Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Scaffolding Strategies Model by Information Search Process (ISP)

정보탐색과정(ISP)에 의한 스캐폴딩 전략 모형 개발

  • Received : 2023.02.20
  • Accepted : 2023.03.15
  • Published : 2023.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to propose a scaffolding strategy that can be applied to the information search process by using Kuhlthau's ISP model, which presented a design and implementation strategy for the mediation role in the learning process. To this end, the relevant literature was reviewed to categorize scaffolding strategies, and impressions were collected from the students surveys after providing 150 middle school students in the Daejeon area with the project class to which the scaffolding strategy based on the ISP model was applied. The collected data were processed into a form suitable for analysis through data preprocessing for word frequencies to be extracted, and topic analysis was performed using STM (Structural Topic Modeling). First, after determining the optimal number of topics and extracting topics for each stage of the ISP model, the extracted topics were classified into three types: cognitive domain-macro perspective, cognitive domain-micro perspective, and emotional domain perspective. In this process, we focused on cognitive verbs and emotional verbs among words extracted through text mining, and presented a scaffolding strategy model related to each topic by reviewing representative document cases. Based on the results of this study, if an appropriate scaffolding strategy is provided at the ISP model stage, a positive effect on learners' self-directed task solving can be expected.

본 연구에서는 학습 과정의 중재 역할에 대한 설계 및 구현 전략을 제시한 Kuhlthau의 ISP 모형을 활용하여 정보탐색과정에 적용할 수 있는 스캐폴딩 전략을 제안하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 관련 문헌을 검토하여 스캐폴딩 전략을 범주화하고, 대전지역의 중학생 150명을 대상으로 ISP 모형 기반의 스캐폴딩 전략을 적용한 프로젝트 수업을 시행한 후, 이에 대한 소감문 텍스트를 수집하였다. 수집된 자료는 전처리 과정을 거쳐 분석에 적합한 형태로 가공한 후 단어 빈도를 추출하고, STM(Structural Topic Modeling)을 활용하여 토픽 분석을 수행하였다. 먼저, 최적의 토픽 개수를 결정하고 ISP 모형 각 단계별로 토픽을 추출한 후 추출된 토픽을 인지적 영역-거시적 관점, 인지적 영역-미시적 관점, 정서적 영역 관점의 3가지 유형으로 구분하였다. 이 과정에서 텍스트마이닝을 통해 추출한 단어 가운데 인지동사와 감정동사를 중점적으로 살펴보았으며, 대표 문서 사례를 검토하여 각 토픽과 관련된 스캐폴딩 전략 모형을 제시하였다. 본 연구의 결과를 토대로 정보탐색과정(ISP) 단계에서 적절한 스캐폴딩 전략이 제공된다면, 학습자들의 자기 주도적 과제해결에 긍정적인 영향을 기대할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho, Sung-Bae & Ha, Sung-Ho (2020). Analysis of open government data demand using structural topic modeling. The Journal of Information Technology and Architecture, 17(2), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.22865/jita.2020.17.2.103
  2. Jhung, Miran & Sun, Kyu-soo (2013). A study on the changes of elementary EFL teachers' verbal Scaffolding and interaction patterns. Studies in English Education, 18(2), 135-158.
  3. Kang, Echeol (2004). Scaffolding strategies for instructional events using Vygotsky's intervention strategy. Journal of Educational Technology, 20(3), 19-49. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.20.3.19
  4. Kang, Jung-Chan (2009). The Development of Blended Instruction Design Model for Scaffolding: To Apply Design-based Research. Doctoral dissertation, Pusan University, Korea.
  5. Korean Ministry of Education (2022). Introduction to Elementary and Secondary School Curriculum. Korean Ministry of Education Notice No. 2022-33 [Attachment 1].
  6. Kwak, Youngsun (2012). Research on ways to improve science teaching methods to develop students' key competencies. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(5), 855-865. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2012.32.5.855
  7. Lee, Byeong-Ki (2020). Information Literacy Instruction (3rd ed.). Daegu: Taeilsa.
  8. Lee, Jaekeun & Lee, Dong-Han (2004). An analysis of the types of scaffolding in the teacher's guide for elementary school English text books. English Language Teaching, 16(3), 239-256.
  9. Lim, Jeonghoon & Lee, ByeongKi (2022). A study on the perception of Information Search Process(ISP) and the verification of effectiveness of Scaffolding strategy. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 56(4), 239-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2022.56.4.239
  10. Park, Jae-Yong & Lee, Kiyoung (2012). Exploring the components and functions of Scaffolding in open inquiry through factor analysis. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(7), 1204-1221. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2012.32.7.1204
  11. Shin, Anna (2019). Keyword and Topic Analysis on Free Semester Policy Using Big Dat. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul University, Korea.
