Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Application Status of RDA and Librarians' Perceptions in University Libraries in Korea

국내 대학도서관의 RDA 적용현황 및 사서들의 인식에 관한 연구

  • 조성원 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2022.07.23
  • Accepted : 2022.08.21
  • Published : 2022.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The study aims to investigate the perception of RDA by domestic university library librarians, the current status and plan of RDA application in university libraries, and propose considerations for establishing RDA in domestic university libraries. Through literature review, questionnaire items were prepared to investigate librarians' perception of RDA and the status of RDA in university libraries, and the application status of cataloging rules and education status of cataloging rules in Korea were investigated. Based on the results of the survey, the conversion of the cataloging rules from AACR2 to RDA requires expansion of RDA education and development of curriculum for librarians, and efforts and support such as preparing RDA format and application guidelines at the library level. At the level of national institutions such as the National Library of Korea, implications such as the necessity of enacting RDA application guidelines were presented.

본 연구는 국내 대학도서관 사서들의 RDA에 관한 인식, 대학도서관에서 RDA 적용현황 및 계획을 조사하고 향후 국내 대학도서관에 RDA 목록규칙 정착을 위해서 고려할 사항을 제안하는 데 목적이 있다. 문헌분석을 통해 RDA에 관한 사서들의 인식 및 대학도서관 RDA 현황을 조사하기 위한 설문항목을 작성하였고 국내 대학도서관 목록규칙 적용현황 및 교육현황을 조사하였다. 이를 바탕으로 대학도서관 서양서 목록 담당 사서들을 대상으로 RDA에 관한 사서들의 인식 및 대학도서관 RDA 현황에 관한 설문조사를 실시하였다. 조사 결과에 근거해서 AACR2에서 RDA로 전환하기 위해서는 사서들을 대상으로 한 RDA 교육의 확대 및 교육과정 개발, 도서관 기관 차원에서 RDA 형식 구비, 적용지침 마련 등의 노력 및 지원이 필요하고 국립중앙도서관 등 국가기관 차원에서 RDA 적용지침 제정의 필요성 등의 시사점을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Baek, Ji-Won (2013). Analysis of trends in RDA on-the-job training and its application model in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(3), 379-403. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.44.3.201309.379
  2. Doh, Taehyeon (2002). A study on the historical developments of the rules related with MARC in Korea: focused on KORMARC. Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 36(2), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2002.36.2.055
  3. Kim, Jeong-Hyen (2013). A study on the direction for the revision of Korean cataloguing rules. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science society, 44(4), 123-143. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.4.201312.123
  4. Korea Education & Reserach Information Service (2019a.12.10). Training of Professionals in University Libraries. Available: http://etc.riss.kr/education/course_list.jsp?Mon=13&search_year=2019&edu_name
  5. Korea Education & Reserach Information Service (2019b.12.20). Korea Education & Reserach Information Service Union Catalog. Available: https://unicat.riss.kr
  6. Korea Education & Reserach Information Service (2020.2.10). Academic Information Statistics System. Available: http://www.rinfo.kr
  7. Korean Library Association (2020). 2019 Korea Library Yearbook. Seoul: Korean Library Association.
  8. Lee, Mihwa (2014). A study on the comparison of applying RDA in US academic libraries. Korea Society for Information Management, 31(1), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.1.077
  9. Lee, Mihwa (2019). A study on analyzing the features of 2019 revised RDA. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(3), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.3.201909.97
  10. National Library of Korea (2019.12.1). National Library of Korea Librarian Education. Available: https://edu.nl.go.kr
  11. The Korea University and College Library Association (2019). 2019 University and College Library Yearbook. Seoul: The Korea University and College Library Association.
  12. Haider, S. (2016). Survey of Emerging Cataloging Practices: Use of RDA by Academic Libraries. New York: Primary Research Group.
  13. Hitchens, A. & Symons, E. (2009). Preparing catalogers for RDA training. Cataloging & Classifi cation Quarterly, 47, 691-707. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370903203234
  14. Library of Congress. RDA Classroom Training Plan for 2012 - March 30, 2013 February 27, 2012 (Updated June 15, 2012). Available: https://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/pdf/RDA_Long-Range_Training_Plan.pdf
  15. MacLennan, A. & Walicka, A. (2019). An investigation into cataloguers' experiences with RDA. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52(6), 1-12.
  16. Primary Research Group (2013). The Survey of Academic Library Cataloging Practices. (2013 ed.). New York: Primary Research Group.
  17. RDA Steering Committee (2017). Implementation of the LRM in RDA. Available: http://www.rda-rsc.org/ImplementationLRMinRDA
  18. RDA Steering Committee (2021). About RDA. Available: http://www.rda-rsc.org/content/about-rda
  19. Sanchez, E. R. (2011). RDA, AACR2, and you: what catalogers are thinking. In; Sanchez, E. R. ed. Conversations with Catalogers in the 21st Century. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited, 20-70.
  20. Sanner, E. M. (2012). Preliminary training for RDA: a survey of cataloging department heads. Journal of Library Metadata, 12(2-3), 213-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2012.699845
  21. U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee (2011). Report and Recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee Executive Summary. Available: https://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/source/RDA_report_executive_summary.pdf