Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Establishment of Systematic Review Service for University Libraries in Korea

국내 대학도서관의 체계적 문헌고찰 서비스 구축 방안 연구

  • 이혜영 (동덕여자대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2022.08.23
  • Accepted : 2022.09.17
  • Published : 2022.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to suggest a plan for establishing SR (systematic review, hereinafter called SR) support services in domestic university libraries through a case study of SR support services in overseas university libraries. For this purpose, a total of 119 overseas university libraries were divided into all fields (subjects and disciplines) and the medical field. And A total of 10 areas such as service fields, service subjects, public relations, librarian roles (counselors, collaborators), education, librarian introduction, team member, application form, SR theoretical content, and others were divided and investigated. As a result, the SR support service of the university libraries being investigated is expanding from the medical field to academic fields such as natural science, engineering, and social science. It was confirmed that there were differences in service support hours, services, and whether co-authors were recognized according to the role of the librarian. Educational services are provided to users for the SR support service with a focus on retrieval strategy and skills. In the promotion of the SR support service, the librarian must suggest that it should be included. The importance of SR support services for Korean university libraries should be emphasized through the analysis of SR support services for overseas university libraries, professional search education should be strengthened in the curriculum. Also Organizations related to university libraries such as KERIS have suggested that systematic SR education support is needed for librarians.

본 연구의 목적은 국외 대학도서관의 SR(Systematic Review, 이하 SR) 지원서비스 사례조사를 통하여 국내 대학도서관에서의 SR 지원서비스 구축 방안을 제시하는 것이다. 이를 위하여 총 119개 국외 대학도서관을 대상으로, 전(全) 주제(학문) 분야와 의학 분야로 구분하고 서비스 분야, 서비스 대상자, 홍보, 사서역할(상담자, 협업자), 교육, 사서소개, 팀 구성, 신청양식, SR 이론적 내용, 기타 등 총 10개 영역으로 구분하여 조사하였다. 그 결과 조사대상 대학도서관의 SR 지원서비스는 의학 분야를 시작으로 자연과학, 공학, 사회과학 등의 학문 분야로 확대되고 있으며, SR 서비스를 담당하는 사서의 역할을 상담자와 협업자 역할로 구분하여 각각의 사서역할에 따라 지원 시간과 서비스 내용 및 공동저자 인정 여부에 차이가 있는 것을 확인하였다. SR 지원서비스 이용자를 대상으로 검색전략·기술에 대한 내용을 중심으로 교육서비스를 제공하고 있으며, SR 지원서비스의 홍보는 담당사서의 서비스 주제분야 및 학과와 연구를 위한 팀 구성에서 사서가 반드시 포함되어야 한다는 것을 제시하고 있다. 본 연구조사 분석을 통해 국내 대학도서관에서도 SR 지원서비스에 대한 중요성이 강조되어야 하며 교육과정에서 전문적인 검색교육이 강화되어야 하고, KERIS 등과 같은 대학도서관 유관 단체에서 사서를 대상으로 체계적인 SR 교육지원이 필요하다는 것을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Daum [n.d.]. Daum Dictionary. Available: https://dic.daum.net/search.do?q=conduct
  2. Jacobsen, K. H. (2011). Introduction to Health Research Methods: A Practical Guid. Translated by Kang, Hyung Gon(2015). Introduction to Health Research Methods. Seoul: Koonja.
  3. Jang, Hee Kyoung, Kim, Yun-Su, Kim, Hye-Won, & Lee, Yunjung (2020). Introduction to Health Research Methods (2nd.). Seoul: Gyechuk.
