DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중·장년층의 도시숲 이용행태에 따른 긍정심리와 시민의식의 차이 분석

Difference Analysis of the Positive Psychology and Citizenship according to the Use Type of Urban Forests in Middle Aged

  • 이숙정 (숙명여자대학교 기초교양학부)
  • Lee, Sook-Jeong (Division of General Education, Sookmyung Women's University)
  • 투고 : 2022.02.17
  • 심사 : 2022.04.20
  • 발행 : 2022.04.28

초록

본 연구는 서울시에 거주하는 중장년층의 도시숲 이용특성에 따른 긍정심리와 시민의식의 차이를 분석하기 위해 수행되었다. 연구목적을 달성하기 위해, 중장년층 성인 156명을 편의표집하였고, 수집된 자료는 SPSS 25.0 프로그램을 이용하여 기술통계, 집단별 차이검증, Schéffe 사후검증을 실시하였다. 주요 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 회복탄력성과 낙관성 및 시민의식의 성별 차이는 유의하였으나 연령별 차이는 유의하지 않았다. 둘째, 도시숲 이용행태에 따라 자기효능감, 회복탄력성, 낙관성과 긍정심리 전체, 그리고 시민의식에 차이가 나타났다. 평균수명이 증가함에 따라 중장년층 인구에 대한 사회적, 정책적 지원이 필요한 만큼, 시민들의 심리사회적 건강 증진을 위해 도시숲 체험의 기회와 방법의 다양성을 적극적으로 모색해야 할 것이다.

