Journal of radiological science and technology (대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학)

Korean Society of Radiological Science (대한방사선과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Production and Utility Assessment of Pediatric Genital Shields Using 3D Printing Technology with Colorjet 3D Printing

결합제 분사 방식 3D 프린팅 기술을 활용한 소아 생식기 차폐체 제작 및 유용성 평가

  • In-Ja Lee (Department of Radiological Science, Dongnam Health University) ;
  • Da-Yeong Hong (Department of Radiological Science, Dongnam Health University)
  • 이인자 (동남보건대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 홍다영 (동남보건대학교 방사선학과)
  • Received : 2023.10.31
  • Accepted : 2023.11.30
  • Published : 2023.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, the aim was to assess the shielding performance of different 3D printing materials, specifically those produced using FDM, SLA, and CJP methods, with a focus on their application as shielding devices in clinical settings. Additionally, the weight of lead shielding materials can evoke reluctance in pediatric patients undergoing X-ray imaging. A total of 12 materials were printed using their respective 3D printers. These materials were then subjected to X-ray testing using diagnostic X-ray equipment and an exposure meter. The goal was to evaluate their shielding capabilities in comparison to 1 mm lead. The results of this evaluation revealed that VisiJet PXL-Pastel, produced using the CJP method, exhibited the highest shielding performance. Therefore, VisiJet PXL-Pastel by CJP method was selected for the creation of a shielding device designed for pediatric reproductive organs. Subsequent tests demonstrated that both the newly created shielding device and conventional lead shielding equipment achieved the same maximum shielding rate at 50 kVp. Specifically, the shielding rate for the 3D printed device was measured at 84.53%, while the conventional lead shielding equipment, categorized as Apron1 (85.74%), Apron2 (99.98%), and Apron3 (99.04%), demonstrated similar performance. In conclusion, the CJP-produced VisiJet PXL-Pastel material showcased excellent radiation shielding capabilities, allowing for anatomical observations of the target organs and their surrounding structures in X-ray images. Furthermore, its lower weight in comparison to traditional lead shielding materials makes it a clinically practical and useful choice, particularly for pediatric applications.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the research grant of the Dongnam Health University.

References

  1. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Status of diagnostic x-ray equipment in the Republic of Korea. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56786/PHWR.2022.15.51.3021
  2. Ministry of Health and Welfare. OECD health statistics 2022. 2023. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2023.46.1.15
  3. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Assessment of radiation exposure of Korean population by medical radiation. Retrieved from https://www.kdca.go.kr/filepath/boardDownload
  4. ICRP. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP. 2007;37. Retrieved from https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%20103
  5. Lim CS, Kim SH. A study on the radiation dose managements in the nuclear medicine department. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society. 2009;10(7):1760-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2009.10.7.1760
  6. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:289-96. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin-Law-2/publication/26684135_Pediatric_64-MDCT_Coronary_Angiography_With_ECG-Modulated_Tube_Current_Radiation_Dose_and_Cancer_Risk/links/5f3a7020458515b72927739a/Pediatric-64-MDCT-Coronary-Angiography-With-ECG-Modulated-Tube-Current-Radiation-Dose-and-Cancer-Risk.pdf
  7. Kim K, Kang S, Noh S, Jung B, Cho C, Heo Y, Park J. Absorbed spectrum comparison of lead and tungsten in continuous x-ray energy using monte carlo simulation. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology. 2012;6(6):483-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2012.6.6.483
  8. Kim JY, Kim JH, Kim HW, Roh JH, Lee KH, Cheon BC, Nam SM. A review of lead poisoning cases reported for recent 30 years in Korea. Korean Journal of Medicine; 2004:17-624. Retrieved from https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/wpr-195200
  9. Bae, M, Lee H. A study on radiation shielding materials for protective garments using Monte Carlo simulation. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management. 2015;43(3):239-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2015.43.3.239
  10. Park KS, Choi WJ, Kim DH. Evaluation of metal composite filaments for 3D printing. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology. 2021;5(5):697-704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2021.15.5.697
  11. Oh WK. Customized model manufacturing for patients with pelvic fracture using FDM 3D printer. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2014;14(11):370-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.11.370
  12. Lee H, Kim D. Assessment of radiation shielding ability of printing materials using 3D printing technology: FDM 3D printing technology. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology. 2018;12(7):909-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2018.12.7.909
  13. Park KS, Kim DH. Evaluation of 3D printing filaments for radiation shielding using high density polyethylene and bismuth. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology. 2022;16(3):233-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2022.16.3.233
  14. Jang HM, Yoon J. Usefulness evaluation and fabrication of the radiation shield using 3D printing technology. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology. 2019;13(7):1015-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2019.13.7.1015
  15. Lee H, Kim D. Assessment of radiation shielding ability of printing materials using 3D printing technology: FDM 3D printing technology. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology. 2018;12(7): 909-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2018.12.7.909
  16. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Korean diagnostic reference level for general radiography and mammography in 2022. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56786/PHWR.2023.16.31.2
  17. Chui SH, Park JE, Chun WK, Ju YJ, Yang NH, Dong KR. Usability evaluation through gonad shielding production of pediatric patients by gender and age rating. Journal of Radiation Industry. 2015;9(2):69-75. Retrieved from https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO201526863114452.page https://doi.org/10.23042/RADIN.2015.9.2.69
  18. Kim YH, Choi JH, Kim SS, Oh YH, Lee CH, Cho PK, ... Kim CM. Evaluation of effective dose during X-ray training in a radiological technology program in Korea. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences. 2018;11(4):383-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2018.08.001
  19. Cho YI. Feasibility of the 3D printing materials for radiation dose reduction in interventional radiology. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2020;43(3):169-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2020.43.3.169
  20. Cho YI, Kim JH. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the shielding device and the organ dose of subject during bone mineral density. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2020;43(3):187-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2020.43.3.187