DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

One-point versus two-point fixation in the management of zygoma complex fractures

  • Lee, Kyung Suk (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Do, Gi Cheol (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Jae Bong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Min Hyung (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jun Sik (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Nam Gyun (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2022.04.07
  • Accepted : 2022.08.19
  • Published : 2022.08.20

Abstract

Background: The treatment of zygoma complex fractures is of crucial importance in the field of plastic surgery. However, surgical methods to correct zygoma complex fractures, including the number of fixation sites, differ among operators. Although several studies have compared two-point and three-point fixation, no comparative research has yet been conducted on one-point versus two-point fixation using computed tomography scans of surgical results. Therefore, the present study aimed to address this gap in the literature by comparing surgical results between one-point and two-point fixation procedures. Methods: In this study, we randomly selected patients to undergo surgery using one of two surgical methods. We analyzed patients with unilateral zygoma complex fractures unaccompanied by other fractures according to whether they underwent one-point fixation of the zygomaticomaxillary buttress or two-point fixation of the zygomaticomaxillary buttress and the zygomaticofrontal suture. We then made measurements at three points-the zygomaticofrontal suture, inferior orbital wall, and malar height-using 3-month postoperative computed tomography images and performed statistical analyses to compare the results of the two methods. Results: All three measurements (zygomaticofrontal suture, inferior orbital wall, and malar height) showed significant differences (p< 0.05) between one-point and two-point fixation. Highly significant differences were found for the zygomaticofrontal suture and malar height parameters. The difference in the inferior wall measurements was less meaningful, even though it also reached statistical significance. Conclusion: Using three parameters in a statistical analysis of imaging findings, this study demonstrated significant differences in treatment outcomes according to the number of fixations. The results indicate that bone alignment and continuity can be achieved to a greater extent by two-point fixation instead of one-point fixation.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee EI, Mohan K, Koshy JC, Hollier LH Jr. Optimizing the surgical management of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Semin Plast Surg 2010;24:389-97. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1269768
  2. Ward Booth P, Schendel SA, Hausaman JE. Maxillofacial surgery. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1999.
  3. Ellstrom CL, Evans GRD. Evidence-based medicine: zygoma fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132:1649-57. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a80819
  4. Kim JH, Lee JH, Hong SM, Park CH. The effectiveness of 1-point fixation for zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;138:828-32. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2012.1815
  5. Kim SY, Nam SM, Park ES, Kim YB. Evaluation of one-point fixation for zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures using a three-dimensional photogrammetric analysis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;48:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-019-0359-2
  6. Mahmood HN, Rahim AU, Khan WU. Outcome of treatment of zygomatic bone fracture by two point fixation versus three point fixation in Mayo Hospital Lahore. J Pak Med Assoc 2019; 69:1623-27.
  7. Gawande MJ, Lambade PN, Bande C, Gupta MK, Mahajan M, Dehankar T. Two-point versus three-point fixation in the management of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: a comparative study. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2021;11:229-35. https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_75_20
  8. Nasr WF, ElSheikh E, El-Anwar MW, Sweed AH, Bessar A, Ezzeldin N. Two- versus three-point internal fixation of displaced zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2018;11:256-64. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604199
  9. Vatsa R, Priyadarshini P, Singh ADB. Comparison of one point fixation vs two point fixation in the treatment of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures. Int Healthc Res J 2018;2:229-34. https://doi.org/10.26440/ihrj.v2i9.177
  10. Moon SJ, Lee WJ, Roh TS, Baek W. Sex-related and racial variations in orbital floor anatomy. Arch Craniofac Surg 2020;21: 219-24. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2020.00143
  11. Kang HS, Han JJ, Oh HK, Kook MS, Jung S, Park HJ. Anatomical studies of the orbital cavity using three-dimensional computed tomography. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27:1583-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002811
  12. Cho J, Kim Y, Choi Y. Three-dimensional analysis of facial asymmetry after zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture reduction: a retrospective analysis of 101 East Asian patients. Arch Craniofac Surg 2021;22:148-53. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2021.00241
  13. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; c2020 [cited 2022 Aug 19]. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.
  14. Kassambara A. ggpubr: 'ggplot2' Based Publication Ready Plots. R package version 0.4.0. [Internet] c2020 [cited 2022 Aug 19]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggpubr.
  15. Davidson J, Nickerson D, Nickerson B. Zygomatic fractures: comparison of methods of internal fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;86:25-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199007000-00004
  16. Mohammadinezhad C. Evaluation of a single miniplate use in treatment of zygomatic bone fracture. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20:1398-402. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181acdc25
  17. Oh SJ, Kim KS, Choi JH, Hwang JH, Lee SY. Scar formation after lower eyelid incision for reconstruction of the inferior orbital wall related to the lower eyelid crease or ridge in Asians. Arch Craniofac Surg 2021;22:310-8. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2021.00521
  18. Rana M, Warraich R, Tahir S, Iqbal A, von See C, Eckardt AM, et al. Surgical treatment of zygomatic bone fracture using two points fixation versus three point fixation: a randomised prospective clinical trial. Trials 2012;13:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-36