  4. Korea Education and Research Information Service (2019). 2019 Global Trends in Academic Information. Vol. 3. Available: http://librarian.riss.kr/boardArticle/globalTrends2019.do
  5. Presidential Committee on Library and Information Policy of Korea (2019). 2019-2023 Comprehensive Library Advancement Plan. Available: http://www.clip.go.kr/cop/bbs/selectBoardArticle.do#LINK
  6. Shin, Eun-Ja (2020). Medical librarians' contribution to SR searching. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 54(2), 179-195. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2020.54.2.179
  7. Shin, Woo Jong (2015). An introduction of the systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Hanyang Medical Reviews, 35, 9-17. https://doi.org/10.7599/hmr.2015.35.1.9
  8. Bramer, W. M., Rethlefsen, M. L., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2018). Evaluation of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews. Research Synthesis Methods, 9(4), 510-520. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1279
  9. Brandenburg, M. D., Cordell, S. A., Joque, J., MacEachern, M. P., & Song, J. (2017). Interdisciplinary collaboration: librarian involvement in grant projects. College & Research Libraries, 78(3), 272-282. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.3.272
  10. Bullers, K., Howard, A. M., Hanson, A., Kearns, W. D., Orriola, J. J., Polo, R. L., & Sakmar, K. A. (2018). It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(2), 198-207. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.323
  11. Campbell Collaboration (2018). Available: http://archive.campbellcollaboration.org/systematic_reviews/categoryPrinterPage.shtml.
  12. Campbell, J. M. (2017). Quality of systematic reviews is poor, our fault, our responsibility. The Joanna Briggs Institute Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, 15(8), 1977-1978. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003552
  13. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (2009). Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. The Centre. Available: http://www.york.ac.uk/crd/SysRev/!SSL!/WebHelp/SysRev3.htm
  14. Cooper, C., Booth, A., Varley-Campbell, J., Britten, N., & Garside, R. (2018). Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 85. Available: https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-018-0545-3
  15. Crum, J. A. & Cooper, I. D. (2015). Emerging roles for biomedical librarians: a survey of current practice, challenges, and changes. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 101(4), 278-86. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.009
  16. Desmeules, R., Dorgan, M., & Campbell, S. (2016). Acknowledging librarians' contributions to systematic review searching. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 37(2), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.5596/c16-014
  17. Dudden, R. F. & Protzko, S. L. (2011). The systematic review team: contributions of the health sciences librarian. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 30(3), 301-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2011.590425
  18. Folb, B. L., Klem, M. L., Youk, A. O., Dahm, J. J., He, M., Ketchum, A. M., Wessel, C. B., & Hartman, L. M. (2020). Continuing education for systematic reviews: a prospective longitudinal assessment of a workshop for librarians. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 108(1), 36-46. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.492
  19. Foster, M. J. (2017). Assembling the pieces of a systematic review: guide for librarians. In Foster & Jewell, S. T. eds. Systematic Review Process. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 8-9.
  20. Foster, M. J. & Jewell, S. T. (2017). Assembling the Pieces of a Systematic Review: Guide for Librarians. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
  21. Foutch, L. J. (2016). A new partner in the process: the role of a librarian on a faculty research team. Collaborative Librarianship, 8(2), 80-83. Available: http://digitalcommons.du.edu/collaborativelibrarianship/vol8/iss2/6
  22. Galter Health Sciences Library & Learning Center (2020). Systematic reviews: how involving librarian might be your best move. Available: https://galter.northwestern.edu/News/systematic-reviews-how-involving-a-librarian-might-be-your-best-move.pdf
  23. Golder, S., Loke, Y., & McIntosh, H. M. (2008). Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects. Journal of Clinical Epidemiol, 61(5), 440-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.06.005
  24. Gore, G. C. & Jones, J. (2015). Systematic reviews and librarians: a primer for managers. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 10(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v10i1.3343
  25. Harris, M. R. (2005). The librarian's roles in the systematic review process: a case study. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(1), 81-87. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC545126/pdf/i0025-7338-093-01-0081.pdf
  26. Higgins, J. P. T. & Green, S. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews for interventions. Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available: http://community.cochrane.org/handbook
  27. Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., & Page, M. J. (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 6.0. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604
  28. HTA Glossary. HTAGlossary.net. Institut National d'Excellence en Sante et en Services Sociaux (INESSS), n.d. Web. 1 Mar. 2015.
