DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A new rotational force model for quasi-steady theory of plate-like windborne debris in uniform flow

  • Lin, Huatan (State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University) ;
  • Huang, Peng (State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University) ;
  • Gu, Ming (State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University)
  • Received : 2022.04.05
  • Accepted : 2022.07.25
  • Published : 2022.08.25

Abstract

The force coefficients of rotating plates in the acceleration stage will vary with rotation rate from 0 to stable rotation rate w0, which are important for quasi-steady theory of plate-like windborne debris to simulate the trajectory. In this paper, a wind tunnel experiment is carried out to study the effects of geometry and the Reynolds number on the variations of mean force coefficients of rotating plates. The rotational lift coefficients are sensitive to both geometry effect and Reynolds number effect, while the rotational drag and moment coefficients are only sensitive to geometry effect. In addition, new empirical formulas for the rotational lift coefficient and moment coefficients are proposed. Its accuracy is verified by comparing the predicted results with existing test data. Based on the experimental data of rotating plates, a new rotational force model for quasi-steady theory, which can be applied to a wider scope, is proposed to calculate the trajectory of plate-like windborne debris. The results show that the new model provides a better match with the tested trajectories than previous quasi-steady theories.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study is supported by Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (52178500, 51678452), which are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Baker, C.J. (2007), "The debris flight equations", J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynam., 95(5), 329-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2006.08.001.
  2. Dupleich, P. (1949), "Rotation in free fall of rectangular wings of elongated shape", No. NACA-TM-1201; NACA, Washington, D.C.., USA.
  3. Grayson, M., Pang, W.C. and Schiff, S. (2012), "Threedimensional probabilistic wind-borne debris trajectory model for building envelope impact risk assessment", J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynam., 102(3), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.01.002.
  4. Greenwell, D.I. and Garcia, M.T. (2014), "Autorotation dynamics of a low aspect-ratio rectangular prism", J. Fluids Struct., 49, 640-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.06.004.
  5. Greenwell, D.I. (2014), "Geometry effects on autorotation of rectangular prisms", J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynam., 132, 92-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.06.014.
  6. Holmes, J.D., Letchford, C.W. and Lin, N. (2006), "Investigations of plate-type windborne debris-Part II: Computed trajectories", J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynam., 94(1), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2005.10.002.
  7. Huang, P., Wang, F., Fu, A. and Gu, M. (2016), "Numerical simulation of 3-d probabilistic trajectory of plate-type windborne debris", Wind Struct., 22(1), 17-41. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2016.22.1.017.
  8. Huang, P., Huatan, L. and Ming G. (2020), "Wind tunnel investigation of autorotation of plate: the effects of geometry, Reynolds number and rotation direction", J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynam., 196, 104012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.104012.
  9. Iversen, J.D. (1979), "Autorotating flat-plate wings: The effect of the moment of inertia, geometry and Reynolds number", J. Fluid Mech., 92(02), 327-348. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112079000641.
  10. Kakimpa, B., Hargreaves, D.M. and Owen, J.S. (2012), "An investigation of plate-type windborne debris flight using coupled CFD-RBD models. Part I: Model development and validation", J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynam., 111(12), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.07.008.
  11. Kakimpa, B., Hargreaves, D.M. and Owen, J.S. (2012), "An investigation of plate-type windborne debris flight using coupled CFD-RBD models. Part II: Free and constrained flight", J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynam., 111(12), 104-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.07.011.
  12. Kareem, A. (1986), "Performance of cladding in hurricane Alicia", J. Struct. Eng., 112(12), 2679-2693. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:12(2679).
  13. Kordi, B. and Kopp, G.A. (2009), "Evaluation of quasi-steady theory applied to windborne flat plates in uniform flow", J. Eng. Mech., 135(7), 657-668. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000008.
  14. Kordi, B. and Kopp, G.A. (2011), "Effects of initial conditions on the flight of windborne plate debris", J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynam., 99(5), 601-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2011.02.009.
  15. Kordi, B., Traczuk, G. and Kopp, G.A. (2010), "Effects of wind direction on the flight trajectories of roof sheathing panels under high winds", Wind Struct., 13(2), 145-167. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2010.13.2.145.
  16. Lee, B.E. (1988), "Engineering design for extreme winds in Hong Kong", Hong Kong Eng., 16(4), 15-23.
  17. Lin, N., Letchford, C. and Holmes, J. (2006), "Investigation of plate-type windborne debris. Part i. Experiments in wind tunnel and full scale", J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynam., 94(2), 51-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2005.12.005.
  18. Minor, J.E. (1994), "Windborne debris and the building envelope", J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynam., 53(1-2), 207-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)90027-2.
  19. National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) Research Center (2002), "Wind-borne Debris Impact Resistance of Residential Glazing", Cooperative Agreement H-21172CA; U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research, Washington, D.C., USA.
  20. Richards, P.J., Williams, N., Laing, B., Mccarty, M. and Pond, M. (2008), "Numerical calculation of the three-dimensional motion of wind-borne debris", J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynam., 96(10-11), 2188-2202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.060.
  21. Tachikawa, M. (1983), "Trajectories of flat plates in uniform flow with application to wind-generated missiles", J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynam., 14(1-3), 443-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(83)90045-4.
  22. Tachikawa, M. (1981), "Trajectories and velocities of typhoongenerated missiles, Part I, Aerodynamic characteristics of flat plates and equations of motion", Trans. Architect. Inst. Japan, 314, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijsaxx.302.0_1
  23. Wills, J.A.B., Lee, B.E. and Wyatt, T.A. (2002), "A model of wind-borne debris damage", J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynam., 90(4), 555-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00197-0.
  24. Visscher, B.T. and Kopp, G.A. (2007), "Trajectories of roof sheathing panels under high winds", J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodynam., 95(8), 697-713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2007.01.003.