Journal of Science Education (과학교육연구지)

Science Education Research Institute Kyungpook National University (경북대학교 과학교육연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis on Writing Status of Laboratory Notebook by Science-Gifted High School Students

과학고 및 영재학교에 재학 중인 과학영재의 연구노트 작성실태 분석

  • Hyeoksang Yu (Korea Intellectural property STrategy Agency (KISTA)) ;
  • Jiwon Lee (Korea national university of education)
  • Received : 2022.10.11
  • Accepted : 2022.12.28
  • Published : 2022.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We analyzed the responses of 152 science-gifted high school students by surveying the status and recognition of writing and keeping laboratory notebooks to develop guidelines and education plans. Science-gifted students did not write laboratory notes diligently, despite recognizing that it is crucial to do so. Mentors also tended not to provide faithful guidance and inspection. There was an insufficient practice in using research evidence in laboratory notebooks, such as including names and dates for authentication. In addition, while a high ratio of students owned their own laboratory notebooks, there was not a high level of recognition regarding the retention period, ownership, and responsibility. Based on these results, we propose suggestions for improving educational institutions for gifted students in science. First, it is necessary to strengthen the guidance for science-gifted students to faithfully write laboratory notebooks. Second, education on writing laboratory notebooks should be provided. Third, science-gifted high schools should prepare regulations for the management of lab notes and conduct education based on them.

