한국융합학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Convergence Society)

  • 제13권4호
  • /
  • Pages.7-15
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2233-4890(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6353(eISSN)
한국융합학회 (Korea Convergence Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

AI 윤리와 규제에 관한 표준 프레임워크 설정 방안 연구

A Study on How to Set up a Standard Framework for AI Ethics and Regulation

  • 남문희 (서울과학기술대학교 IT정책전문대학원 AI 공공정책학과)
  • Nam, Mun-Hee (Dept. of AI Public Policy, SNUST Graduate School of Public Policy and Information Technology)
  • 투고 : 2022.01.04
  • 심사 : 2022.04.20
  • 발행 : 2022.04.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

정보와 기술의 탈중앙화/분권, 공유/개방, 연결을 통한 개별 맞춤 시대의 지능화 세계 지향으로 그 어느 때 보다도 인공지능에 대한 관심과 기술적 담론 속에 기대와 우려가 교차하는 경향을 자주 보게 된다. 최근에는 2045년 전, 후로 AI의 특이성(Singularity)이 나타날 것이라는 미래학자들의 주장도 쉽게 찾아볼 수 있다. 이제는 다가올 인공지능 시대에서 AI와 함께 상생하고 번영하는 공존 패러다임을 만들기 위한 준비의 일환으로 보다 올바른 AI 윤리와 규제 설정을 위한 표준 프레임워크가 요구되고 있다. 주요지침 설정 누락의 위험성 배제와 타당하고 보다 합리적인 지침 항목과 평가 기준을 가늠 할 수 있는 방안이 점차 큰 연구문제로 나타나고 있기 때문이다. 이런 연구문제 해결과 동시에 AI 윤리와 규제 설정에 대한 지속적인 경험과 학습효과가 연결 발전될 수 있도록 국제기구/국가/기업의 AI 윤리와 규제에 대한 가이드 라인 자료 등을 수집하여 설정 연구모형과 텍스트 마이닝 탐색 분석을 통해 표준 프레임워크(SF: Standard Framework) 설정 방안을 연구 제시한다. 본 연구결과는 향후 보다 발전적인 AI 윤리와 규제지침 항목 설정과 평가 방안연구에 기초 선행연구 자료로 기여될 수 있을 것이다.

