DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis for Trends and Causes of the Decline in Korean Students' Positive Experiences about Science

우리나라 학생의 과학긍정경험 추이 및 하락 원인 분석

  • Received : 2022.02.13
  • Accepted : 2022.04.19
  • Published : 2022.04.30

Abstract

This study analyzed the trends and causes of the decline in Korean students' positive experiences about science (PES). To do this, 4th to 10th grade students were sampled by grade at general elementary, middle, and high schools in Seoul, and then a questionnaire was administered to ask the students about their PES and the causes for their decline. The results of one-way ANOVA for Test for Indicators of Positive Experiences about Science (TIPES) revealed that there were no statistically significant differences according to grade and school level in the overall mean of TIPES scores. However, the results were slightly different for each sub-component. That is, in 'science academic emotion,' the mean of elementary school students was statistically significantly higher than that of middle school students. In addition, the mean of 4th graders was significantly higher than the mean of middle school 1st graders, middle school 3rd graders, and high school 1st graders, respectively. The mean of high school students was statistically significantly higher than that of middle school students in 'science-related career aspiration.' In the 'science-related self-concept', 'science learning motivation,' and 'science-related attitude,' the differences in scores according to grade and school level were not statistically significant. The main causes of the decline in each sub-components of PES were somewhat different depending on the school level. Based on these results, the ways to improve students' PES were sought according to grade and school level.

