References
- Institute NC. Cancer statistics: Breast cancer survival. . 2012-2018; Accessed November 6, 2022, at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statistics-network/explorer/application.html?site=55&data_type=4&graph_type=5&compareBy=sex&chk_sex_3=3&chk_sex_2=2&series=9&race=1&age_range=1&stage=101&advopt_precision-=1& advopt_show_ci=on#tableWrap
- Sewart E, Turner NL, Conroy EJ, et al; implant Breast Reconstruction Evaluation (iBRA) Steering Group and the Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative. Patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without biological or synthetic mesh. BJS Open 2021;5(01):zraa063
- Eichler C, Schulz C, Thangarajah F, Malter W, Warm M, Brunnert K. A retrospective head-to-head comparison between TiLoop Bra/TiMesh® and Seragyn® in 320 cases of reconstructive breast surgery. Anticancer Res 2019;39(05):2599-2605 https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13383
- Hansson E, Burian P, Hallberg H. Comparison of inflammatory response and synovial metaplasia in immediate breast reconstruction with a synthetic and a biological mesh: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2020;54(03):131-136 https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2019.1704766
- Ganz OM, Tobalem M, Perneger T, et al. Risks and benefits of using an absorbable mesh in one-stage immediate breast reconstruction: a comparative study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135(03):498e-507e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001027
- Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med 2015;162(11):777-784 https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-2385
- Grow JN, Butterworth J, Petty P. Alternatives to acellular dermal matrix: utilization of a Gore dualmesh sling as a cost-conscious adjunct for breast reconstruction. Eplasty 2017;17:e4
- Headon H, Kasem A, Mokbel K. Capsular contracture after breast augmentation: an update for clinical practice. Arch Plast Surg 2015;42(05):532-543 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.5.532
- Baldelli I, Cardoni G, Franchelli S, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using a polyester mesh (Surgimesh-PET): a retrospective single-center study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137(06):931e-939e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002180
- Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016;355:i4919
- 2020, R.C.T. R. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Accessed November 6, 2022, at: https://www.R-project.org/
- Chen G, Zhang Y, Xue J, et al. Surgical outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction using TiLoop Bra Mesh combined with pectoralis major disconnection. Ann Plast Surg 2019;83(04):396-400 https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001867
- Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125(02):429-436 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82d90
- Colwell AS, Tessler O, Lin AM, et al. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: predictors of complications, reconstruction outcomes, and 5-year trends. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;133(03):496-506 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000438056.67375.75
- Dieterich M, Angres J, Stachs A, et al. Patient-report satisfaction and health-related quality of life in TiLOOP® bra-assisted or implant-based breast reconstruction alone. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2015;39(04):523-533 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0520-x
- Gao P, Wang Z, Kong X, Wang X, Fang Y, Wang J. Comparisons of therapeutic and aesthetic effects of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with and without biological matrix. Cancer Manag Res 2020;12:13381-13392 https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S282442
- Gschwantler-Kaulich D, Schrenk P, Bjelic-Radisic V, et al. Mesh versus acellular dermal matrix in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction - a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016;42(05):665-671 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.007
- Hallberg H, Elander A, Kolby L, Hansson E. A biological or a synthetic mesh in immediate breast reconstruction? A cohort-study of long-term Health related Quality of Life (HrQoL). Eur J Surg Oncol 2019;45(10):1812-1816 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.013
- Hansson E, Edvinsson AC, Elander A, Kolby L, Hallberg H. First-year complications after immediate breast reconstruction with a biological and a synthetic mesh in the same patient: a randomized controlled study. J Surg Oncol 2021;123(01):80-88 https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26227
- Hansson E, Edvinsson AC, Hallberg H. Drain secretion and seroma formation after immediate breast reconstruction with a biological and a synthetic mesh, respectively: a randomized controlled study. Breast J 2020;26(09):1756-1759 https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13921
- Hill JL, Wong L, Kemper P, Buseman J, Davenport DL, Vasconez HC. Infectious complications associated with the use of acellular dermal matrix in implant-based bilateral breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2012;68(05):432-434 https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31823b6ac6
- Liu AS, Kao HK, Reish RG, Hergrueter CA, May JW Jr, Guo L. Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127(05):1755-1762 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820cf233
- Potter S, Conroy EJ, Cutress RI, et al; iBRA Steering Group Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative. Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2019;20(02):254-266 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30781-2
- Schuler K, Paepke S, Kohlmann T, et al. Postoperative complications in breast reconstruction with porcine acellular dermis and polypropylene meshes in subpectoral implant placement. In Vivo 2021;35(05):2739-2746 https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.12558
- Tessler O, Reish RG, Maman DY, Smith BL, Austen WG Jr. Beyond biologics: absorbable mesh as a low-cost, low-complication sling for implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;133(02):90e-99e https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000437253.55457.63
- Nyame TT, Lemon KP, Kolter R, Liao EC. High-throughput assay for bacterial adhesion on acellular dermal matrices and synthetic surgical materials. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128(05):1061-1068 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b65af