Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology (한국동물생명공학회지)

The Korean Society of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology (한국동물생명공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Identification of sperm motility subpopulations in Gyr falcon (Falco rusticolus) ejaculate: a tool for investigating between subject variation

  • Received : 2022.09.22
  • Accepted : 2022.09.26
  • Published : 2022.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Subgroups of sperm which share similar motility features documented in mammals indicate between-subject variations that might be related to fertilizing potential of the respective ejaculates. The objectives of this study were to define subpopulations of motile sperm in Gyr falcon semen using kinematic parameters driven by Computer Assisted Semen Analysis (CASA) and to investigate the subject-related variations in these subpopulations. A total of 24 fresh ejaculates from 6 falcons were used to assign each of the 20473 sperms into 3 subpopulations by a multivariate cluster analysis. The proportion of sperms in different sub-populations were compared among subjects by a generalized linear model and repeatability of sperm frequency in different subpopulations was investigated by corelation analysis. The resulting 3 categories of sperm indicated significant differences in all kinematic parameters (p < 0.05). Subpopulation 1 (15.91%) contained sperms with the highest velocity and progressiveness of movement trajectory while subpopulation 3 (6.4%) included the least progressively motile sperms. Proportion of rapid and medium progressive sperm were consistently higher in the ejaculate of three falcons compared to the two other birds which also had the highest proportion of slow non-progressive sperms (p < 0.05). Respective proportion of sperms in each subpopulations indicated significant repeatability over multiple measurements (p < 0.05). In conclusion, subpopulations of motile sperm in Gyr falcon can be identified using kinematic parameters generated by CASA. Individual differences in the proportion of these subpopulations might have potential application for identifying the males with higher fertilizing capacity.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to express their sincere thanks to His Highness Shaikh Mohammad bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice President of the United Arab Emirates and Ruler of Dubai, for their unconditional support.