  12. Suh, Jinwon (2011). A study on the school library assisted instruction as a practical element of constructivism. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(2), 215-236. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.2.201106.215
  13. Berk, L. E. & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding Children's Learning: Vygotskyand Early Childhood Education. 홍용희 번역(1995). 어린이들의 학습에 비계설정: 비고스키와 유아교육. 서울: 창지사.
  14. Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826
  15. Bodrova, E. & Leong, D. J. (1996). Tools of the Mind: The Vygotskian Approach to Early Childhood Education. Prentice-Hall, Inc. 김억환.박은혜 옮김(2003). 정신의 도구: 비고츠키 유아 교육. 서울: 이화여자대학교 출판부.
  16. Bruner, J. S. (1974). From communication to language: a psychological perspective. Cognition, 3(3), 255-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(74)90012-2
  17. Gallimore, R. & Goldenberg, C. (1992). Mapping teachers' zone of proximal development: a vygotskian perspective on teaching and teacher training. In F. Oser, A. Dick, & J._L. Patry (Eds.), Efective and Responsible Reaching: The New Synthesis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  18. Hogan, K. E. & Pressley, M. E. (1997). Scaffolding Student Learning: Instructional Approaches and Issues. MA: Brooline Books.
  19. Kuhlthau, C. C. (1988). Longitudinal case studies of the information search process of users in libraries. Library and Information Science Research, 10(3), 257-304.
  20. Kuhlthau, C. C. (1996). Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Services. 김효정, 이병기 공역(2000). 정보탐색과정론. 경기: 한국디지틀도서관포럼.
  21. Kuhlthau, C. C. (2004). Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Services (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
  22. Many, J. E. (2002). An exhibition and analysis of verbal tapestries: Understanding how scaffolding is woven into the fabric of instructional conversations. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(4), 376-407. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.37.4.3
  23. McNaughton, S. & Leyland, J. (1990). The shifting focus of maternal tutoring across different difficulty levels on a problem-solving task. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8(2), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1990.tb00829.x
  24. Mimno, D., Wallach, H., Talley, E., Leenders, M., & McCallum, A. (2011). Optimizing semantic coherence in topic models. Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 262-272.
  25. OECD (2005). The Definition and Selection of Key Competences: Executive Summary. Paris: OECD.
  26. Palinscar, A. S. & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
  27. Robert, D. R. & Langer, J. A. (1991) Supporting the Process of Literacy Understanding: Analysis of a Classroom Discussion. Albany: National Research Center for the Learning and Teaching of Literature.
  28. Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Airoldi, E. M. (2016). A model of text for experimentation in the social sciences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111(515), 988-1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1141684
  29. Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Tingley, D. (2019). Stm: an R package for structural topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 10(2), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v091.i02
  30. Roehler, L. R. & Cantlon, D. J. (1997). Scaffolding: a powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues, Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
  31. Schetz, K. F. & Stremmel, A. J. (1994). Teacher-assisted computer implementation: a Vygotskian perspective. Early Education and Development, 5(1), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed0501_2
  32. Sigel, I. E. (1982). The relationship between parental distancing strategies and the child's cognitive behaviour. In L. Laosa & I. Sigel (Eds.), Families as learning environments for children. New York: Plenum, 47-86.
  33. Tharp, R. & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, Learning and Schooloing in Social Context. Cambridge University Press.
  34. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Vygotsky and Education: Instructional Implications and Applications of Sociohistorical Psychology. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press, Research Association.
  35. Wallach, H. M., Murray, I., Salakhutdinov, R., & Mimno, D. (2009). Evaluation methods for topic models. Proceedings of the 26th annual International Conference on Machine Learning, 1105-1112.
  36. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x