DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Air Force LVC Training System Using AHP

AHP를 활용한 공군 LVC 합성전장훈련체계 효용성 평가

  • Received : 2023.11.07
  • Accepted : 2023.11.28
  • Published : 2023.12.31

Abstract

In this study, the evaluation items related to the effectiveness evaluation of the LVC (Live, Virtual, Constructive) training system of the Air Force were derived and the weights of each item were analyzed. The LVC training system evaluation items for AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) analysis were divided into three layers, and according to the level, 3 items were derived at level 1, 11 items at level 2, and 33 items at level 3. For weight analysis of evaluation items, an AHP-based pairwise comparison questionnaire was conducted for Air Force experts related to the LVC training system. As a result of the survey, related items such as (1) Achievement of education and training goals (53.8%), (1.2) Large-scale mission and operational performance (25.5%), and (1.2.1) Teamwork among training participants (19.4%) was highly rated. Also, it was confirmed that the weights of evaluation items were not different for each expert group, that is, the priority for importance was evaluated in the same order between the policy department and the working department. Through these analysis results, it will be possible to use them as evaluation criteria for new LVC-related projects of the Air Force and selection of introduction systems.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study has been supported by a Research Fund of Korea Aerospace Industries, LTD(CT23100070).

References

  1. Bezdek, W.J., Maleport, J., and Olshan, R.Z., Live, Virtual & Constructive Simulation for Real Time Rapid Prototyping, Experimentation and Testing using Network Centric Operations, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2009, pp.1-21.
  2. Choi, S.Y., Study on the Architecture of Combat Training Center LVC-System, Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 2008, Vol.11, No.2, pp.80-87.
  3. Funaro, G.V., Measures of Effectiveness for Live, Virtual, Constructive Integrated Architectures, Proceedings in the Huntsville Simulation Conference, HSC, 2009, pp. 70-77.
  4. Gehr, S.E., Schurig, M., Jacobs, L., Van der Pal, J.W., Bennett, Jr., and Schreiber, B., Assessing the Training Potential of MTDS in Exercise First Wave, Neuilly-sur-Seine, NATO RTO, 2008, pp. 1-11.
  5. Henninger, A.E., Cutts, D., Loper, M., Lutz, R., Richbourg, R., Saunders, R., and Swenson, S., Live Virtual Constructive Architecture Roadmap (LVCAR) final report, Institute for Defense Analysis, 2008.
  6. Jang, Y.C., Oh, J.H.,, Myung, H.S., Kim, C.Y., and Hong, Y.S., Development of an ACMI Simulator Based on LVC Integrating Architecture, Journal of The Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space, 2015, Vol.43, No.6, pp. 540-547. https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2015.43.6.540
  7. Jung, B.H., Lim, N.K., and Lee, J.H., Derivation of the Effectiveness Evaluation Indicators of the Air Force LVC Synthetic Battlefield Training System, Journal of the Korean Society of Supply Chain Management, 2022, Vol.22, No.2, pp. 27-39. https://doi.org/10.25052/KSCM.2022.10.22.2.23
  8. Kim G.S., Technology Trend and Development Direction for Integrated LVC Training System, The Journal of The Korean Institute of Communication Sciences, 2017, Vol.34, No.11, pp. 27-35.
  9. Kim, Y.H., Song, Y.S., and Kim, C.O., A Study on the Interoperability of ROK Air Force Virtual and Constructive Simulation, The Korea Society For Simulation, 2019, Vol.28, No.2, pp. 169-177.
  10. Kwon, K.B., Min, S.G., Yee, K.J., Seol, H.J., Oh, J.H., and Sim, I.B., Development of Framework for Effectiveness Measurement of LVC Synthetic Battlefield Training System, Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 2018, Vol.21, No.5, pp. 704-713.
  11. Oh, J.H., Jang, Y.C., Kim, C.Y., Jee, C.K., and Hong, Y.S., V&V of Integrated Interoperability System for LVC Simulation on Aircraft Weapon System, Journal of the KIMST, 2015, Vol.18, No.3, pp. 326-334.
  12. Richards J. Heuer Jr., Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis, trans. Kim, Y.E., Seoul: Pakyoungsa, 2016, pp. 10-13.
  13. Roberts, A.J., A Systems Engineering Approach to Measuring Live, Virtual, Constructive Training Effectiveness and Performance, Air Force Institute of Technology Wright-Patterson AFB OH., United States, 2017.
  14. Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.48, 1990, pp. 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  15. United States Air Force, Air Force Future Operating Concept: A View of The Air Force in 2035, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2015, pp. 7-38.
  16. Won, K.C., Kim, Y.P., Kim, M.S., Ha, T.G., Lee, Y.G., and Lee, H.J., Future and development direction of M&S for building up to the hyper-army in Republic of Korea Army: Focusing on fostering high-tech armed forces, Journal of Advances in Military Studies, 2021, Vol.4, No.2, pp. 37-58. https://doi.org/10.37944/jams.v4i2.113
  17. Yoo, Y.K., A Study on the Analyzing Priority of Limiting Factors in Live, Virtual, and Constructive (LVC) Simulation Interoperability Using AHP Method, Electronic, Theses and Dissertations, 1262, 2015, pp. 40-55.
  18. Yoon, C.H. and Choi, K.D., A Study on the Analytic Hierarchy Process of Group Decision Making Using R, The Journal of Information Technology and Architecture, 2019, Vol.16, No.4, pp. 405-418. https://doi.org/10.22865/JITA.2019.16.4.405