This study was conducted to analyze the difference between positive psychology and citizenship according to the characteristics of urban forest use among middle-aged living in Seoul. In order to achieve the purpose of the study, 156 middle-aged were convenience sampled, and the collected data were subjected to descriptive statistics, variance analysis, and Schéffe post-test using the SPSS 25.0 program. The main research results are as follows. First, gender differences in resilience, optimism, and citizenship were significant, but differences by age were not significant. Second, there were differences in positive psychology and citizenship according to the characteristics of urban forest use. As the average life expectancy increases, social and policy support for the middle-aged population is needed, so it is necessary to actively seek out the diversity of opportunities and methods of urban forest experience to improve the psych-social health of citizens.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. S. Ju. (2019). Urban Forest Policy and Program in UK and USA. Journal of Government and Policy, 12(1), 57-78. http://gipi.catholic.ac.kr/html/sub03_04.asp
  2. Korea Forest Service. (2021). Urban Forests https://www.forest.go.kr/kfsweb/kfi/kfs/cms/cmsView.do?mn=NKFS_03_14_01_01&cmsId=FC_001303
  3. 2020 Urban Planning Status Statistics, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. https://www.eum.go.kr/web/cp/st/stUpisStatDet.jsp (2022.02.13.)
  4. C. H. Oh. (2018). Urban Ecosystem and Urban Forest, Forest and Culture, 27(4), 7-20. DOI: https://m.earticle.net/Article/A337688
  5. Korea Forest Services. (2021). Forest Basic Statistics. https://www.forest.go.kr/kfsweb/kfi/kfs/cms/cmsView.do?mn=NKFS_04_05_01&cmsId=FC_000065 (2022.02.10.)
  6. O. Douglas, M. Lennon & M. Scott. (2017). Green Space Benefits for Health and Well-being: A Life-Course Approach for Urban Planning, Design and Management, Cities, 66, 53-62. http://www.ecohealth.ie/uploads/8/2/2/4/82247168/cities_journal_article_researchgate_final.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.03.011
  7. K. M. Korpela, K. Borodulin, M. Neuvonen, O. Paronen & L. Tyrvainen. (2014). Analyzing the Mediators Between Nature-based Outdoor Recreation and Emotional Well-being, Journal of Environmental Psychology 37, 1-7. ll rights reserved. DOI : 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.003
  8. W. H. Jung, J. Woo & J. S. Ryu. (2014). Effect of Frequency of Using Forest Environment on Worker's Stress: a Comparative Study on Workers in Medical and Counseling Service Institution, Journal of Korean Forest Society, 103(1), 129-136. DOI : 10.14578/jkfs.2014.103.1.129
  9. S. K. Hong, J. J. Kim & J. M. Kim. (2018) Effects of the Number of Visits and Length of Stay in Urban Forests on Subjective Well-Being: A Case Study of Seoul. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 46(3), 92-102. DOI : 10.9715/KILA.2018.46.3.092
  10. D. F. Coldwell & K. L. Evans. (2018). Visits to Urban Green-Space and the Countryside Associate with different Components of Mental Well-being and are Better Predictors than Perceived or Actual Local Urbanisation Intensity, Landscape and Urban Planning, 175, 114-122. DOI : 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.02.007
  11. H. Kim & J. Yoo. (2015). A Study on the Difference of Satisfaction with Life and Depression of Adult Women by Utilization Patterns of Urban Forest, Journal of the Korean Institute of Forest Recreation, 19(1), 75-84. DOI : 10.34272/forest.2015.19.1.008
  12. Y. Jang, J. Lee & R. Yoo. (2020). The Effects of ForestVisit Characteristics on the Individual Life Satisfaction. Journal of the Korean Institute of Forest Recreation, 24(3), 17-27. DOI : 10.34272/forest.2020.24.3.002
  13. B. Kim, H. Kim & S. Lee. (2013). The Effect of Forest Experiences on Happiness and Positive Psychology of Korean Middle-Aged Women in Seoul and the Surrounding Metropolitan Cities, Journal of the Korean Institute of Forest Recreation, 17(3), 65-73. DOI : 10.34272/forest.2013.17.3.008
  14. J. Lee & S. Lee. (2014). An Analysis of Relationships among Urban Forest Experiences, Emotional Intelligence, Learning Flow and Career Stress in Korean Undergraduate Students, Journal of the Korean Institute of Forest Recreation, 18(1), 35-44. DOI : 10.34272/forest.2014.18.1.004
  15. I. D. Han. (2019). The Effect of Forest Healing Program on the Resilience of Elderly People in Urban Forest, Master's Dissertation, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T15069201&outLink=K
  16. G. Wang, M. Lee, E. Lee, H. Lee & B. Park. (2021). Effects of Forest Therapy Program in Urban Forest on Skeletal Muscle Mass, Visceral Fat and Depression in Elderly Women: A Case Study of the Mt. Bibong in Anseong, Journal of Recreation and Landscape, 15(1), 35-42. DOI : 10.51549/JORAL.2021.15.1.035
  17. S. Kaplan. (1995). The urban forest as a source of psychological well-being. In G. A. Bradley, Ed., Urban Forest Landscapes: Integrating multidisciplinary perspectives. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  18. G. Y. Park. (2013). A Study on the Survey Contents of the Current Civic Value Consciousness of the Korean and its Tasks, Journal of Ethics, 93, 1-35. DOI : 10.15801/je.1.93.201312.1
  19. H. Park & J. Namgung. (2018). University Students' Citizenship and Influencing Factors, The Journal of Politics of Education, 25(2), 165-193. DOI : 10.52183/KSPE.2018.25.2.165
  20. J. J. Cogan. (2000). Citizenship for the 21st Century: an International Perspective on Education, London: Kogan Page.
  21. E. Chi & G. Sun. (2007). Analyzing the Construct of Global Citizenship and Related Variables, Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 39(4), 115-134. DOI : 10.35557/trce.39.4.200712.006
  22. A. Abraham, K. Sommerhalder & T. Abel. (2009). Landscape and Well-being: a Scoping Study on the Health-Promoting Impact of Outdoor Environments, International Journal of Public Health, 55(1), 59-69. DOI : 10.1007/s00038-009-0069-z
  23. B. Jeon. (2017). A Study on User's Perception for Forest Welfare Service of Urban Forest, Master's Dissertation, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea.
  24. H. S. Lee. (2021). Characteristics and Preferences of Users for the Development of Forest Healing Programs in Urban Forests, Master's Dissertation, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea.
  25. R. H. Yoo, S. K. Lee, S. K. Kim, S. W. Bae & E. Y. Yoon. (2007). A Study oon the Preference Analysis by Use Type of Urban Forests, Journal of the Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 11(4), 1-6. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE01151850
  26. H. E. Kim. (2020). The Effects of Positive Psychological Capital of Participants in the University Learning Support Program on Learning Performance Mediated by Self-determination Motivation and Learning Flow: Multi-group Analysis Based on Program Participation. Doctoral Dissertation, Dongduk Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
  27. H. E. Kim & E. J. Jang. (2021). The Effects of Positive Psychological Capital of Participants in the University Learning Support Program on Learning Performance Mediated by Self-determination Motivation and Learning Flow, Journal of Learner Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(5), 383-401. DOI : 10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.5.383
  28. S. Lee. (2017). Analysis of the Effectiveness and Improvement of Global Citizenship Education in Higher Education", Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 7(10), 433-443. https://doi.org/10.35873/AJMAHS.2017.7.10.040
  29. R. S. Ulrich. (1984). View Through a Window May Influence Recovery from Surgery, Science, 224(4647), 420-421. DOI : 10.1126/science.6143402
  30. K. A. Lee & H. W. Son. (2021). A Study on the College Adaptation and Core competencies of Students in Post Corona Era, Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 12(5), 239-254. DOI : 10.15207/JKCS.2021.12.5.239
  31. P. Grahn & U. A. Stigsdotter. (2003). Landscape Planning and Stress, Urban forestry & Urban Greening, 2(1), 1-18. DOI : 10.1078/1618-8667-00019
  32. OECD(Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2020). How's Life? 2020: measuring well-being, Paris: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/statistics/how-s-life-23089679.htm
  33. S. Park & C. Koo. (2018). Needs Analysis for the Development of Forest Therapy Program Utilizing the Urban Forest: Focused on the Visitors of Incheon Grand Park, Journal of the Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 22(1), 11-24. DOI : 10.34272/forest.2018.22.1.002
  34. W. Park, S. Y. Son, H. Park & H. S. Park. (2010). A Proposal on Determining Appropriate Sample Size Considering Statistical Conclusion Validity. Seoul Journal of Industrial Relations, 21, 51-85. https://hdl.handle.net/10371/144993
  35. S. I. Park & T. Oh. (2010). The Application of Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Journal of Veterinary Clinics, 27(1), 71-78. http://www.koreascience.kr/article/JAKO201017337338365.page?&lang=ko