정보관리학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for information Management)

  • 제40권1호
  • /
  • Pages.95-119
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1013-0799(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-2073(eISSN)
한국정보관리학회 (Korean Society for Information Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

공공기록의 개념 및 범위에 관한 논의

A Study on the Legal Concept and the Scope of Public Records

  • 이경남 (한신대학교 대학원 기록관리학과)
  • 투고 : 2023.02.15
  • 심사 : 2023.03.13
  • 발행 : 2023.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

공공기관이 기록관리의 대상 범위를 규정하는 것은 설명책임을 다하고 국민의 알권리를 보장하기 위한 선결조건이라 할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 공공기록물의 개념에 대해 정책적으로 접근하여 기록의 범위를 정함에 있어 포함해야 할 요건들을 식별하였다. 이를 위해 공공기록물법 및 전자정부법, 전자문서법 등의 현행법에서 정하고 있는 공공기록물의 개념과 범위를 분석하였다. 또한 전자화기록의 법적 증거력에 대해 국내외 사례를 검토하여 제도적 보완사항을 제시하였다.

Public institutions defining the legal scope of records management are a prerequisite to ensure the accountability and public's right to know. In this study, the requirements essential for determining the legal scope of the concept of public records were identified. For this, the concept of policies and the scope of public records which were prescribed by current laws such as the Public Records Management Act, Electronic Government Act, and Framework Act on Electronic Documents and Transactions were analyzed by this study. Furthermore, by examining both domestic and foreign cases on the legal competence of evidence of digitized records, institutional supplementary points were proposed.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2020년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2020S1A5B5A17091141).

