DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

AI 활용 역량 강화 교육 프로그램이 중등 과학 예비교사들의 AI 이해, AI 효능감 및 AI 활용에 대한 인식 개선에 미친 효과 분석

Analysis of the Effect of the AI Utilization Competency Enhancement Education Program on AI Understanding, AI Efficacy, and AI Utilization Perception Improvement among Pre-service Secondary Science Teachers

  • 투고 : 2023.01.12
  • 심사 : 2023.03.03
  • 발행 : 2023.04.30

초록

이 연구에서는 중등 과학 예비교사들의 AI 활용 역량 강화를 위하여, 구글의 티쳐블머신을 활용하여 예비교사들이 'AI 기반 분자구조 맞춤형 학습 지원 도구'를 직접 생성해 보는 프로젝트 활동을 개발 및 적용하였다. 이를 위하여, 충청북도 소재 H 대학교 화학교육과에 재학 중인 3학년 예비교사 26명을 대상으로 비교과 활동 시간에 개발된 프로그램을 14차시 동안 적용하였고, 'AI의 작동 원리 이해', '과학 수업에서 AI 활용에 대한 효능감', '과학 수업에서 AI 활용 방안'에 대한 인식을 살펴보았다. 연구 결과, 본 연구에서 개발한 프로그램은 예비교사들에게 머신러닝에 대한 AI 기술의 작동 원리를 기초적 수준에서 이해시키고, 그 사용법을 익히는 데 효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 본 연구에서 개발한 프로그램은 과학 수업에서 AI 활용에 대한 예비교사들의 효능감을 높이는 데에도 효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 예비교사들은 학생들의 과학 개념 이해를 도울 수 있는 새로운 교수학습 전략이자 도구로서 AI 기술의 활용 방안 측면을 인식한 것으로 나타났다. 이에 본 연구에서 개발한 프로그램은 기초적 수준에서 예비교사들의 AI 활용 역량 강화 및 인식 개선 등에 긍정적 영향을 미쳤음을 알 수 있었다. 이에 대한 시사점에 대해 논의하였다.

In this study, in order to strengthen the AI utilization competency of pre-service secondary science teachers, a project activity in which pre-service teachers directly create an 'AI-based molecular structure customized learning support tool' by using Google's teachable machine was developed and applied. To this end, the program developed for 26 third-grade pre-service teachers enrolled in the Department of Chemistry Education at H University in Chungcheongbuk-do was applied for 14 sessions during extracurricular activities. Then, the perceptions of 'understanding how AI works', 'efficacy of using AI in science classes', and 'plans to utilize AI in science classes' were investigated. As a result of the study, it was found that the program developed in this study was effective in helping pre-service teachers understand the operating principle of AI technology for machine learning at a basic level and learning how to use it. In addition, the program developed in this study was found to be effective in increasing the efficacy of pre-service teachers for the use of AI in science classes. And it was also found that pre-service teachers recognized the aspect of using AI technology as a new teaching·learning strategy and tool that can help students understand science concepts. Accordingly, it was found that the program developed in this study had a positive impact on pre-service teachers' AI utilization competency reinforcement and perception improvement at the basic level. Implications of this were discussed.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2021년 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(2020S1A5A2A0104652813).

