KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

GIS Macro Evaluation System for Urban Walk - Focusing on Busan -

도심 보행을 위한 GIS 거시 평가체계 개발 - 부산을 중심으로 -

  • 유연서 (부산대학교 도시공학과) ;
  • 김종구 (부산대학교 도시공학과)
  • Received : 2022.02.21
  • Accepted : 2022.04.08
  • Published : 2022.08.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

It is important to create a decent pedestrian space in order to realize a public space that can ultimately improve the quality of life based on guaranteeing people's right to move while also enhancing urban activity. The goal of this study is to develop a pedestrian path evaluation system in order to lay the foundation for data construction leading to the creation of such elegant walking space. First, a basic system was established in keeping with factors and the space, and this system was used as the basic framework of the study. The trends identified in the literature can be divided into eight categories, denoted here as: Walking safety policy, Walking focused plan, Recognition transition, Transportaion system, Activity-linked walking, Facility utilization walking, Nature and history linked walking and Content convergence walking. The macro- and micro-indices and factors mentioned in related studies were synthesized and classified, and the basis for universality and differentiation was established by integrating them. Next, according to the basic composition of the walking system, Walking potential and slope safety in the Safety category, Basic walking connectivity and Traffic linkage in the Efficiency category, Walking arrangement and Rest convenience in the Health category, and Resource connectivity and Activity abundance in the Comfortability category macro evaluation system of the eight categories were established and a corresponding measurement method was developed.

사람의 이동권 보장과, 도시의 활동성 제고를 기본으로 하여, 궁극적으로 삶의 질을 높일 수 있는 공공공간을 만들기 위해서는 품격 있는 보행 공간 조성이 중요하다. 본 연구는 이런 품격 있는 보행 공간 조성을 위한 자료 구축의 밑거름을 마련하기 위해 보행길 평가체계를 개발하고자 한다. 먼저 요인과 공간을 견지하여 기본 체계를 설정하고 이 체계를 연구의 기본 틀로 하였다. 기존문헌을 통해 알아본 동향은 보행안전정책, 보행중심계획, 인식전환, 교통시스템, 활동연계보행, 시설활용보행, 자연역사연계보행, 콘텐츠융합보행 등 여덟 개의 범주로 나눌 수 있었다. 관련연구들에서 언급된 거시·미시 지표와 요소를 종합하여 분류하고 이를 통합하여 보편성과 차별화를 위한 바탕을 갖추었다. 다음으로 이를 보완하여 보행 체계의 기본 구성에 따라 안전항목에 보행잠재성과 경사안전성, 편리항목에 보행기초연결성과 대중교통연계성, 건강항목에 보행정돈성과 휴식편의성, 매력항목에 경관자원연계성과 활동풍부성 여덟 개의 거시 평가 체계를 설정하고 측정방법을 개발하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 부산연구원 정책연구의 데이터를 활용하여 작성되었습니다.

