DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessing the Health Benefits of PM2.5 Reduction Using AirQ+ and BenMAP

AirQ+와 BenMAP을 이용한 초미세먼지 개선의 건강편익 산정

  • Sun-Yeong Gan (Division of Environmental Health, Korea Environment Institute) ;
  • Hyun-Joo Bae (Division of Environmental Health, Korea Environment Institute)
  • 간순영 (한국환경연구원 환경보건연구실) ;
  • 배현주 (한국환경연구원 환경보건연구실)
  • Received : 2023.01.10
  • Accepted : 2023.02.23
  • Published : 2023.02.28

Abstract

Background: Among various pollutants, fine particle (PM2.5, defined as particle less than 2.5 nm in aerodynamic diameter) shows the most consistent association with adverse health effects. There is scientific evidence documenting a variety of adverse health outcomes due to exposure to PM2.5. Objectives: This study aims to assess the health benefits of that would be achieved by meeting the World Health Organization's air quality guidelines for PM2.5 using AirQ+ and BenMAP. Methods: We estimated PM2.5 related health benefits in Korea from implementing the World Health Organization's air quality guidelines (annual average 5 ㎍/m3 and 10 ㎍/m3) and Korea's National Ambient Air Quality Standard (annual average 15 ㎍/m3). We used World Health Organization's AirQ+ and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program. Results: The annual number of avoided PM2.5 related premature deaths exceeding WHO guideline levels was assessed using both AirQ+ and BenMAP. We estimated that the health benefits of attaining the World Health Organization's air quality guidelines for PM2.5 (annual average 5 ㎍/m3) would suggest an annual reduction of 26,128 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17,363~34,024) and 26,853 (95% CI: 18,527~34,944) premature deaths. Conclusions: Our study provided useful information to policy makers and confirms that the reduction of PM2.5 concentration would result in significant health benefits in Korea.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 환경부 국고보조금 사업의 지원을 받아 한국환경연구원이 수행한 「환경보건정보(빅데이터) 분야 환경보건센터(2022-018)」사업의 연구결과로 작성되었습니다.