이 연구에서는 과학영재의 연구노트의 작성과 보관 현황 및 인식 실태를 분석하여, 향후 연구노트 작성과 관리 지침 및 교육 방안 마련을 위한 시사점을 도출하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위하여 과학영재 고등학생을 대상으로 설문을 실시하였고 152명의 응답을 분석하였다. 과학영재 학생들의 연구노트 작성과 보관 현황 및 인식의 특성을 살펴보면, 연구노트의 작성이 중요하다고 인식하는 것에 비해 성실하게 작성하지 않았고, 지도교사나 과학자 등 멘토의 지도와 점검도 성실하게 수행되지 않는 경향이 나타났다. 또, 이름, 날짜기입 등 연구증빙을 위한 실행이 부족하였다. 그리고 연구노트를 학생이 직접 소유하고 보관하는 비율이 가장 높았으나, 보존 기간이 얼마인지, 소유 및 보관 주체가 누구인지에 대한 인식 수준은 높지 않았다. 이러한 결과에 기반하여 과학영재 교육기관의 개선사항을 제안한다. 첫째, 연구노트 작성을 성실히 수행하도록 과학영재 학생들에 대한 지도를 강화할 필요가 있다. 둘째, 연구노트 작성 방법에 대해 구체적으로 교육할 필요가 있다. 셋째, 학교에서 구체적인 연구노트 작성, 관리에 대한 규정을 마련하고 이를 바탕으로 교육이 이루어져야 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, H. O. & Rieh, H. Y (2010). A Study on the Methods for Systematic Management of Research Records in Engineering School Laboratories in Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 10(1), 119-139.
  2. Enforcement Decree of National Research And Development Innovation Act. Korean Presidential Decree No31297 (2021). Retrieved from https://www.law.go.kr.
  3. Kim, D. H. (2021). How to write Laboratory Notebooks to secure research ethics. Spring Conference of the Korean Society for Quality Management, 2021(0): 92-92.
  4. Kim, D. J., Park, K. T., & Pentland, D. (2014). Correlations between Chemistry Lab Notebooks Scores and Academic Achievement Scores of Gifted Science Students and Their Perceptions on Chemistry Lab and the Lab Notebooks. International Journal of Research in Education Methodology. 6(2), 875-886.
  5. Kim, H. M. & Lee, Y. H. (2019). Current Status and Improvement Plan for Records Management at Research and Management Institutions : Focused on Core Research Records. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 19(2), 173-191.
  6. Kim, J. H. (2011). A Study on the Creation and Maintenance of Laboratory Notebooks in Scientific Laboratories of a University. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 11(1), 139-159.
  7. Kim, R. S. & Chang, W. K. (2016). A Study on the Record Management Manual for R & D Management: A Focus on Government-Supported Science Research Institutes. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 16(3), 179-207.
  8. Koo, C. M. & Kim, S. -H. (2017). An Analysis of the Value and Characteristics of Research Records from an Archives and Records Management Perspective. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 17(3), 49-70.
  9. Korea Intellectual Property Strategy Agency (2021). 2021년도 연구노트 작성.관리 실태 보고서 [Writing and managing laboratory notebook status in 2021]. Sejong, Korea: Author. Retrieved from https://www.e-note.or.kr.
  10. Korea Intellectual Property Srategy Agency (2022). 국가연구개발사업 연구노트 작성 매뉴얼 [National R&D project laboratory notebook writing manual]. Sejong, Korea: Author. Retrieved from https://www.e-note.or.kr.
  11. Lee, I. J. (2021). Research Ethics in the Process of Conducting Research. The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology, 77(6), 267-276. https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2021.407
  12. Lee, J.-E. (2019, September 18). 조국만큼 '핫'한 나경원, 4대 논란 총정리 [Na Kyung-won, as 'hot' as Jo Gug, summarizes the 4 major controversies. Money Today. Retrieved from https://www.busan.com.
  13. Lee, J., Kim, J. B., & Isozaki, T. (2017). A comparative study on scientific misconduct between Korean and Japanese science gifted students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3519-3538.
  14. Lee, J. (2021). A missing piece in high school science education: Research ethics in the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 43(11), 1799-1816.
  15. Lee, J. (2018). Reasons of research misconduct of science-gifted students based on in-depth interviews with them and their teachers. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 17(3), 125-153.
  16. Lee, M. J. Kim, O.-J. Cho, E. H. Jeon, J.-H. Lee, D. H. Lee, S. B. Rhee, S. H. Moon A. R. (2021). Introduction of the National R&D Innovation Act and Research Ethics in Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Health Law & Ethics, 14(2), 155-192. https://doi.org/10.38046/APJHLE.2021.14.2.007
  17. Ministry of Education (2022). 고등학생 이하 미성년 공저자 연구물 검증결과 [Verification of research publications by co-authors under high school students]. Sejong, Korea: Author. Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.kr.
  18. Ministry of Science and ICT (2021). 국가연구개발사업 연구노트 지침 [National R&D Project Laboratory Research Notebook Guidelines]. Retrieved from https://www.law.go.kr.
  19. Ministry of Science and ICT (2021). 국가연구개발 과제평가 표준지침 [Standard Guidelines for National R&D Project Evaluation]. Retrieved from https://www.msit.go.kr.
  20. Ministry of Science and ICT (2018). 연구노트 지침 [Guidelines of laboratory notebook]. Retrieved from https://www.law.go.kr.
  21. National Research and Development Innovation Act. Act No18645 (2021). Retrieved from https://www.law.go.kr.
  22. National Research Foundation of Korea (2021). 바람직한 '창의연구(R&E) 활동'을 위한 권고사항 [Recommendations for desirable 'Creative Research (R&E) Activities']. Retrieved from https://www.cre.or.kr.
  23. Nussbeck, S. Y., Weil, P., Menzel, J., Marzec, B., Lorberg, K., & Schwappach, B. (2014). The laboratory notebook in the 21st century: the electronic laboratory notebook would enhance good scientific practice and increase research productivity. EMBO reports, 15(6), 631-634. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201338358
  24. Park, K. B., Hong, S. M., Hong, S.-J. & Oh, J. S. (2016). Autonomy and Responsibility of Science in Public Research. Sejong: kyungsungmunhwasa.
  25. Seoul National University (2022). Seoul National University Research Ethics Guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.law.go.kr.
  26. Song, H. S. (2022). '부모 찬스' 허위 공저.논문 표절, 전면 공개해 연구부정 근절한다 ['Parent's Chance', eradicate research misconduct by fully-open up inappropriate co-authorship and plagiarism]. BusanIlbo. Retrieved from http://www.busan.com.
  27. Yim, J. H. (2011). A Study on the Records Management Tasks for Obtaining Quality Research and Laboratory. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 11(1), 183-206.
  28. Yu, H. S. (2021). 국가연구개발혁신법 제도개선위원회 보고서 [National Research And Development Innovation Act Institutional Improvement Committee Report]. Sejong, Korea.