참고문헌

  1. Alderman, M. (2008). Motivation for achievement: Possibilities for teaching and learning. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  2. Cho, H. J., & Kim, Y. O. (2011). Early childhood teachers' perception of children's misconception encountered during science activities. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 16(6), 1-23.
  3. Cho, K. W. (2004). A critical examination of secondary teacher education for secondary school teachers. Journal of Educational Studies, 35(1), 1-19.
  4. Cho, S. H. (2004). School experience of student teachers in the secondary schools for four weeks. The Journal of Educational Administration, 22(1), 201-224.
  5. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597
  6. Hur, C. S. (2007). Practicum as a place for reconstructing pedagogical knowledge: Experiences of five student teachers. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(1), 95-127. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.25.1.200703.005
  7. Jun, S. J. (2021). Development of artificial intelligence education program based on experiential learning for liberal art education. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 24(2), 63-73.
  8. Jun, S. J., Jeon, Y. J., & Jeong, I. K. (2021). Design of liberal arts subjects for artificial intelligence education for pre-teachers in elementary and secondary schools. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 25(5), 859-869. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2021.25.5.859
  9. Kim, D. R. (2018). Knowledge about science misconceptions and views on correctional strategies of elementary pre-service and in-service teachers. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Science Education, 30(2), 395-408. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2018.04.30.2.395
  10. Kim, H. J., Park, J. H., Hong, S. J., Park, Y. J., Choi, J. Y., Kim, Y. R., Lee, H. S., & Lee, I. S. (2020). A study on how to support the operation of national-level curriculum in preparation for the AI era. Ministry of Education (Publication registration number 11-1342000-000585-01).
  11. Kim, H. S., & Jun, S. J. (2020). Artificial intelligence curriculum design for liberal arts education. Korean Association of Artificial Intelligence Education Transaction, 1(1), 93-100.
  12. Kim, J. Y. (2016). Hello data science. Seoul: Hanbit Media.
  13. Kim, S. A., & Park, J. Y. (2021). Artificial intelligence education status and implications at liberal arts education of universities. Korean Association of Artificial Intelligence Education Transaction, 2(2), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.52618/aied.2021.2.2.4
  14. Korea Foundation for the Advancement Science & Creativity (2020). Elementary and secondary artificial intelligence education content system exploratory research issue report. Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement Science & Creativity.
  15. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (2020). The concept and use of artificial intelligence (AI) in school education. Position Paper, 12(3), 2-21. (Research material ORM 2020-21-3).
  16. Lee, H. J., & Kim, Y. S. (2020). Development of physical computing convergence artificial intelligence(AI) education materials for elementary school using artificial intelligence education platform. The Korean Association of Computer Education's Academic Conference Papers, 24(2), 167-170.
  17. Lee, J. H., Jo, J., & Chae, S. C. (2021). Development of data-driven teaching material for AI convergence education: Focused on damped oscillation. School Science Journal, 15(2), 121-136. https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.15.2.202105.121
  18. Lee, J. H., & Lee, S. H. (2020). A study on experts' perception survey on elementary AI education platform. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 24(5), 483-494. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2020.24.5.483
  19. Lee, J. Y. (2022). Research on the development of teaching and learning model for science and artificial intelligence convergence education - Focused on modeling learning. Korea National University of Education, Master's Thesis.
  20. Lee, S. H. (2020). Analyzing the effects of artificial intelligence (AI) education program based on design thinking process. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 23(4), 49-59.
  21. Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-16.
  22. Ministry of Education (2015). Science and curriculum summary. Ministry of Education Notification No. 2015-74 [Annex 9].
  23. Ministry of Education (2020). Elementary and secondary artificial intelligence education content standards (draft).
  24. Ministry of Education (2021a). 2022 revised curriculum general summary key points (Draft).
  25. Ministry of Education (2021b). Announcement of the results of the 2021 elementary and secondary teacher training college artificial intelligence (AI) education reinforcement support project selection results.
  26. Ministry of Education (2022). 2022 revised curriculum.
  27. Ministry of Science and ICT (2019). Artificial intelligence (AI) national strategy.
  28. Noh, T. H., Seo, I. H., Cha, J. H., Kim, C. M., & Kang, S. J. (2001). The relationships among high school students' conceptual understanding of molecular structure and cognitive variables. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 21(3), 497-505.
  29. Noh, T. H., Yoon, M. S., & Han, J. Y. (2009). Students' comprehension and interpretation process of inscriptions representing the concept of atom and molecule. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 53(3), 355-367. https://doi.org/10.5012/JKCS.2009.53.3.355
  30. OECD (2019). OECD Principles on AI. https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/ai/principles.
  31. Park, S. J. (2021). AI education perception of pre-service teachers according to AI learning experience, interest in AI education, and major. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 25(1), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2021.25.1.103
  32. van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U
  33. Weil, M. M., Rosen, L. D., & Wugalter, S. E. (1990). The etiology of computer phobia. Computers in Human Behavior, 6(4), 361-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(90)90014-8
  34. Yeo, H. W., Yoon, J. H., & Kang, S. J. (2021). Exploratory study on maker education activity based on scientific concept: For university students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 41(5), 359-370. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2021.41.5.359
  35. Yoon, J., Kim, M. H., Kang, S. J., & Choe, H. J. (2022). An exploratory study on AI education contents and methods for elementary and secondary school teachers with non-computer major. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 25(4), 1-18.
  36. Yoon, J., Kim, Y. S., Hwang, Y. S., & Kang, S. J. (2021). Developing a maker education-based experiment design program and exploring its effectiveness for cultivating the experiment design competency of pre-secondary science teachers. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(2), 1385-1416.
  37. Yoon, J., Kwon, J. H., & Kang, S. J. (2019). Verification of effectiveness of design thinking-based maker education program for middle school students. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(10), 561-584.