References
- Collett DJ, Rakhorst H, Lennox P, Magnusson M, Cooter R, Deva AK. Current risk estimate of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in textured breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;143 (3S A Review of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma):30S-40S https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005567
- Kim IK, Hong KY, Lee CK, et al. Analysis of the molecular signature of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in an Asian patient. Aesthet Surg J 2021;41(05):NP214-NP222 https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa398
- Wixtrom RN, Garadi V, Leopold J, Canady JW. Device-specific findings of imprinted-textured breast implants: characteristics, risks, and benefits. Aesthet Surg J 2020;40(02):167-173
- Maxwell GP, Scheflan M, Spear S, Nava MB, Heden P. Benefits and limitations of macrotextured breast implants and consensus recommendations for optimizing their effectiveness. Aesthet Surg J 2014;34(06):876-881 https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X14538635
- Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Bengtson BP. Natrelle style 410 form-stable silicone breast implants: core study results at 6 years. Aesthet Surg J 2012;32(06):709-717 https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X12452423
- Wong CH, Samuel M, Tan BK, Song C. Capsular contracture in subglandular breast augmentation with textured versus smooth breast implants: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118(05):1224-1236 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000237013.50283.d2
- Stevens WG, Nahabedian MY, Calobrace MB, et al. Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture: a 5-year Sientra study analysis using round, smooth, and textured implants for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132(05):1115-1123 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000435317.76381.68
- Jewell ML, Jewell JL. A comparison of outcomes involving highly cohesive, form-stable breast implants from two manufacturers in patients undergoing primary breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 2010;30(01):51-65 https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X09360700
- Hall-Findlay EJ. Breast implant complication review: double capsules and late seromas. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127(01):56-66 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fad34d
- Maxwell GP, Brown MH, Oefelein MG, Kaplan HM, Heden P. Clinical considerations regarding the risks and benefits of textured surface implants and double capsule. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128(02):593-595 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821eee8c
- Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Pileri SA, et al. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Blood 2016;127(20):2375-2390 https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-01-643569
- Brody GS, Deapen D, Taylor CR, et al. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma occurring in women with breast implants: analysis of 173 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135(03):695-705 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001033
- Magnusson M, Beath K, Cooter R, et al. The epidemiology of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in Australia and New Zealand confirms the highest risk for grade 4 surface breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;143(05):1285-1292 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005500
- Barr S, Hill EW, Bayat A. Functional biocompatibility testing of silicone breast implants and a novel classification system based on surface roughness. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2017;75:75-81 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.030
- Valencia-Lazcano AA, Alonso-Rasgado T, Bayat A. Characterisation of breast implant surfaces and correlation with fibroblast adhesion. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2013;21:133-148 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.02.005
- Clemens MW. Discussion: the epidemiology of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in Australia and New Zealand confirms the highest risk for grade 4 surface breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;143(05):1295-1297 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005588
- Cronin TD, Brauer RO. Augmentation mammaplasty. Surg Clin North Am 1971;51(02):441-452 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(16)39388-4
- Poeppl N, Schreml S, Lichtenegger F, Lenich A, Eisenmann-Klein M, Prantl L. Does the surface structure of implants have an impact on the formation of a capsular contracture? Aesthetic Plast Surg 2007;31(02):133-139 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0091-y
- Cash TF, Duel LA, Perkins LL. Women's psychosocial outcomes of breast augmentation with silicone gel-filled implants: a 2-year prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109(06):2112-2121, discussion 2122-2123 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200205000-00049
- Brohim RM, Foresman PA, Hildebrandt PK, Rodeheaver GT. Early tissue reaction to textured breast implant surfaces. Ann Plast Surg 1992;28(04):354-362 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199204000-00010
- Buonomo OC, Morando L, Materazzo M, et al. Comparison of round smooth and shaped micro-textured implants in terms of quality of life and aesthetic outcomes in women undergoing breast reconstruction: a single-centre prospective study. Updates Surg 2020;72(02):537-546 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00721-w
- Sforza M, Zaccheddu R, Alleruzzo A, et al. Preliminary 3-year evaluation of experience with SilkSurface and VelvetSurface Motiva silicone breast implants: a single-center experience with 5813 consecutive breast augmentation cases. Aesthet Surg J 2018;38(suppl_2):S62-S73 https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx150
- Han S, Kim R, Kim TS, et al. A preliminary retrospective study to assess the short-term safety of traditional smooth or microtextured silicone gel-filled breast implants in Korea. Medicina (Kaunas) 2021;57(12):1370
- Tanner B. Low rate of capsular contracture in a series of 214 consecutive primary and revision breast augmentations using microtextured implants. JPRAS Open 2017;15:66-73 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2017.10.007