hu F, Xu B, Shi X, et al. Investigating the anatomical relationship between the maxillary molars and the sinus floor in a Chinese population using cone-beam computed tomography. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19: 282. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0969-0
  9. Junqueira RB, Souza-Nunes LA, Scalioni FA, Damasceno NN, Verner FS, Carvalho AC, et al. Anatomical evaluation of the relationship between the maxillary posterior teeth and maxillary sinus. Gen Dent 2020; 68: 66-71.
  10. Oishi S, Ishida Y, Matsumura T, Kita S, Sakaguchi-Kuma T, Imamura T, et al. A cone-beam computed tomographic assessment of the proximity of the maxillary canine and posterior teeth to the maxillary sinus floor: lessons from 4778 roots. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020; 157: 792-802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.06.018
  11. Pei J, Liu J, Chen Y, Liu Y, Liao X, Pan J. Relationship between maxillary posterior molar roots and the maxillary sinus floor: cone-beam computed tomography analysis of a western Chinese population. J Int Med Res 2020; 48: 300060520926896.
  12. Tian XM, Qian L, Xin XZ, Wei B, Gong Y. An analysis of the proximity of maxillary posterior teeth to the maxillary sinus using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2016; 42: 371-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.10.017
  13. Shrestha B, Shrestha R, Lin T, Lu Y, Lu H, Mai Z, et al. Evaluation of maxillary sinus volume in different craniofacial patterns: a CBCT study. Oral Radiol 2021; 37: 647-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-020-00506-2
  14. Celikoglu M, Bayram M, Sekerci AE, Buyuk SK, Toy E. Comparison of pharyngeal airway volume among different vertical skeletal patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Angle Orthod 2014; 84: 782-7. https://doi.org/10.2319/101013-748.1
  15. Costea MC, Bondor CI, Muntean A, Badea ME, Mesaros AS, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Proximity of the roots of posterior teeth to the maxillary sinus in different facial biotypes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 154: 346-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.01.006
  16. Ahn NL, Park HS. Differences in distances between maxillary posterior root apices and the sinus floor according to skeletal pattern. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017; 152: 811-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.05.021
  17. Kosumarl W, Patanaporn V, Jotikasthira D, Janhom A. Distances from the root apices of posterior teeth to the maxillary sinus and mandibular canal in patients with skeletal open bite: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Imaging Sci Dent 2017; 47: 157-64. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2017.47.3.157
  18. Son WS, Kim YI, Kim SS, Park SB, Kim SH. Anatomical relationship between the maxillary posterior teeth and the sinus floor according to an anterior overbite. Orthod Craniofac Res 2020; 23: 160-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12354
  19. Kang SH, Kim BS, Kim Y. Proximity of posterior teeth to the maxillary sinus and buccal bone thickness: a biometric assessment using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2015; 41: 1839-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.011
  20. Ok E, Gungor E, Colak M, Altunsoy M, Nur BG, Aglarci OS. Evaluation of the relationship between the maxillary posterior teeth and the sinus floor using cone-beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat 2014; 36: 907-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-014-1317-3
  21. Cacciafesta V, Melsen B. Mesial bodily movement of maxillary and mandibular molars with segmented mechanics. Clin Orthod Res 2001; 4: 182-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0544.2001.040309.x
  22. Re S, Cardaropoli D, Corrente G, Abundo R. Bodily tooth movement through the maxillary sinus with implant anchorage for single tooth replacement. Clin Orthod Res 2001; 4: 177-81. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0544.2001.040308.x
  23. Sun W, Xia K, Huang X, Cen X, Liu Q, Liu J. Knowledge of orthodontic tooth movement through the maxillary sinus: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health 2018; 18: 91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0551-1