인지과학 (Korean Journal of Cognitive Science)

한국인지과학회 (The Korean Society for Cognitive Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

계량서지학 방법론을 활용한 출처기억 연구분석: 인간 일화기억 연구를 중심으로

Bibliometric analysis of source memory in human episodic memory research

  • 박연진 (그랜드케니언 대학 경영학과) ;
  • 유수민 (연세대학교 심리학과) ;
  • 나윤진 (연세대학교 심리학과) ;
  • 한상훈 (연세대학교 심리학과)
  • Bak, Yunjin (Colangelo College of Business, Grand Canyon University) ;
  • Yu, Sumin (Department of Psychology, Yonsei University) ;
  • Nah, Yoonjin (Department of Psychology, Yonsei University) ;
  • Han, Sanghoon (Department of Psychology, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2022.03.14
  • 심사 : 2022.03.14
  • 발행 : 2022.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

출처기억은 사물에 대한 일화기억 경험의 맥락을 표상하는 중요 인지기제이다. 출처기억에 대한 그 동안의 연구는 일상의 일화기억과 밀접한 뇌신경, 행동학적 중요 연구들의 기초가 되어 왔고, 특히 집행기능이나 연합기제와 같은 인지기제를 강조하여 왔다. 본 연구에서는 계량서지학적 방법론을 통해 1989년에서 2020년 사이 출간된 출처기억 연구논문들을 분석하였고 핵심어 공동출현 연결네트워크와 저자 인용 연결망을 기반으로 출처기억 연구의 발전 흐름에 대한 깊이 있는 개관을 제시한다. 계량서지학적 분석을 통해 출처기억 연구의 추세를 확인한 결과, 2010년을 기준으로 이전 연구들에서는 출처기억의 인지적 기제와 관련한 개별 특성을 살핀 반면, 최근의 연구들은 뇌신경영역 간 연결성 특징 분석을 통한 임상적 특징연구를 비롯해 사회신경과학적 주제에 이르는 영향을 탐색하였다. 핵심어 연결성 분석을 통해 노화, 집행기능이 주요 핵심 주제어로서 연구되었음을 확인하였고, 최근 아동발달심리학과 메타기억 등의 관점에서 연구되는 추세로 나아가고 있음을 보았다. 관련된 출처기억의 이론과 연구모델을 기반으로 심리과학분야 내외에서 인지적 향상의 발달과 관련된 연구가 지속될 가능성을 제안하였다.

Source memory is a cognitive process that combines the representation of the origin of the episodic experience with an item. By studying this daily process, researchers have made fundamental discoveries that make up the foundation of brain and behavior research, such as executive function and binding. In this paper, we review and conduct a bibliometric analysis on source memory papers published from 1989 to 2020. This review is based on keyword co-occurrence networks and author citation networks, providing an in-depth overview of the development of source memory research and future directions. This bibliometric analysis discovers a change in the research trends: while research prior to 2010 focused on individuality of source memory as a cognitive function, more recent papers focus more on the implication of source memory as it pertains to connectivity between disparate brain regions and to social neuroscience. Keyword network analysis shows that aging and executive function are continued topics of interest, although frameworks in which they are viewed have shifted to include developmental psychology and meta memory. The use of theories and models provided by source memory research seem essential for the future development of cognitive enhancement tools within and outside of the field of Psychology.

키워드

과제정보

이 성과는 2019년도 정부(과학기술정보통신부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (No.2019R1A2C1007399).

