DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Change in the Alignment and Distal Junctional Kyphosis Development after Posterior Cervical Spinal Fusion Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy - Risk Factor Analysis

  • Lee, Jung Jae (Department of Neurosurgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Jin Hoon (Department of Neurosurgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Oh, Young Gyu (Department of Neurosurgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Hong Kyung (Department of Neurosurgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Byong Gon (Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University)
  • Received : 2021.07.24
  • Accepted : 2021.10.24
  • Published : 2022.07.01

Abstract

Objective : This study analyzed the risk factors in patients who developed distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) after posterior cervical fusion. Methods : We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 64 patients, aged ≥18 years (51 and 13 male and female patients, respectively), who underwent single-staged multilevel (3-6 levels) posterior cervical fusion surgery due to multiple cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The surgeries were performed by a single spinal surgeon between January 2012 and December 2017. Demographic data, clinical outcomes, and radiological results were collected. We divided the patients into a DJK group and a non-DJK group according to the presence of DJK and investigated the risk factors by comparing the differences between the two groups. Results : Of the 64 patients, 13 developed DJK. No significant differences in clinical results were observed between the two groups before and immediately after the surgery. At the final follow-up, a higher visual analog score for neck pain was observed in the DJK group compared to the non-DJK group (p<0.01). The DJK group had a significantly lower T1 slope and a significantly higher C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) before surgery compared to the non-DJK group (p=0.03 and p<0.01, respectively). Immediately after surgery, the difference between the two groups decreased and no significant difference was observed. However, at the last follow-up, a significantly higher C2-7 SVA was observed in the DJK group (p<0.01). At the last follow up, there is no discrepancy in T1S-CL. In multiple logistic regression analysis, preoperative higher C2-7 SVA and preoperative lower T1 slope were identified as independent risk factors (p=0.03 and p<0.01, respectively). As a result, it was confirmed that DJK occurred along the process of returning to preoperative values. Conclusion : DJK can be considered to be caused by cervical misalignment due to excessive change in the surgical site in patients with low T1 slope and high C2-7 SVA before surgery. This also affects the clinical outcome after surgery. It is recommended to refrain from excessive segmental lordosis changes during multilevel cervical post fusion surgery, especially in patients with a small preoperative T1 slope and a large SVA value.