이 연구에서는 우리나라 초·중·고등학교 학생을 대상으로 학년 및 학교급에 따른 학생의 과학긍정경험의 추이와 하락 원인을 조사하였다. 이를 위해 서울특별시에 있는 일반 초·중·고등학교에서 4학년~10학년 학생을 학년별로 표집한 후, 학생들의 과학긍정경험 및 하락 원인을 묻는 설문을 시행하였다. 과학긍정경험 지표 검사에 대한 일원 분산 분석 결과, 전체 평균에서는 학년과 학교급에 따라 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었다. 그러나 과학긍정경험의 하위 영역별로는 결과가 다소 다르게 나타났다. 즉 과학학습정서에서는 중학생보다 초등학생의 평균이 통계적으로 유의하게 높았으며, 초등학교 4학년의 평균이 중학교 1학년, 중학교 3학년, 고등학교 1학년의 평균보다 각각 유의하게 높았다. 과학관련 진로포부에서는 중학생보다 고등학생의 평균이 통계적으로 유의하게 높은 것으로 나타났다. 과학관련 자아개념, 과학학습동기, 과학관련 태도에서는 학년 및 학교급에 따른 점수 차이가 통계적으로 유의하지 않았다. 과학긍정경험의 하위 영역별 주요 하락 원인은 학교급에 따라 다소 달랐다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 학년 및 학교급에 따라 과학긍정경험을 향상시키는 방안을 모색하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2021년도 교육부 재원으로 한국과학창의재단에서 수행한 연구(D22030029)의 자료를 활용하여 재구성하였음.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
  2. Boe, M. V., Henriksen, E. K., Lyons, T., & Schreiner, C. (2011). Participation in science and technology: Young people's achievement-related choices in late-modern societies. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 37-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.549621
  3. Cho, S., Koo, N., Kim, H., Lee, S., & Lee, I. (2019). OECD programme for international students assessment: An analysis of PISA 2018 results. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research Report RRE 2019-11.
  4. Hampden-Thompson, G., & Bennett, J. (2013). Science teaching and learning activities and students' engagement in science. International Journal of Science Education, 35(8), 1325-1343. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.608093
  5. Jiang, F., & McComas, W. F. (2015). The effects of inquiry teaching on student science achievement and attitudes: Evidence from propensity score analysis of PISA data. International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 554-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.1000426
  6. Jung, J., & Kim, Y. (2014). A study on elementary students' perceptions of science, engineering, and technology and on the images of scientists, engineers, and technicians. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(8), 719-730. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2014.34.8.0719
  7. Kim, H., & Kim, S. (2021). Development of simulation-based scientific inquiry program and exploration of implementation possibility. School Science Journal, 15(5), 423-436. https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.15.5.202112.423
  8. Kim, H. (2022). Korean science teachers' perceptions in PISA survey: Focusing on comparison with the United States and China. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 66(1), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.5012/JKCS.2022.66.1.31
  9. Kim, H., & Koo, N. (2019). Analysis of science instruction in Korea based on the results of PISA questionnaire. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 22(4), 85-104.
  10. Kim, H., Kwak, Y., Kang, H., Shin, Y., Lee, S., & Lee, S.-Y. (2017). A study on the structural equation model among components of positive experiences about science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(3), 507-521. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.3.507
  11. Kim, K., Lee, S., & Noh, T. (2009). The relationships among elementary school students' cognitive, affective, and behavioral characteristics related to science learning and their perceptions toward scientific and/or technological professions. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 28(2), 121-131.
  12. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity [KOFAC] (2015). Development research of draft of 2015 revised subject curriculum II: Science curriculum. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity Research Report BD15110002.
  13. Ku, J., & Koo, N. (2018). The analysis of characteristics and effects of contextual variables in terms of student achievement levels and gender based on the results of PISA 2015 science domain. Journal of Science Education, 42(2), 165-181. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2018.42.2.165
  14. Ku, J., Cho, S., Lee, S., Park, H., & Ku, N. (2017). OECD programme for international students assessment: An in-depth analysis of PISA 2015 results. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research Report RRE 2017-9.
  15. Kwak, Y., & Park, S. (2018). Effect analysis of educational context variables on 8th grade science achievement among top-performing countries in TIMSS 2015. Journal of Science Education, 42(1), 66-79. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2018.42.1.66
  16. Lau, K. C., & Ho, S. C. E. (2020). Attitudes towards science, teaching practices, and science performance in PISA 2015: Multilevel analysis of the Chinese and western top performers. Research in Science Education, 54(2), 415-426.
  17. Lee, J., Ahn, Y., & Kim, D. (2020). Analysis of 2019 national assessment of educational achievement (NAEA): Middle school science. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research Report ORM 2020-23-4.
  18. Ministry of Education [MOE] (2020). Science.mathematics.information.integrated education comprehensive plan ('20-'24): Cultivating people with literacy for intelligent information society and with ability for leading world. MOE press materials (2020. 05. 27.).
  19. Ministry of Education [MOE] (2021). Announcement of the main points of the '2022 revision curriculum'. Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.kr.
  20. Ministry of Science and ICT [MSI] (2021). Establishment of the 4th basic plan to support science and technology talent development ('20-'24): Presenting the vision and goals of talent policy for the next five years to strengthen national science and technology competitivenes. MSI press materials (2021. 02. 26.).
  21. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. Boston: IEA.
  22. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2016). PISA 2015 results (Volume II): Policies and practices for successful schools. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  23. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2019). PISA 2018 results (VolumeII): Where all students can succeed. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  24. Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenges of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
  25. Park, H., Son, Y., & Hong, Y. (2018). The latent profiles of student perception of inquiry activities and teacher feedback in science classrooms: Individual and school factors and affective characteristics. Korean Society for Educational Evaluation, 31(3), 557-582. https://doi.org/10.31158/jeev.2018.31.3.557
  26. Salchegger, S., Wallner-Paschon, C., & Bertsch, C. (2021). Explaining Waldorf students' high motivation but moderate achievement in science: Is inquiry-based science education the key?. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 9(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-020-00092-z
  27. Sang, K., Kim, K., Park, S., Jeon, S., Park, M., & Lee, J. (2020). The trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS): Findings from TIMSS 2019 for Korea. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Research Report RRE-2020-10.
  28. Sheldrake, R. (2016). Students' intentions towards studying science at upper-secondary school: The differential effects of under-confidence and over-confidence. International Journal of Science Education, 38(8), 1256-1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1186854
  29. Shin, Y., Kang, H., Kim, H., Nam, K., Lee, S.-Y., & Lee, S. (2016). Research on index of students positive experiences about science. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity Research Report BD17020012.
  30. Shin, Y., Kang, H., Kim, H., Nam, K., Lee, S.-Y., Lee, S., & Kwak, Y. (2018a). Research on ways to improve students' affective attitudes through monitoring of elementary and secondary science curriculum implementation. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity Research Report BD18040004.
  31. Shin, Y., Kang, H., Kwak, Y., Kim, H., Lee, S.-Y., & Lee, S. (2018b). Research on ways to improve students' affectional attitudes through analyzing the effectiveness of student-participating science classes. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity Research Report BD19020011.
  32. Shin, Y., Kang, H., Kwak, Y., Lee, S.-Y., Lee, S., Lee, I., & Ha, J. (2020). Research on ways to implement sustainable student-participating science curriculum to improve students' affectional attitudes. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity Research Report BD20010018.
  33. Shin, Y., Kwak, Y., Kim, H., Lee, S.-Y., Lee, S., & Kang, H. (2017). Study on the development of test for indicators of positive experiences about science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(2), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.2.0335
  34. Sung, Y., & Im, S. (2019). Effect of science drama participation experience on students' science-related affective domain. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 69(2), 176-186. https://doi.org/10.3938/npsm.69.176
  35. Yoon, J., Park, S., & Myeong, J. (2006). A survey of primary and secondary school students' views in relation to a career in science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(6), 675-690.