With the aim of an intelligent world in the age of individual customization through decentralization of information and technology, sharing/opening, and connection, we often see a tendency to cross expectations and concerns in the technological discourse and interest in artificial intelligence more than ever. Recently, it is easy to find claims by futurists that AI singularity will appear before and after 2045. Now, as part of preparations to create a paradigm of coexistence that coexists and prosper with AI in the coming age of artificial intelligence, a standard framework for setting up more correct AI ethics and regulations is required. This is because excluding the risk of omission of setting major guidelines and methods for evaluating reasonable and more reasonable guideline items and evaluation standards are increasingly becoming major research issues. In order to solve these research problems and at the same time to develop continuous experiences and learning effects on AI ethics and regulation setting, we collect guideline data on AI ethics and regulation of international organizations / countries / companies, and research and suggest ways to set up a standard framework (SF: Standard Framework) through a setting research model and text mining exploratory analysis. The results of this study can be contributed as basic prior research data for more advanced AI ethics and regulatory guidelines item setting and evaluation methods in the future.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. K. F. Lee. (2020). AI Super Power. Seoul: Econbook,
  2. D. H. Jeong. (2020a). The era of AI supergap will come in three years.. Seoul: Cheonglim Publishing, 29-31.
  3. D. H. Jung. (2020b). The era of AI supergap will come in three years.. Seoul: Cheonglim Publishing, 111.
  4. H. O. Lee. (2021). The Guarantee of a Right to Self-Determination in Response to the Decision Making of Artificial Intelligence. The Institute for Legal Studies, 27(1), 35-68. DOI : 10.35901/kjcl.2021.27.1.33
  5. E. S. Hong. (2019). Neo-Colonialism in The Age of Artificial Intelligence: Sentient Machine and Singularity in Transcendence. Institute of Humanities, 89, 255-284. DOI : 10.21211/JHUM.89.8
  6. Japan Economic Daily. (2020). AI 2045, Artificial Intelligence Future Report. Seoul: Bunny, 13.
  7. Saito Kazunori. (2018). What will happen when AI transcends humans?. Seoul: e-public, 15-35.
  8. S. H. Kim. (2019). Artificial intelligence AI coexistence paradigm. Seoul: Aquarius, 5-15.
  9. G. S. Kim. (2019). An Exploratory Study on Artificial Intelligence Governance. Korean Journal of Local Government & Administration Studies, 33(2), 219-236. DOI : 10.18398/kjlgas.2019.33.2.219
  10. H. Y. Park, B. Y. Kim, H. Y. Kwon. (2021). Trends and Implications of Regulations for AI Control. Information Law, 25(2), 3-35. DOI : 10.22846/kafil.25.2.202108.001
  11. H. W. Han. (2018). A Basic Study on the Possibility of Artificial Intelligence as a Legal Entity. Chung_Ang Law Review, 20(3), 375-411. DOI : 10.21759/caulaw.2018.20.3.375
  12. S. G. Go. (2019). How to coexist with AI. Seoul: Targus, 32.
  13. S. Y. Byun. (2020). A Study on the Problem of AI Bias in Data Ethics. Korea Society of Ethics, 1(128), 143-158. DOI : 10.15801/je.1.128..202003.143
  14. S. W. Haek. (2021). The direction of AI regulation based on the Constitutional Transparency Principle. Sungkyunkwan Law Review, 33(2), 589-622. DOI : 10.17008/skklr.2021.33.2.018
  15. OECD. (2019). OECD Principles on AI. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/ai/principles/
  16. ZDNet Korea. (2021). Adoption of UNESCO AI Ethics Recommendations. Retrieved from https://zdnet.co.kr/view/?no=20211124105459
  17. AI Times. (2021). Ethics and Governance of AI for Health of WHO. Retrieved from http://www.aitimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=139346
  18. Commission. (2018). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Retrieved from http://scimonitors.com
  19. H. Y. Park, B. Y. Kim & H. Y. Kwon. (2021). A Study on the Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in the European Union's Bill. Public Law, 49(3), 349-374. DOI : 10.38176/PublicLaw.2021.02.49.3.349
  20. FTC U.S.A. (2020). Using Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms. Retrieved from https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/blogs/businessblog/2020/04/using-artificial-intelligence-algorithm
  21. J. P. Sulins & E. J. Kwon. (2019). US Developments in AI Ethics and Governance. Journal of Law & Economic Ragulation, 12(2), 100-115.
  22. NIST U.S.A. (2020). NIST Asks A.I. to Explain Itself. Retrieved from https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2020/08/nist-asks-ai-explain-itself
  23. Ministry of Science and Technology Information and Communication. (2020). Human-centered AI ethics standards. 6-8.
  24. Korea Communications Commission. (2021). Basic principles of protecting users of AI-based media recommendation service. Retrieved from http://www.busan.com/view/busan/view.php?code=2021063017354285125&invenCode=9EA1fk&recCode=zQZZkf
  25. S. G. Go. (2019). How to coexist with AI. Seoul: Targus, 258-259.
  26. PDPC. (2018). Discussion Paper on AI and Personal Data- Fostering Responaible Development and Adoption of AI. Retrieved from. https://www.privacy.go.kr/pic/nation_singapore05.do
  27. J. H. Kim. (2018). AI Recommendations. Retrieved from http://www.aifnlife.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=902
  28. UK Government Digital Service. (2019). A guide to the use of AI in the UK public sector. National Information Society Agency, DNA Plus-2019.
  29. Law Council of Australlia. (2019). ArtificialIntelligence: Australia's Ethics Framework. Australlia Gov, 13-28.
  30. D. Lindsay, J. Hogan & T. H. Kim. (2019). An Australian Perspective on AI, Ethics and its Regulatory Challenges. Journal of Law & Economic Regulation, 12(2), 128-136.
  31. Ministry of Science and Technology. (2021). New generation of artificial intelligence ethics. Retrieved from http://www.most.gov.cn/kjbgz/202109/t20210926_177063.html
  32. IBM. (2020). AI Ethics in Practice. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/kr-ko/artificial-intelligence/ethics?mhsrc=ibmsearch_a&mhq=AI%EC%9C%A4%EB%A6%AC
  33. Microsoft. (2016). Our approach to responsible AI at Microsoft. Retrieved from https://www.microsoft.com
  34. Google. (2018). Artificial Intelligence at Google: Our Principles. Retrieved from. https://ai.google/principles
  35. Kakao. (2018). AI Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.kakaocorp.com/page/responsible/detail/algorithm
  36. NAVER. (2018). AI Code of Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.navercorp.com/value/aiCodeEthics
  37. Samsung AI news. (2019). AI Ethics, 2019. Retrieved from https://news.samsung.com/kr/samsung-ai-news
  38. DeeepMind. (2017). Ethics & Society Principles, 2017. Retrieved from https://deepmind.com/about/ethics-and-society
  39. Japan Economic Daily. (2020). AI 2045, Artificial Intelligence Future Report. Seoul: Bunny, 140.
  40. Cate Crawford et al. (2019). AI Now 2019 Report. Retrieved from. https://ainowinstitute.org/AI_Now_2019_Report.pdf
  41. OpenAI. (2018). OpenAI Charter, 2018 Retrieved from. https://openai.com/charter/
  42. S. Y. Noh. (2020). AI era, tomorrow of tomorrow. Seoul: Book publishing East Asia, 305.
  43. J. Y. Hoa. (2018). The Safety, Ethics, and Legal Liability of Autonomous Vehicle in U.S.A. Institution of American Constitution 29(2), 199-244.