Keywords

References

  1. Ames CP, Blondel B, Scheer JK, Schwab FJ, Le Huec JC, Massicotte EM, et al. : Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(22 Suppl 1) : S149-S160, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7f449
  2. Cho JH, Ha JK, Kim DG, Song KY, Kim YT, Hwang CJ, et al. : Does preoperative T1 slope affect radiological and functional outcomes after cervical laminoplasty? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39 : E1575-E1581, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000614
  3. Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, Kim JH, Jung JH : Selection of proximal fusion level for adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22 : 394-401, 2013
  4. Daubs MD : Sagittal alignment changes and proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J 16 : 784-785, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.02.019
  5. Ferrara LA : The biomechanics of cervical spondylosis. Adv Orthop 2012 : 493605, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/493605
  6. Ha Y, Maruo K, Racine L, Schairer WW, Hu SS, Deviren V, et al. : Proximal junctional kyphosis and clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery with fusion from the thoracic spine to the sacrum: a comparison of proximal and distal upper instrumented vertebrae. J Neurosurg Spine 19 : 360-369, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.5.SPINE12737
  7. Inaparthy P, Queruz JC, Bhagawati D, Thakar C, Subramanian T, Nnadi C : Incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis with magnetic expansion control rods in early onset scoliosis. Eur Spine J 25 : 3308-3315, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4693-z
  8. Karaikovic EE, Yingsakmongkol W, Gaines RW Jr : Accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement using the funnel technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26 : 2456-2462, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200111150-00012
  9. Kennamer BT, Arginteanu MS, Moore FM, Steinberger AA, Yao KC, Gologorsky Y : Complications of poor cervical alignment in patients undergoing posterior cervicothoracic laminectomy and fusion. World Neurosurg 122 : e408-e414, 2019
  10. Kim B, Yoon DH, Ha Y, Yi S, Shin DA, Lee CK, et al. : Relationship between T1 slope and loss of lordosis after laminoplasty in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine J 16 : 219-225, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.10.042
  11. Kim HB, Lee MK, Lee YS, Sohn JY, Jung SK, Park JH : An assessment of the medial angle of inserted subaxial cervical pedicle screw during surgery: practical use of preoperative CT scanning and intraoperative X-rays. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 57 : 159-165, 2017 https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2016-0161
  12. Kim HJ, Boachie-Adjei O, Shaffrey CI, Schwab F, Lafage V, Bess S, et al. : Upper thoracic versus lower thoracic upper instrumented vertebrae endpoints have similar outcomes and complications in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39 : E795-E759, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000339
  13. Kim HJ, Iyer S : Proximal junctional kyphosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24 : 318-326, 2016 https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00393
  14. Kim TH, Lee SY, Kim YC, Park MS, Kim SW : T1 slope as a predictor of kyphotic alignment change after laminoplasty in patients with cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38 : E992- E997, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182972e1b
  15. Knott PT, Mardjetko SM, Techy F : The use of the T1 sagittal angle in predicting overall sagittal balance of the spine. Spine J 10 : 994-998, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2010.08.031
  16. Livshits G, Cohen Z, Higla O, Yakovenko K : Familial history, age and smoking are important risk factors for disc degeneration disease in arabic pedigrees. Eur J Epidemiol 17 : 643-651, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015503329989
  17. Lowe TG, Lenke L, Betz R, Newton P, Clements D, Haher T, et al. : Distal junctional kyphosis of adolescent idiopathic thoracic curves following anterior or posterior instrumented fusion: incidence, risk factors, and prevention. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 : 299-302, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000197221.23109.fc
  18. McClendon J Jr, Smith TR, Sugrue PA, Thompson SE, O'Shaughnessy BA, Koski TR : Spinal implant density and postoperative lumbar lordosis as predictors for the development of proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity. World Neurosurg 95 : 419-424, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.008
  19. O'Shaughnessy BA, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cho W, Baldus C, Chang MS, et al. : Does a long-fusion "T3-sacrum" portend a worse outcome than a short-fusion "T10-sacrum" in primary surgery for adult scoliosis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37 : 884-890, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182376414
  20. Oe S, Togawa D, Nakai K, Yamada T, Arima H, Banno T, et al. : The influence of age and sex on cervical spinal alignment among volunteers aged over 50. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40 : 1487-1494, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001071
  21. Osterhoff G, Ryang YM, Von Oelhafen J, Meyer B, Ringel F : Posterior multilevel instrumentation of the lower cervical spine: is bridging the cervicothoracic junction necessary? World Neurosurg 103 : 419-423, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.029
  22. Park JH, Jeon SR, Roh SW, Kim JH, Rhim SC : The safety and accuracy of freehand pedicle screw placement in the subaxial cervical spine: a series of 45 consecutive patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39 : 280-285, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000133
  23. Passias PG, Vasquez-Montes D, Poorman GW, Protopsaltis T, Horn SR, Bortz CA, et al. : Predictive model for distal junctional kyphosis after cervical deformity surgery. Spine J 18 : 2187-2194, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.017
  24. Salzmann SN, Derman PB, Lampe LP, Kueper J, Pan TJ, Yang J, et al. : Cervical spinal fusion: 16-year trends in epidemiology, indications, and in-hospital outcomes by surgical approach. World Neurosurg 113 : e280-e295, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.004
  25. Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Kurd MF, Mead L, Millhouse PW, Kumar P, et al. : Is it necessary to extend a multilevel posterior cervical decompression and fusion to the upper thoracic Spine? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41 : 1845-1849, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001864
  26. Schumann B, Bolm-Audorff U, Bergmann A, Ellegast R, Elsner G, Grifka J, et al. : Lifestyle factors and lumbar disc disease: results of a German mu lti-center case-control study (EPILIFT). Arthritis Res Ther 12 : R193, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1186/ar3164
  27. Shufflebarger H, Suk SI, Mardjetko S : Debate: determining the upper instrumented vertebra in the management of adult degenerative scoliosis: stopping at T10 versus L1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(19 Suppl) : S185-S194, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000232811.08673.03
  28. Smith JS, Lafage V, Ryan DJ, Shaffrey CI, Schwab FJ, Patel AA, et al. : Association of myelopathy scores with cervical sagittal balance and normalized spinal cord volume: analysis of 56 preoperative cases from the AOSpine North America Myelopathy study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38 (22 Suppl 1) : S161-S170, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7eb9e
  29. Truumees E, Singh D, Geck MJ, Stokes JK : Should long-segment cervical fusions be routinely carried into the thoracic spine? A multicenter analysis. Spine J 18 : 782-787, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.09.010
  30. Yan P, Bao H, Qiu Y, Bao M, Varghese JJ, Sun X, et al. : Mismatch between proximal rod contouring and proximal junctional angle: a predisposed risk factor for proximal junctional kyphosis in degenerative scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42 : E280-E287, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001883
  31. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, Horie Y, Hida T, Nakashima H, et al. : Placement and complications of cervical pedicle screws in 144 cervical trauma patients using pedicle axis view techniques by fluoroscope. Eur Spine J 18 : 1293-1299, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1032-7