DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Effects and Evaluation of Movies Education through Application of Rubric

루브릭 적용을 통한 영화교육 평가 및 효과 연구

  • 성창환 (서울장신대학교 신학과)
  • Received : 2022.10.25
  • Accepted : 2022.11.08
  • Published : 2022.11.30

Abstract

In a good class, the elements that make up the class are organically related as a system. Unilateral assessment without sufficient explanation or agreement on assessment criteria, subjective assessment that does not guarantee the reliability of the assessment process and decolonized evaluation separate from the learning process can be a threat to a good class or healthy learning ecosystem. This study analyzed the evaluation through rubric and its effects to solve problems related to educational evaluation. 'Rubrick' is a descriptive evaluation tool that details the criteria for evaluating performance tasks based on class goals and the quality of performance in several stages. The rubric applied for movie literacy evaluation is 'analytical rubric'. It covers literacy to understand movies, movie making literacy and movie utilization literacy. For rubric, learners recognized it as a valid and very useful learning reflection tool.

좋은 수업은 수업을 구성하는 요소들이 하나의 체제로서 유기적 연관성을 갖는다. 평가 준거에 대한 충분한 설명이나 합의 없는 일방적 평가, 평가과정의 신뢰성을 담보할 수 없는 주관적 평가 그리고 학습 과정과 분리된 탈 맥락화된 평가는 좋은 수업이나 건강한 학습생태계를 위협하는 요소가 될 수 있다. 이 연구는 교육 평가와 관련된 문제를 해결하기 위해 루브릭(rubric)을 통한 평가와 그 효과를 분석하였다. '루브릭'은 수업목표를 토대로 수행과제를 평가하는 준거와 수행의 질을 여러 단계로 상세히 묘사한 서술적 평가도구다. 영화 리터러시 평가를 위해 적용한 루브릭은 '분석적 루브릭'으로서 영화 이해 리터러시, 영화 제작 리터러시, 그리고 영화 활용 리터러시를 포괄한다. 루브릭에 대해 학습자들은 타당하고 매우 유용한 학습 성찰 도구로 인식하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Wan-Sik Choi(2005). The Effect of Application of Analytical Rubric on Self-directed Learning, Journal of the Korean Industrial Society, 30(1), 56-75. (최완식. 2005. 분석적 루브릭의 적용이 자기주도학습에 미치는 영향, 대한공업학회지, 30(1), 56-75)
  2. Sun-Hee Park(2012). A Case Study on Movie Literacy Education, study on liberal arts education, 6(1), 269-288. (박선희. 2012. 영화 리터러시 교육에 관한 사례 연구, 교양교육 연구, 6(1), 269-288)
  3. Hyo-Suk Kim(2013). Movie Education for the Revitalization of the Five Senses, study of learning science, 7(30), 159-175. (김효숙. 2013. 오감의 활성화를 위한 영화교육, 학습과학 연구, 7(30), 159-175)
  4. Ah-Chan Lee(2005). The Theory of Movies education-theory and practice. Seoul: Communication Books.
  5. Benjamin, W. E. (1977). Das kunstwerk imzeitalter seiner techniscnen reproduzierbarkeit, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  6. Ponty. M. M. (1964). The film and the new psychology, Sense and Nonsense Jounal, 8(6) 163-183.
  7. Joo-Eun Park. "Lesson Recommendations and Learning Effect of College Movies Class," The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology(JCCT), Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 235-241, March 2022. https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2022.8.2.235
  8. Eun-Sun Choi, Nam-Je Park. "An Educational Program against Digital Drama using Artificial Intelligence," International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology(IJACT), Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 36-41, March 2022. https://doi.org/10.17703/IJACT.2022.10.1.36
  9. Johnston, R. K. (2000). Reel spirituality theology and film in dialogue, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  10. Eisner, E. W. (1996). Evaluating and assessing the visual art in education, CA: Corwin Press.
  11. Eisner, E. W. (1979). The educational imagination, CA: Corwin Press.
  12. Il-Ho Yang, Hyo-Jung Lee(2019). Development of Rubric for Evaluation of Scientific Argument Process, Journal of the Korean Society of Science Education, 29(2), 203-220. (양일호, 이효정. 2019. 과학적 논증 과정 평가를 위한 루브릭개발, 한국 과학교육 학회지, 29(2), 203-220)
  13. Won-Kung Nho(2009). Learning Strategies Using Rubric, design of a good class, 10, 133-153. (노원경. 2009. 루브릭을 활용한 학습 전략, 좋은 수업의 설계, 10호, 133-153)
  14. Nolet, R. V. & McLaughlin, M. J. (2000). Accessing the general curriculum: Including students with disabilities in standard-based reform, New York: Plenum Press.
  15. Cannell, L. M. (2005). Opportunities for 21st century theological education. Common Ground Journal, 2(2), 33-41.