Imaging Science in Dentistry

Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (대한영상치의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Inter-observer reliability in cone-beam computed tomography assessment of the retromolar canal: A practical plan to improve diagnostic imaging

  • Igarashi, Chinami (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Diagnosis, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine) ;
  • Theramballi, Yeshoda Ganesh (Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences) ;
  • Kobayashi, Kaoru (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Diagnosis, Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine)
  • Received : 2021.12.07
  • Accepted : 2022.01.31
  • Published : 2022.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate inter-observer reliability among observers with different levels of proficiency and the diagnostic imaging reliability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of the retromolar canal. Materials and Methods: CBCT images of 307 patients were assessed for the presence of retromolar canals(RMCs) by 3 observers independently. Diagnoses were made twice by each observer at intervals of more than 3 weeks. Interobserver reliability was assessed using the kappa coefficient. One observer had no experience in diagnosis using CBCT images. Therefore, a specialist in diagnostic imaging explained the CBCT images for interpretation and practiced diagnostic imaging together with this observer, while the other observer interpreted the images independently. Thereafter, the observers re-evaluated the images. Results: The interobserver kappa coefficients (including bilateral RMCs) calculated at the first reading were low, ranging from 0.21 to 0.61. Their values ranged from 0.95 (right side) to 1.00 (left side) after one-on-one practice with a diagnostic imaging specialist, while the values ranged from 0.65 (right side) to 0.66 (left side) without one-on-one practice. Conclusion: Diagnostic accuracy was improved through diagnostic imaging practice. To improve the anatomical interpretation of images, it is important to practice diagnostic imaging with a specialist in diagnostic imaging. One-on-one instruction about diagnostic imaging was an effective method of training.

Keywords

References

  1. von Arx T, Lozanoff S. Retromolar Canal. In: Clinical oral anatomy: a comprehensive review for dental practitioners and researchers. Switzerland: Springer; 2017. p. 369-83.
  2. Lofgren AB. Foramina retromolaria mandibulae. A study on human skulls of nutrient foramina situated in the mandibular retromolar fossa. Odont Tidskr 1957; 65: 552-70.
  3. Kodera H, Hashimoto I. A case of mandibular retromolar canal: elements of nerves and arteries in this canal. Kaibogaku Zasshi 1995; 70: 23-30.
  4. Nortje CJ, Farman AG, Grotepass FW. Variations in the normal anatomy of the inferior dental (mandibular) canal: a retrospective study of panoramic radiographs from 3612 routine dental patients. Br J Oral Surg 1977; 15: 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-117X(77)90008-7
  5. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Ariji E. Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 155-9.
  6. Shen YW, Chang WC, Huang HL, Tsai MT, Fuh LJ, Hsu JT. Assessment of the retromolar canal in Taiwan subpopulation: a cross-sectional cone-beam computed tomography study in a medical center. Tomography 2021; 7: 219-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography7020020
  7. Kuribayashi A, Watanabe H, Imaizumi A, Tantanapornkul W, Katakami K, Kurabayashi T. Bifid mandibular canals: cone beam computed tomography evaluation. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39: 235-9. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/66254780
  8. Nikkerdar N, Golshah A, Norouzi M, Falah-Kooshki S. Incidence and anatomical properties of retromolar canal in an Iranian population: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Int J Dent 2020; 2020: 9178973.
  9. Kikuta S, Iwanaga J, Nakamura K, Hino K, Nakamura M, Kusukawa J. The retromolar canals and foramina: radiographic observation and application to oral surgery. Surg Radiol Anat 2018; 40: 647-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-018-2005-5
  10. Tassoker M, Sener S. Investigation of the prevalence of retromolar canals: a cone beam CT study. Int J Morphol 2017; 35: 1298-302. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000401298
  11. Kang JH, Lee KS, Oh MG, Choi HY, Lee SR, Oh SH, et al. The incidence and configuration of the bifid mandibular canal in Koreans by using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent 2014; 44: 53-60. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2014.44.1.53
  12. Horner K, Islam M, Flygare L, Tsiklakis K, Whaites E. Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 187-95. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/74941012
  13. Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 1977; 33: 363-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529786
  14. Nebbe B, Brooks SL, Hatcher D, Hollender LG, Prasad NG, Major PW. Interobserver reliability in quantitative MRI assessment of temporomandibular joint disk status. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 86: 746-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90215-3
  15. Ossenberg NS. Retromolar foramen of the human mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol 1987; 73: 119-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330730112
  16. Schejtman R, Devoto FC, Arias NH. The origin and distribution of the elements of the human mandibular retromolar canal. Arch Oral Biol 1967; 12: 1261-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(67)90127-6
  17. Naitoh M, Nakahara K, Suenaga Y, Gotoh K, Kondo S, Ariji E. Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: e25-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.08.027
  18. von Arx T, Bornstein MM. The bifid mandibular canal in three-dimensional radiography: morphologic and quantitative characteristics. Swiss Dent J 2021; 131: 10-28.
  19. Patil S, Matsuda Y, Nakajima K, Araki K, Okano T. Retromolar canals as observed on cone-beam computed tomography: their incidence, course, and characteristics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 115: 692-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.02.012
  20. Orhan K, Aksoy S, Bilecenoglu B, Sakul BU, Paksoy CS. Evaluation of bifid mandibular canals with cone-beam computed tomography in a Turkish adult population: a retrospective study. Surg Radiol Anat 2011; 33: 501-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0761-y