  29. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). (2011a). Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research, Eden J. In: Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
  30. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). (2011b). Standards for systematic reviews 2011. Available: http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2011/Finding-What-Works-inHealth-Care-Standards-for-Systematic-Reviews/Standards.aspx.
  31. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Available: https://www.icmje.org/about-icmje/
  32. Jacobsen, K. H. (2011). Introduction to Health Research Methods: A Practical Guide. 강형곤 옮김(2015). 보건의료 연구방법론. 서울: 군자출판사.
  33. Kitchenham, B. & Brereton, P. (2013). A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 55(12), 2049-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.010
  34. Klem, M. L. & Weiss, P. M. (2005). Evidence-based resources and the role of librarians in developing evidence-based practice curricula. Journal of Professional Nursing, 21(6), 380-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.10.004
  35. Kline, E. & Hangauer, K. [n.d]. Striking a balance: evidence synthesis support for graduate students. Available: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1128&context=gradlibconf
  36. Knehans, A., Dell, E., & Robinson, C. (2016). Starting a fee-based systematic review service. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 35(3), 266-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2016.1189779
  37. Kocher, M. & Riegelman, A. (2018). Systematic reviews and evidence synthesis. College & Research Libraries News, 79(5), 248-252. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.79.5.248
  38. Koffel, J. B. (2015). Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: a cross-sectional survey of recent authors. PLoS One, 10(5), e0215931. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125931
  39. Ludeman, E., Downton, K., Shipper, A. G., & Fu, Y. (2014). Developing a library systematic review service: a case study. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 34(2), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2015.1019323
  40. McKeown, S. & Ross-White, A. (2019). Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 107(3), 411-419. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.443
  41. Meert, D., Torabi, N., & Costella, J. (2016). Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 104(4), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2016.139
  42. Nardini, H. K. G., Batten, J., Funaro, M. C., Garcia-Milian, R., Nyhan, K., Spak, J. M., Wang, L., & Glover, J. G. (2019). Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4(23), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0083-5
  43. Nicholson, J., McCrillis, A., & Williams, J. D. (2017). Collaboration challenges in systematic reviews: a survey of health sciences librarians. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(4), 385-393. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.176
  44. Rader, H. B. (2002). Information literacy 1973-2002: a selected literature review. Library Trends, 51(2), 242-259. Available: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/8423
  45. Rethlefsen, M. L., Farrell, A. M., Trzasko, L. C. O., & Brigham, T. J. (2015). Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(6), 617-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025
  46. Rethlefsen, M. L., Schroter, S., Bouter, L. M., Moher, D., Ayala, A. P., Kirkham, J. J., & Zeegers, M. P. (2021). Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 22(791), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05738-z
  47. Riegelman, A. & Kocher, M. (2018). A model for developing and implementing a systematic review service for disciplines outside of the health sciences. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 58(1), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.58.1
  48. Russell, F. & Muir, R. (2020). A return to librarian mediated searching in a pilot systematic search service. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 69(2), 262-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2020.1749333
  49. Saleh, A. A. & Huebner, F. (2020). Characteristics and impact of librarian co-authored systematic reviews: a bibliometric analysis. medRxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.14.20023119
  50. Slebodnik, M., Cahoy, E. S., & Jacobsen, A. L. (2022). Evidence synthesis: coming soon to a library near you? Libraries and the ACADEMY, 22(2), 273-280. Available: https://preprint.press.jhu.edu/portal/sites/ajm/files/slebodnik.pdf https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2022.0016
  51. Spencer, A. J. & Eldredge, J. D. (2018). Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(1), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.82
  52. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Available: https://guides.lib.unc.edu/c.php?g=148913&p=979577
  53. Wikipedia. Available: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%BD%94%ED%81%AC%EB%9E%80_(%EB%8B%A8%EC%B2%B4)