참고문헌

  1. Act on The Management of Presidential Archives. Act No. 17573.
  2. Criminal Act. Act No. 17571.
  3. Electronic Government Act. Act No. 18744.
  4. Enforcement Decree of The Public Records Management Act. Presidential Decree No. 32772.
  5. Enforcement Rules of The Public Records Management Act. Ordinance of the Ministry of Public Administration and Security. 340.
  6. Framework Act on Electronic Documents and Transactions. Act No. 18478.
  7. Hwang, jin hyun, Baek, young mi, & Yim, jin hee (2021). Study on public institution dataset identification and evaluation process: focusing on the case of KR electronic procurement system. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 70, 41-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2021.70.041
  8. Jang, Dae Hwan & Kim, Ik Han (2019). Memory, records and archival justice. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 89, 277-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.59.277
  9. Kim, Myungok (2021). A case study on the question & answer of public records management act. Records Management Issue Paper, 29, 3-23. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
  10. Kim, Su Young (2022), A study on the practical implementation of records management of administrative information dataset applying administrative information system classification, The Korean Journal of Archival, Information and Cultural Studies, 1(14), 55-88. https://doi.org/10.23035/KAICS.2022.1.14.055
  11. Korean Society of Archival Studies (2008). Dictionary of Records and Archival Terminology. Seoul: Crritical Review of History.
  12. Lee, Cheolhwan & Zoh, Youngsam (2021). A study on the established requirements for records through precedent analysis: focusing on "Inter-Korean Summit Meeting Minutes Deletion" cases. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 21(1), 41-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2021.21.1.041
  13. Lee, Gemma & Oh, Kyung-Mook (2020). A study on the judgment of authoritative records by applying the concept of authenticity and reliability. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 20(3), 77-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2020.20.3.077
  14. Lee, Gemma (2019). The Concept and Requirements of Establishment of Records. Records Management Issue Paper, vol.02. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
  15. Lee, Jung-eun & Youn, Eun-ha (2018). A study on the major characteristics of the revised ISO 15489 in 2016. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 57, 75-111. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2018.57.075
  16. Lee, Kyong Rae & Lee, Kwang-Suk (2017). Documenting contemporary 'Counter-memories': focused on the Yongsan tragedy. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 53, 45-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2017.53.045
  17. Lee, Kyungnam, Choi, Kwanghoon, & Yim, Jinhee (2021). A study on the role of records center for dataset records management: focused on case study of KR project management system. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 38(3), 263-285. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2021.38.3.263
  18. Lee, Sang-Min (2008). Presidential archives management in crisis: an archival approach to the solutions. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 18, 281-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2008.18.281
  19. Office management regulations. Presidential Decree No. 20331.
  20. Oh, Gilyoung (2012). Injustice in the process of forensic examination on digital evidence: focusing on the so-called 'Wangjaesan' case. Democratic Legal Study, 48, 159-195. https://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15756/dls.2012..48.159
  21. Park, Ji Hye (2019). The recent trend and task on the storage media for preservation. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 63, 227-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2020.63.227
  22. Public Records Management Act. Act No. 18740.
  23. Regulations on administrative efficiency and promotion of collaboration. Presidential Decree No. 31380.
  24. Seol, Moon-won (2019). Exploring the concepts of records as persistent representation of activities. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 59, 5-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.59.005
  25. Seol, Moon-won (2020). Meaning of memory in archival activism. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 67, 267-318. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2021.67.267
  26. Seol, Moon-won (2022). Archival meaning of legal evidence. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 22(1), 219-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2022.22.1.219
  27. Seoul Central District Court 2011gohap1131, 2011gohap1143, 2011gohap1144, 2011gohap1145, 2011gohap1146 (23. Feb. 2012)
  28. Seoul Central District Court 2013gohap1232 (6. Feb. 2015)
  29. Seoul High Court 2012no805 (8. Feb. 2013)
  30. Seoul High Court 2015no622 (24. Nov. 2015)
  31. Sinn, Donghe & Kim, You-seung Kim (2016). Archivists for memory: a theoretical study on archives and memory. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 16(1), 41-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.1.041
  32. Supreme Court of Korea 2013do2511 (26. Jul. 2013)
  33. Supreme Court of Korea 2015do19296 (10. Dec. 2020)
  34. Woo, Jee-Won (2021). A study on ways to recognize the originals of electronic records for records management in the digital era. The Korean Journal of Archival, Information and Cultural Studies, 13, 65-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.23035/kaics.2021.1.13.065
  35. Youn, Eunha & Kim, You-seung (2016). Understanding No Gun Ri records from the perspective of social memory. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 16(2), 57-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.2.057
  36. Youn, Eunha (2019). A study on the concepts of record from a legal perspective. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 60, 89-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.60.089
  37. Zoh, Youngsam (2009). The current status and prospect of presidential records management. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 21, 283-322. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2009.21.283
  38. Disposal of Records. United States Code 44 Chapter33.
  39. Electronic records as documentary evidence. National standard of Canada. CAN/CGSB-72.34
  40. Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act. Public Law 106-229.
  41. Electronic Transactions Act. SBC 2001 Chapter10.
  42. Government of New Brunswick Digitization Standard. Provincial Archives of New Brunswick. 2013.
  43. Information and documentation - Records management - Part 1: Concepts and principles. ISO 15489-1: 2001.
  44. Information and documentation - Records management - Part 1: Concepts and principles. ISO 15489-1: 2016.
  45. InterPARES 2 Project (2008a). Dictionary.
  46. InterPARES 2 Project (2008b). Ontology B: Concept of the status of Transmission of a Record.
  47. Legal Admissibility of Records. Tasmanian Office of the State Archivist. 2020.
  48. NARA (2018). National Archives and Records Administration 2018~2022 Strategic Plan.
  49. Queensland State Archives (2010). Glossary of Archival and Recordkeeping Terms. ICA, Multilingual Archival Terminology.
  50. Shepherd, E. & Yeo, G. (2003). Managing records: A Handbook of Principles and Practice. London: Facet Publishing.
  51. The European Union's Regulation. No. 910.
  52. Uniform Electronic Transaction Act. National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Law. 1999.
  53. Yeo, G. (2008). Concepts of Records (2): Prototypes and Boundary Objects, The American Archivist, 71(1), 118-143. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.71.1.p0675v40tr14q6w2