References

  1. Kioumourtzoglou MA, Schwartz J, James P, Dominici F, Zanobetti A. PM2.5 and mortality in 207 US cities: modification by temperature and city characteristics. Epidemiology. 2016; 27(2): 221-227.
  2. Bowe B, Xie Y, Yan Y, Al-Aly Z. Burden of cause-specific mortality associated with PM2.5 air pollution in the United States. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2(11): e1915834.
  3. Apte JS, Marshall JD, Cohen AJ, Brauer M. Addressing global mortality from ambient PM2.5. Environ Sci Technol. 2015; 49(13): 8057-8066. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01236
  4. Atkinson RW, Kang S, Anderson HR, Mills IC, Walton HA. Epidemiological time series studies of PM2.5 and daily mortality and hospital admissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2014; 69(7): 660-665. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204492
  5. Shah AS, Langrish JP, Nair H, McAllister DA, Hunter AL, Donaldson K, et al. Global association of air pollution and heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2013; 382(9897): 1039-1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60898-3
  6. Requia WJ, Adams MD, Arain A, Papatheodorou S, Koutrakis P, Mahmoud M. Global association of air pollution and cardiorespiratory diseases: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and investigation of modifier variables. Am J Public Health. 2018; 108(S2): S123-S130. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303839
  7. Amoatey P, Sicard P, De Marco A, Khaniabadi YO. Long-term exposure to ambient PM2.5 and impacts on health in Rome, Italy. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020; 8(2): 531-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2019.11.009
  8. Health Effects Institute. State of Global Air 2020: A Special Report on Global Exposure to Air Pollution and its Health Impacts. Available: https://fundacionio.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/soga-2020-report.pdf [accessed 22 December 2022].
  9. World Health Organization. WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines: Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10), Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide, Sulfur Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
  10. Davidson K, Hallberg A, McCubbin D, Hubbell B. Analysis of PM2.5 using the Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program (BenMAP). J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2007; 70(3-4): 332-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390600884982
  11. Bae HJ. Effects of reduced ambient PM10 levels on the health of children in lower-income families. J Environ Health Sci. 2010; 36(3): 182-190. https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2010.36.3.182
  12. Chen L, Shi M, Gao S, Li S, Mao J, Zhang H, et al. Assessment of population exposure to PM2.5 for mortality in China and its public health benefit based on BenMAP. Environ Pollut. 2017; 221: 311-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.080
  13. Bahrami Asl F, Leili M, Vaziri Y, Salahshour Arian S, Cristaldi A, Oliveri Conti G, et al. Health impacts quantification of ambient air pollutants using AirQ model approach in Hamadan, Iran. Environ Res. 2018; 161: 114-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.050
  14. Anenberg SC, Belova A, Brandt J, Fann N, Greco S, Guttikunda S, et al. Survey of ambient air pollution health risk assessment tools. Risk Anal. 2016; 36(9): 1718-1736. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12540
  15. Miri M, Derakhshan Z, Allahabadi A, Ahmadi E, Oliveri Conti G, Ferrante M, et al. Mortality and morbidity due to exposure to outdoor air pollution in Mashhad metropolis, Iran. The AirQ model approach. Environ Res. 2016; 151: 451-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.07.039
  16. Hubbell BJ, Hallberg A, McCubbin DR, Post E. Health-related benefits of attaining the 8-hr ozone standard. Environ Health Perspect. 2005; 113(1): 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7186
  17. Krewski D, Jerrett M, Burnett RT, Ma R, Hughes E, Shi Y, et al. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality. Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009; (140): 5-114; discussion 115-136.
  18. Fann N, Lamson AD, Anenberg SC, Wesson K, Risley D, Hubbell BJ. Estimating the national public health burden associated with exposure to ambient PM2.5 and ozone. Risk Anal. 2012; 32(1): 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01630.x
  19. Fann N, Coffman E, Timin B, Kelly JT. The estimated change in the level and distribution of PM2.5-attributable health impacts in the United States: 2005-2014. Environ Res. 2018; 167: 506-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.08.018
  20. WHO/Europe. AirQ+: Software Tool for Health Risk Assessment of Air Pollution. Available: https://www.who.int/europe/tools-and-toolkits/airq---software-tool-for-health-risk-assessment-of-air-pollution [accessed 5 January 2023].
  21. U.S.EPA. BenMAP-CE User's manual. Available: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-04/documents/benmap-ce_user_manual_march_2015.pdf [accessed 23 February 2023].
  22. Global Burden of Disease Study. Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019) Data Resources. Available: https://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-2019 [accessed 22 December 2022].
  23. Han C, Kim S, Lim YH, Bae HJ, Hong YC. Spatial and temporal trends of number of deaths attributable to ambient PM2.5 in the Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2018; 33(30): e193.
  24. Kim JH, Oh IH, Park JH, Cheong HK. Premature deaths attributable to long-term exposure to ambient fine particulate matter in the Republic of Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2018; 33(37): e251.
  25. Sacks JD, Fann N, Gumy S, Kim I, Ruggeri G, Mudu P. Quantifying the public health benefits of reducing air pollution: critically assessing the features and capabilities of WHO's AirQ+ and U.S. EPA's Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program - community edition (BenMAP - CE). Atmosphere (Basel). 2020; 11(5): 1-15.
  26. Mirzaei A, Tahriri H, Khorsandi B. Comparison between AirQ+and BenMAP-CE in estimating the health benefits of PM2.5 reduction. Air Qual Atmos Health. 2021; 14(6): 807-815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-021-00980-5
  27. Byun G, Choi Y, Gil J, Cha J, Lee M, Lee JT. Health and economic burden attributable to particulate matter in South Korea: considering spatial variation in relative risk. J Environ Health Sci. 2021; 47(5): 486-495. https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2021.47.5.486
  28. Bell ML, Davis DL, Gouveia N, Borja-Aburto VH, Cifuentes LA. The avoidable health effects of air pollution in three Latin American cities: Santiago, Sao Paulo, and Mexico City. Environ Res. 2006; 100(3): 431-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2005.08.002