한국비블리아학회지 (Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science)

한국비블리아학회 (Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

RDA 도입에 대한 사서의 인식 연구 - 대학도서관 사서와의 면담을 중심으로 -

A Study on the Perception of University Librarians on RDA Adoption: Focusing on Interviews with University Librarians

  • 이성숙 (충남대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2022.08.19
  • 심사 : 2022.09.05
  • 발행 : 2022.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 국내 RDA 도입 현황과 RDA 도입에 대한 대학도서관 사서의 인식을 고찰하기 위한 것이다. 이를 위해 국내 도서관 중 RDA를 도입한 2개 도서관의 도입 현황을 분석하였다. 또한, 대학도서관 사서 8명을 대상으로 면담을 시행하였고, RDA 도입 관련 서술형 답변을 수집하고 분석하였다. 면담 조사 결과, 연구참여자들은 RDA에 대해, RDA의 개념은 매우 어렵고 추상적이며, RDA를 적용한 구현 사례가 적고, 단위도서관의 인력과 예산 여건상 RDA 도입은 매우 어려울 것이라고 인식하고 있었다. 연구참여자들이 인식하고 있는 RDA 도입 방안은 RDA에 관한 인식을 개선하고, RDA에 관한 교육을 진행하고, RDA 도입을 위한 하이브리드 서지레코드 구축을 위한 지침을 마련하고, RDA 시범 기관 운영이 바람직하고, 성과 모델을 수립해야 한다는 것이다. 또한, 연구참여자들은 구현을 위해 업체와 조율이 필요하고, 일괄 소급 변환보다는 특정 시점 변경이 바람직하고, 성공 사례를 발굴하고, RDA 관련 온라인 채널을 마련하고, 국가전거 DB를 구축하여 활용하고, 국가적 예산 및 시스템 지원이 필요하다고 인식하고 있었다. 이 연구에서는 연구 결과를 토대로 국내 대학도서관 RDA 도입 방안을 제시하였다.

The purpose of this study is to examine the status of RDA adoption in Korea and the perception of university librarians on RDA adoption. For this purpose, the adoption status of two libraries that adopted RDA among domestic libraries was analyzed. In addition, interviews were conducted with eight university librarians, and narrative responses related to the adoption of RDA were collected and analyzed. As a result of the interview survey, the research participants recognized that the concept of RDA is very difficult and abstract, there are few implementation cases where RDA is applied, and that it would be very difficult to adopt RDA due to the personnel and budget conditions of the local library. The RDA adoption method recognized by the research participants is to improve RDA awareness, conduct RDA education, prepare guidelines for constructing hybrid bibliographic records when RDA is adopted, operate an RDA pilot institution, and establish a performance model. In addition, research participants need coordination with companies for implementation, prefer to change a specific point in time rather than batch retroactive conversion, discover success stories, establish RDA-related online channels, build and utilize national authority DB, and use the national budget and system support. In this study, based on the research results, a plan to adopt RDA for university libraries in Korea was presented.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 충남대학교 교내연구비 지원에 의해 수행되었음.

참고문헌

  1. Baek, Ji-Won (2016). A study on the introduction of RDA in LIS cataloging curriculum. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(3), 403-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.3.403
  2. Cho, Jane (2009). A study for RDA implementation scenarios and future bibliographic control. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 43(3), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2009.43.3.085
  3. Do, Seul-Ki (2014). A Study on user evaluation of an RDA-based bibliography retrieval system. Master's thesis. Sungkyunkwan University Graduate School, Department of Library and Information.
  4. Kim, J. H. (2013). A study on the direction for the revision of Korean cataloguing rules. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(4), 123-143. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.44.4.201312.123
  5. Kim, J. H. (2017). RDA Theory and Practice. Daegu: Taeilsa.
  6. Lee, Mi-Hwa (2010). A study on suggestion for KCR and KORMARC by analyzing work and expression element of RDA in MARC. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(2), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.41.2.201006.251
  7. Lee, Mi-Hwa (2011a). A study on considerations in KCR4 through changes of cataloging rules from AACR2 to RDA. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.1.023
  8. Lee, Mi-Hwa (2011b). A study on application of resource types of RDA to KCR4. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(3), 103-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.103
  9. Lee, Mi-Hwa (2013). A study on consideration in KCR4 through testing the description of content types and media types of ISBD and RDA. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 47(3), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.3.119
  10. Lee, Mi-Hwa (2014). A study on the comparison of applying RDA in US academic libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(1), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.1.077
  11. Lee, Mi-Hwa (2015). A study on the creation of hybrid bibliographic records. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 49(4), 203-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.4.203
  12. Lee, Mi-Hwa (2017). A study on the plan for the display of RDA resource types. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 28(1), 25-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2017.28.1.025
  13. Lee, Mi-Hwa (2018). A study on the bibliographic description of RDA & KCR4 cataloging rules for FRBRizing the aggregates. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 29(1), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2018.29.1.027
  14. Lee, Mi-Hwa (2019). A study on analyzing the features of 2019 revised RDA. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(3), 97-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.201909.97
  15. Lee, Sung Sook (2022). A study on the perception of university librarians on resource description and access. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 33(1), 455-477. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2022.33.1.455
  16. Aboyade, W. A. & Eluwole, O. A. (2018). Implementation of resource description and access (RDA) in Nigeria: awareness, cataloguers' perception and challenges. Journal of Applied Information Science and Technology, 11(2), 79-86.
  17. Atilgan, D., Ozel, N., & Chakmak, T. (2015). RDA in turkey: perceptions and expectations on implementation. Italian Journal of Library and Information Science, 6(2), 163-179.
  18. Cronin, C. (2011). From testing to implementation: managing full-scale RDA adoption at the university of Chicago. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49(7/8), 626-646. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.616263
  19. Ducheva D. P. & Pennington D. R. (2019). Resource description and access in europe: implementations and perceptions. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(2), 387-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000617709060
  20. Haliru, Z. A., Sokari, V., & Bello, S. O. (2016). Perceptions of resource description and access (RDA): a survey of librarians in university libraries in northwestern nigeria. The Nigerian Cataloguer, 3, 28-41.
  21. Mansor, Y. & Ramdzan, E. (2014). RDA perceptions among Malaysian catalogers. Library Review, 63(3), 176-188. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-06-2013-0085
  22. OCLC (2005). Perception of libraries and information resources. Available: http://www.oclc.org/reports/pdfs
  23. Oliver, C. (2009). FRBR and RDA: advances in resource description for multiple format resources. Available: http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/005002/f2/005002-2200-e.pdf
  24. Park, J. R. & Yuji, T. (2015). RDA implementation and training issues across United States academic libraries: An in-depth e-mail interview study. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 56(3), 252-266.
  25. RDA Steering Committee (2022). Overview. Available: http://www.rda-rsc.org/
  26. U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee (2011). Report and Recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee. Available: https://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/source/rdatesting-finalreport-20june2011.pdf
  27. Welsh, A., Carty, C., & Williams, H. (2012). Mind the [trans-atlantic] gap, please: awareness and training needs of UK catalogers. Journal of Library Metadata, 12:2-3, 242-263, https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2012.699854
  28. Yuji, T. & Park, J. R. (2013). RDA: resource description & access - a survey on the current state of the art. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 64(4), 651-662.