참고문헌

  1. Van Damme I, Dewhurst S. Amnesia and the DRM Paradigm: How Encoding Factors (Do Not) Affect Lure Recognition. Psychol Belg. 2012;52. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.335
  2. Shimamura AP, Squire LR. The relationship between fact and source memory: Findings from amnesic patients and normal subjects. Psychobiology. 1991;19: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03337951
  3. Dobbins IG, Simons JS, Schacter DL. fMRI evidence for separable and lateralized prefrontal memory monitoring processes. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004;16: 908-920. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929041502751
  4. Mitchell KJ, Johnson MK, Raye CL, Greene EJ. Prefrontal cortex activity associated with source monitoring in a working memory task. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004;16: 921-934. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929041502724
  5. Johnson MK, Raye CL. Reality monitoring. Psychol Rev. 1981;88: 67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.67
  6. Mitchell DB, Hunt RR, Schmitt FA. The generation effect and reality monitoring: Evidence from dementia and normal aging. J Gerontol. 1986;41: 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/41.1.79
  7. Johnson MK. Reality monitoring: An experimental phenomenological approach. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1988;117: 390. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.117.4.390
  8. Cabeza R, Anderson ND, Locantore JK, McIntosh AR. Aging gracefully: compensatory brain activity in high-performing older adults. Neuroimage. 2002;17: 1394-1402. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1280
  9. Slotnick SD, Moo LR, Segal JB, Hart J. Distinct prefrontal cortex activity associated with item memory and source memory for visual shapes. Cogn Brain Res. 2003;17: 75-82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00082-X
  10. Dobbins IG, Foley H, Schacter DL, Wagner AD. Executive control during episodic retrieval: multiple prefrontal processes subserve source memory. Neuron. 2002;35: 989-996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00858-9
  11. Davachi L, Mitchell JP, Wagner AD. Multiple routes to memory: distinct medial temporal lobe processes build item and source memories. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003;100: 2157-2162. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0337195100
  12. Wittmann BC, Schott BH, Guderian S, Frey JU, Heinze H-J, Duzel E. Reward-related FMRI activation of dopaminergic midbrain is associated with enhanced hippocampus-dependent long-term memory formation. Neuron. 2005;45: 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.010
  13. Johnson MK, Hashtroudi S, Lindsay DS. Source monitoring. Psychol Bull. 1993;114: 3. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3
  14. Mitchell KJ, Johnson MK. Source monitoring 15 years later: what have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory? Psychol Bull. 2009;135: 638. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015849
  15. Porter AL, Kongthon A, Lu J-CJC. Research profiling: Improving the literature review. Scientometrics. 2002;53: 351-370. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014873029258
  16. Balaid A, Abd Rozan MZ, Hikmi SN, Memon J. Knowledge maps: A systematic literature review and directions for future research. Int J Inf Manage. 2016;36: 451-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.02.005
  17. Yeung AWK, Goto TK, Leung WK. The changing landscape of neuroscience research, 2006-2015: a bibliometric study. Front Neurosci. 2017;11: 120.
  18. Wang Y-Q, Chen Y-B, Xu D, Cui Y-L. Bibliometrics and Visualization of the Mechanisms of Parkinson's Diseases Based on Animal Models. Endocrine, Metab Immune Disord Targets (Formerly Curr Drug Targets-Immune, Endocr Metab Disord. 2020;20:1560-1568.
  19. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Visualizing bibliometric networks. Measuring scholarly impact. Springer; 2014. pp. 285-320.
  20. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics. 2017;111: 1053-1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
  21. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. CitNetExplorer: A new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks. J Informetr. 2014;8: 802-823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.07.006
  22. Ahuja, V., & Shakeel, M. (2017). Twitter Presence of Jet Airways-Deriving Customer Insights. Using Netnography and Wordclouds. In Procedia Computer Science 122: 17-24. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.procs2017.11.336
  23. Janowsky JS, Shimamura AP, Kritchevsky M, Squire LR. Cognitive impairment following frontal lobe damage and its relevance to human amnesia. Behav Neurosci. 1989;103: 548. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.103.3.548
  24. Glisky EL, Rubin SR, Davidson PSR. Source memory in older adults: An encoding or retrieval problem? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001;27: 1131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.5.1131
  25. Wilding EL, Rugg MD. Event-related potentials and the recognition memory exclusion task. Neuropsychologia. 1997;35: 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(96)00076-0
  26. Wilding EL. Separating retrieval strategies from retrieval success: An event-related potential study of source memory. Neuropsychologia. 1999;37: 441-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00100-6
  27. Wilding EL. In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection? Int J Psychophysiol. 2000;35: 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00095-1
  28. Johansson M, Mecklinger A. The late posterior negativity in ERP studies of episodic memory: action monitoring and retrieval of attribute conjunctions. Biol Psychol. 2003;64: 91-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00104-2
  29. Meiser T, Broder A. Memory for multidimensional source information. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002;28: 116. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.1.116
  30. Starns JJ, Hicks JL. Source dimensions are retrieved independently in multidimensional monitoring tasks. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005;31: 1213. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1213
  31. Hicks JL, Cockman DW. The effect of general knowledge on source memory and decision processes. J Mem Lang. 2003;48: 489-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00537-5
  32. Duarte A, Henson RN, Graham KS. The effects of aging on the neural correlates of subjective and objective recollection. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18: 2169-2180. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm243
  33. Van Petten C, Senkfor AJ, Newberg WM. Memory for drawings in locations: Spatial source memory and event-related potentials. Psychophysiology. 2000;37: 551-564. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3740551
  34. Glisky EL, Kong LL. Do young and older adults rely on different processes in source memory tasks? A neuropsychological study. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008;34: 809. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.809
  35. Multhaup KS, Balota DA. Generation effects and source memory in healthy older adults and in adults with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychology. 1997;11: 382. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.11.3.382
  36. Rugg MD, Yonelinas AP. Human recognition memory: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003;7: 313-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00131-1
  37. Cansino S, Maquet P, Dolan RJ, Rugg MD. Brain activity underlying encoding and retrieval of source memory. Cereb cortex. 2002;12: 1048-1056. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/12.10.1048
  38. Kahn I, Davachi L, Wagner AD. Functional-neuroanatomic correlates of recollection: implications for models of recognition memory. J Neurosci. 2004;24: 4172-4180. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0624-04.2004
  39. El Haj M, Kessels RPC, Allain P. Source memory rehabilitation: A review toward recommendations for setting up a strategy training aimed at the "what, where, and when" of episodic retrieval. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2016;23: 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2014.992071
  40. Shin YS, Masis-Obando R, Keshavarzian N, Dave R, Norman KA. Context-dependent memory effects in two immersive virtual reality environments: On Mars and underwater. Psychon Bull Rev. 2020; 1-9.
  41. Westphal AJ, Chow TE, Ngoy C, Zuo X, Liao V, Storozuk LA, et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation to the left rostrolateral prefrontal cortex selectively improves source memory retrieval. J Cogn Neurosci. 2019;31: 1380-1391. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01421