DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

계획행동이론을 적용한 장애인 메가 스포츠 이벤트에 대한 대학생의 관람 의도 모형 분석

Analysis of Model of Intentions of University Students to Watch Mega Sports Events with People with Disabilities Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior

  • 김경진 (나사렛대학교 특수체육학과) ;
  • 김재화 (순천향대학교 스포츠과학과)
  • Kim, Kyungjin (Dept. of Adapted Physical Activity, Korea Nazarene University) ;
  • Kim, Jaehwa (Dept. of Sports Science, Soonchunhyang University)
  • 투고 : 2022.01.18
  • 심사 : 2022.04.20
  • 발행 : 2022.04.28

초록

이 연구는 계획행동이론을 적용한 장애인 메가 스포츠 이벤트에 대한 대학생의 관람 의도에 대해 연구모형의 적합성 검증과 변인들 간의 인과적 영향관계를 알아보는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 선행연구에서 도출된 하위 변인들의 문항들을 바탕으로 전문가 회의, 타당도, 신뢰도 검증을 통해 최종적으로 설문지를 구성하였다. 자료분석은 SPSS 21.0을 이용하여 Cronbach's a 및 탐색적 요인분석을 실시하였고, AMOS 18.0을 이용하여 구조방정식 모형 분석(SEM) 및 확인적 요인분석(CFA)을 실시하였다. 그 결과 첫째, 계획행동이론을 적용한 장애인 메가 스포츠 이벤트에 대한 대학생의 관람 의도 연구모형의 검증 결과 CFI, NFI, IFI의 평가지수가 수용의 기준을 충족하여 이 연구모형의 적합성이 양호한 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 장애인 메가 스포츠 이벤트에 대한 대학생의 관람 의도 연구모형의 영향관계를 검증한 결과 대학생의 행동신념과 규범신념은 관람 의도에 정(+)의 유이한 영향관계가 있는 것으로 나타났지만, 대학생의 통제신념 관람 의도에는 부(-)의 유의한 영향관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다.

The purpose of the study was to determine the suitability of the research model on the intentions of university students to watch mega sports events for people with disabilities to which the theory of planned behavior was applied, and to examine the influence relationship between variables. Based on the items of sub-variables derived from the previous research, the questionnaire was optimally constructed through expert meetings, validity, and reliability verification. For data analysis, Cronbach's 𝛼 and exploratory factor analysis were performed using SPSS 21.0, and structural equation model analysis (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed using AMOS 18.0. The results were as follows; first, as a result of verification of the research model of intentions of university students to watch mega sports events with people with disabilities to which the theory of planned behavior was applied, the evaluation indices of CFI, NFI, and IFI met the acceptance criteria, indicating that this research model was well suited. Second, as a result of examining the influence relationship of the research model on the intentions of university students to watch mega sports event for people with disabilities, it was found that the behavioral beliefs and normative beliefs of university students had a significantly positive (+) influence to intentions. However, it was found that there was a significantly negative (-) influence on the control beliefs to intentions.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.

참고문헌

  1. Korean Paralympic Committee. (2021). Korean Paralympic Committee Homepage. From https://www.koreanpc.kr/index.do
  2. J. H. Kim, & K. J. Kim. (2018). Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Intention of Going to a Disability Mega Sport Event: Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Korean Journal of Sport and Leisure Studies, 73, 391-405. DOI : 10.51979/KSSLS.2018.08.73.391
  3. Y. S. Park. (2021.10.06.). Tokyo Paralympic Games Broadcast, only 7.3% Compared to the Olympics. Wellpare News. http://www.welfarenews.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=78928
  4. C. J. Kim, & J. K. Byeun. (2019). The Plan for Physical Fitness Support for Performance Improvement of the Korean National Athletes with Disabilities in the Tokyo Paralympics 2020. The Korean Journal of Sport, 17(2), 1207-1217.
  5. D. Ozer, F. Baran, A. Aktop, S. Nalbant, E. Aglamis, & Y. Hutzler. (2012). Effects of a Special Olympics Unified Sports Soccer Program on Psycho-social Attributes of Youth with and without Intellectual Disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 229-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.09.011
  6. T. P. Shriver. (1997). Effects of the Special Olympics World Games on Attitudes of Non-handicapped Children Towards Persons with Mental Retardation. Dissertation Abstracts International. A, The Humanities and Social Sciences, 58(4-A), 1247.
  7. K. Ferrara, J. Burns & H. Mills. (2015). Public Attitudes Toward People with Intellectual Disabilities after Viewing Olympic or Paralympic Performance. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 32(1), 19-33. DOI : 10.1123/apaq.2014-0136
  8. S. H. An & C. K. Lee. (2017). The Effect of Temporal and Spatial Distance for the PyeongChang 2018 Olympic Winter Games on the Decision-Making Process: Using Extended Theory of Planned Behavior. Korean Journal of Tourism Sciences, 41(1), 47-63. DOI : 10.17086/JTS.2017.41.1.47.63
  9. Y. A. Park. (2013). A Study on the Structural Relationships between Local Residents' Spectator Motivations, Attitude and Participation Intention in Mega Event: A Focus on a Moderating Role of Local Attachment. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 26(10), 2691-2709.
  10. M. Park, T. Yoh, Y. S. Choi & M. W. Olson. (2011). Consumer Attitudes Toward the Paralympic Games and Purchase Intentions Toward Corporate Sponsors of the Paralympic Games: Market Segmentation Strategy. Journal Venue and Event Management, 3(2), 2-15.
  11. I. Ajzen. (2010). Attitudes, personality, and behavior (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
  12. T. H. Feeley. (2007). College Students' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Regarding Organ Donation: An Integrated Review of the Literature. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(2), 243-271. DOI : 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2007.00159.x
  13. D. Hooper, J. Coughlan & M. R. Mullen. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53-60
  14. R. B. Kline. (2010). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
  15. L. R. Tucker & C. Lewis. (1973). A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1-10. DOI : 10.1007/BF02291170
  16. H. S. Lee. (2012). Analysis of Model of Sport for All Participate Behavior with People with Physical Disabilities Applied to the TPB. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 51(2), 431-440.
  17. H. I. Jo. (2005). An Examination of the Theory of Planned Behaviour in the Participation and Adherence of the Golf. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 44(3), 277-285.
  18. K. J. Kim, & A. R. Oh. (2020). An Analysis of Intentions Toward Assessment about Physical Activity of Students with Disabilities by Disability Labels of Preservice Physical Education Instructors. Asia-Pacific Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 7(1), 87-103.
  19. H. S. Lee. (2014). The Analysis of Pre-Service Physical Educator's Behavior Intention Toward Teaching Student with Disabilities Using the Theory of Planned Behavior. The Korean Society of Sports Science, 23(4), 825-835.
  20. I. Ajzen. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
  21. E. Bondy & M. T. Brownell. (2004). Getting Beyond the Research to Practice Gap: Researching Against the Grain. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640402700105
  22. L. R. Potwarka, R. Nunkoo & R. E. McCarville. (2014). Understanding Television Viewership of A Mega Event: The Case of the 2010 Winter Olympics. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 23(5), 536-563. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2013.835252
  23. N. Megginson, F. Degnam, N. Rynn & T. Kakert. (1995). Spectators Characteristics and Level of Team Allegiance with Wheelchair Basketball. In Poster Presented at the 10th International Symposium on Adapted Physical Activity, Oslo/Beitostolen, Norway.