References

  1. Baek, S. J. and Yoo, S. Y. (2014). "Characteristics of pedestrian-friendly neighborhood environmental factors - focused on ecomobility world festival 2013 Suwon." Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea Urban Design, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 123-139.
  2. Busan Service Analysis Information System (2018). Available at: http://sgis.busan.go.kr (Accessed: January 5, 2018).
  3. Byeon, J. H., Park, K. H. and Choi, S. R. (2010). "The effect of physical pedestrian environment on walking satisfaction - focusing on the case of Jinhae city -." Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 57-656 (in Korean).
  4. Caniggia, G. and Maffei, G. L. (1979). Composizione architettonica e tipologia edilizia 1: Marsilio, Venice. Italia.
  5. Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T. and Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public place-surban spaces. Archtectural Pless, Routledge, Newyork, USA, pp. 78-83.
  6. Conzen, M. R. G. (1960). Alnwick, northumberland: A study in town-plan analysis, Institute of British Geographers Publication, No. 27, George Philip, London.
  7. Habraken, N. J. (1998). The structure of the ordinary, form and control in the built environment, MIT Press, Massachusetts, USA.
  8. Hillier, B., Perm, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T. and Xu, J. (1992). "Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement." Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 20, pp. 29-66. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029
  9. Jeong, Y. N., Lee, G. W. and Kim, S. Y. (2014). "Implications for constructing barrier-free pedestrian environment through the evaluation of street improvement projects - focused on the street improvement program of Seoul." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 11-22. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2014.30.3.011
  10. Joo, Y. J., Lee, S. I. and Kim, T. H. (2011). "Development of web based walking environmental measurement system using the analytic hierarchy process approach." Journal of Korean Society for Geospatial Information Science, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 3-11 (in Korean).
  11. Kim, S. H., Lee, K. J. and Choi, K. C. (2014). "A study on assessment indicator of walking environment considering land use characteristics." Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, KSCE, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 931-938 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2014.34.3.0931
  12. Korea Policy Briefing (2018). Available at: http://korea.kr/news/cultureColumnView.do?newsId=148864205 (Accessed: January 5, 2022).
  13. Kropf, K. (1996). "An alternative approach to zoning in France: Typology, historical character and development control." European Planning Studies, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 717-737. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319608720376
  14. Kropf, K. (2017). "Bridging configurational and urban tissue analysis." Space Syntax Symposium 11th, Lisbon, Vol. 165, pp. 1-13.
  15. Lim, H. W. and Kim, T. H. (2011). "Empirical study of evaluating criteria for pedestrian environments utilizing research paper analysis." Korean Society of Transportation, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 13-23 (in Korean).
  16. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city, MIT Press, Massachusetts, USA.
  17. Marshall, S. (2015). "An area structure approach to morphological representation and analysis." International Seminar on Urban Form, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 117-134.
  18. Matthew (2010). Public places urban spaces, Routledge, London, UK.
  19. Park, B. J., Han, S. J., Lee, W. T. and Park, K. U. (2011). "A preliminary fundamental study on the development of pedestrian environment evaluation model for Korea." Journal of Transport Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 35-49 (in Korean).
  20. Park, K. H., Jung, S. K., You, J. H. and Park, J. W. (2007). "Developing the evaluation indicator of pedestrian environment for promoting walking activity." Journal of the Korean Envitonmental Sciences Sociery, Vol. 16, No. 11, pp. 1231-1238 (in Korean).
  21. Park, S. P. (2018). A basic concept plan for busan walkability, Busan Development Institute, BDI (in Korean).
  22. Park, S. P. (2020). Masterplan for busan walks, Busan Development Institute, BDI (in Korean).
  23. Pont, M. B. and Marcus, L. (2015). 'What can typology explain that configuration can not?' Proceedings of the International Space Syntax Symposium 10th, London, UCL Bartlett, pp.43:1-43:16.
  24. Relph, E. (1984). Place and Placelessness, Pion, London, UK.
  25. Research Institute of Korean Studies, Korea University (2009). Korea university Korean dictionary, Research Institute of Korean Studies, Korea University (in Korean).
  26. Solnit, R. (2001). Wanderlust: A history of walking, Penguin Books, London, UK.
  27. Speck, J. (2014). Walkable city: How downtown can save america, one step at a time, Northpoint Press, USA.
  28. Thiel, P. (1997). People, path, and purposes: Notations for a participatory envirotecture, University of Washington Press, Washington, USA.
  29. Tran, T. D. B. (2011). "Optimizing spatial resolution of imagery for urban form detection." Remote Sensing, Vol. 3, No. 10, pp. 2128-2147. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3102128
  30. Williso, A., Gjersoe, N., Catriona, H. and Jon, K. (2004). "Human movement behaviour in urban spaces." Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 31, pp. 805-828. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3060
  31. World Health Organization (WHO) (1961). Expert committee on the public health aspects of housing No. 225.
  32. World Health Organization (WHO) (2016). Global report on urban health: equitable healthier cities for sustainable development.
  33. World Health Organization (WHO) (2020). Healthy cities effective approach to a rapidly changing world.