References

  1. Abaigar T, Cano M, Pickard AR, Holt WV. 2001. Use of computer-assisted sperm motility assessment and multivariate pattern analysis to characterize ejaculate quality in Mohor gazelles (Gazella dama mhorr): effects of body weight, electroejaculation technique and short-term semen storage. Reproduction 122:265-273. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1220265
  2. Bailey TA and Lierz M. 2017. Veterinary aspects of bird of prey reproduction. Vet. Clin. North Am. Exot. Anim. Pract. 20:455-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2016.11.008
  3. Dorado J, Alcaraz L, Duarte N, Portero JM, Acha D, Hidalgo M. 2011. Changes in the structures of motile sperm subpopulations in dog spermatozoa after both cryopreservation and centrifugation on PureSperm(®) gradient. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 125:211-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.03.013
  4. Dorado J, Molina I, Munoz-Serrano A, Hidalgo M. 2010. Identification of sperm subpopulations with defined motility characteristics in ejaculates from Florida goats. Theriogenology 74:795-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.04.004
  5. Ferraz MA, Morato R, Yeste M, Arcarons N, Pena AI, Tamargo C, Hidalgo CO, Muino R, Mogas T. 2014. Evaluation of sperm subpopulation structure in relation to in vitro sperm-oocyte interaction of frozen-thawed semen from Holstein bulls. Theriogenology 81:1067-1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.01.033
  6. Fischer D, Neumann D, Wehrend A, Lierz M. 2014. Comparison of conventional and computer-assisted semen analysis in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) and evaluation of different insemination dosages for artificial insemination. Theriogenology 82:613-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.05.023
  7. Fischer D, Schneider H, Failing K, Meinecke-Tillmann S, Wehrend A, Lierz M. 2020. Viability assessment of spermatozoa in large falcons (Falco spp.) using various staining protocols. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 55:1383-1392. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13785
  8. Flores E, Taberner E, Rivera MM, Pena A, Rigau T, Miro J, Rodriguez-Gil JE. 2008. Effects of freezing/thawing on motile sperm subpopulations of boar and donkey ejaculates. Theriogenology 70:936-945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.05.056
  9. Froman DP, Feltmann AJ, Rhoads ML, Kirby JD. 1999. Sperm mobility: a primary determinant of fertility in the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Biol. Reprod. 61:400-405. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod61.2.400
  10. Froman DP, Pizzari T, Feltmann AJ, Castillo-Juarez H, Birkhead TR. 2002. Sperm mobility: mechanisms of fertilizing efficiency, genetic variation and phenotypic relationship with male status in the domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus. Proc. Biol. Sci. 269:607-612. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1925
  11. Gacem S, Valverde A, Catalan J, Yanez Ortiz I, Soler C, Miro J. 2021. A new approach of sperm motility subpopulation structure in donkey and horse. Front. Vet. Sci. 8:651477. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.651477
  12. Garcia-Herreros M. 2016. Sperm subpopulations in avian species: a comparative study between the rooster (Gallus domesticus) and Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris). Asian J. Androl. 18:889-894. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.188448
  13. Garrett C, Liu DY, Clarke GN, Rushford DD, Baker HWG. 2003. Automated semen analysis: 'zona pellucida preferred' sperm morphometry and straight-line velocity are related to pregnancy rate in subfertile couples. Hum. Reprod. 18:1643-1649. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg306
  14. Hader DP. 1988. Computer-assisted image analysis in biological sciences. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 98:227-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03053794
  15. Holt WV. 1995. Can we predict fertility rates? Making sense of sperm motility. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 31:17-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.1995.tb00001.x
  16. Jepson A, Arlt J, Statham J, Spilman M, Burton K, Wood T, Poon WCK, Martinez VA. 2019. High-throughput characterisation of bull semen motility using differential dynamic microscopy. PLoS One 14:e0202720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202720
  17. Martinez-Pastor F, Garcia-Macias V, Alvarez M, Herraez P, Anel L, de Paz P. 2005. Sperm subpopulations in Iberian red deer epididymal sperm and their changes through the cryopreservation process. Biol. Reprod. 72:316-327. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.104.032730
  18. Martinez-Pastor F. 2021. What is the importance of sperm subpopulations? Anim. Reprod. Sci. Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2021.106844
  19. Mortimer ST, van der Horst G, Mortimer D. 2015. The future of computer-aided sperm analysis. Asian J. Androl. 17:545-553. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.154312
  20. Mortimer ST. 2000. CASA--practical aspects. J. Androl. 21:515-524.
  21. Mortimer ST and Mortimer D. 1990. Kinematics of human spermatozoa incubated under capacitating conditions. J. Androl. 11:195-203.
  22. Muino R, Pena AI, Rodriguez A, Tamargo C, Hidalgo CO. 2009. Effects of cryopreservation on the motile sperm subpopulations in semen from Asturiana de los Valles bulls. Theriogenology 72:860-868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.06.009
  23. Muino R, Tamargo C, Hidalgo CO, Pena AI. 2008. Identification of sperm subpopulations with defined motility characteristics in ejaculates from Holstein bulls: effects of cryopreservation and between-bull variation. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 109:27-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.10.007
  24. Nunez-Martinez I, Moran JM, Pena FJ. 2006. A three-step statistical procedure to identify sperm kinematic subpopulations in canine ejaculates: changes after cryopreservation. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 41:408-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00685.x
  25. Ortega-Ferrusola C, Macias Garcia B, Suarez Rama V, Gallardo-Bolanos JM, Gonzalez-Fernandez L, Tapia JA, Rodriguez-Martinez H, Pena FJ. 2009. Identification of sperm subpopulations in stallion ejaculates: changes after cryopreservation and comparison with traditional statistics. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 44:419-423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01097.x
  26. Parks JE and Hardaswick V. 1987. Fertility and hatchability of falcon eggs after insemination with frozen peregrine falcon semen. J. Raptor Res. 21:70-72.
  27. Quintero-Moreno A, Miro J, Teresa Rigau A, Rodriguez-Gil JE. 2003. Identification of sperm subpopulations with specific motility characteristics in stallion ejaculates. Theriogenology 59:1973-1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01297-9
  28. Ramio L, Rivera MM, Ramirez A, Concha II, Pena A, Rigau T, Rodriguez-Gil JE. 2008. Dynamics of motile-sperm subpopulation structure in boar ejaculates subjected to "in vitro" capacitation and further "in vitro" acrosome reaction. Theriogenology 69:501-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.10.021
  29. Sakkas D, Ramalingam M, Garrido N, Barratt CL. 2015. Sperm selection in natural conception: what can we learn from Mother Nature to improve assisted reproduction outcomes? Hum. Reprod. Update 21:711-726. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv042
  30. Santolaria P, Vicente-Fiel S, Palacin I, Fantova E, Blasco ME, Silvestre MA, Yaniz JL. 2015. Predictive capacity of sperm quality parameters and sperm subpopulations on field fertility after artificial insemination in sheep. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 163:82-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2015.10.001
  31. Valverde A, Castro-Morales O, Madrigal-Valverde M, Soler C. 2019. Sperm kinematics and morphometric subpopulations analysis with CASA systems: a review. Rev. Biol. Trop. 67:1473-1487.
  32. Villaverde-Morcillo S, Soler AJ, Esteso MC, Castano C, Minano-Berna A, Gonzalez F, Santiago-Moreno J. 2017. Immature and mature sperm morphometry in fresh and frozen-thawed falcon ejaculates. Theriogenology 98:94-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.04.051