Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A new proposal for controlled recycling of decommissioning concrete waste as part of engineered barriers of a radioactive waste repository and related comprehensive safety assessment

  • Received : 2022.06.19
  • Accepted : 2022.10.21
  • Published : 2023.02.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As an alternative to conventional management options for a lot of concrete waste from decommissioning of nuclear power plants, a set of scenarios for controlled recycling of decommissioning concrete waste as engineered barriers of a radioactive waste repository was proposed, and a comprehensive safety assessment model and framework covering both pre-and post-closure phases was newly developed. The new methodology was applied to a reference vault-type repository, and the ratios of derived concentration limits to unconditional clearance levels of eighteen radionuclides for controlled recycling were provided for three sets of dose criteria (0.01, 1, and 20 mSv/y for the pre-closure and 0.01 mSv/y for the post-closure phases). It turns out that decommissioning concrete waste whose concentration is much higher than the unconditional clearance level can be recycled even when the dose criterion 0.01 mSv/y is applied. Moreover, a case study on ABWR bio-shield shows that the fraction of recyclable concrete waste increases significantly by increasing the dose criterion for the radiation worker in the pre-closure phase or the duration of storage prior to recycling. The results of this study are expected to contribute to demonstrating the feasibility of controlled recycling of a lot of decommissioning concrete waste within nuclear sectors.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation of Nuclear Safety (KoFONS), granted financial resource from the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC), Republic of Korea (No.2106025).

References

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Power Reactors in the World, Reference Data Series No.2, IAEA, Vienna, 2021.
  2. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Radiological Assessments for Clearance of Materials from Nuclear Facilities, in: NUREG-1640, USNRC, Washington DC, 2003.
  3. VGB Power Tech e.V, Waste Disposal for Nuclear Power Plants, Essen, 2012.
  4. J.H. Cheon, S.C. Lee, C.L. Kim, H.G. Park, Feasibility Study on Recycling of Concrete Waste from NPP Decommissioning Through Literature Review, J. Rec.Const. Resources 6 (2) (2018), 115-112.
  5. K.M. Lee, J.H. Kim, S.H. Kang, Preliminary Evaluation of Decommissioning Wastes for the First Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor in South Korea, world academy of sciences, engineering and technology, Int. J. Nucl. Quantum Eng. 11 (2017).
  6. Ministry of the Environment, History and Current State of Waste Management in Japan. https://www.env.go.jp/en/recycle/smcs/attach/hcswm.pdf. (Accessed 21 December 2021).
  7. Untied States Environmental Protection, Comprehensive Procurement Guideline (CPG) Program, in: https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive-procurement-guideline-cpg-program. (Accessed 10 January 2022).
  8. R. Jin, Q. Chen, An Overview of Concrete Recycling Legislation and Practice in the United States, J. Construct. Eng. Manag. 145 (4) (2019).
  9. J.H. Jeon, Utilization Examples of Recyclable Concrete in Japan, Magaz. Kor. Concrete Ins. 15 (2) (2003).
  10. R. Paul, R. Warwick, Use of recycled crushed concrete for road pavement subbase, in: Proceedings Roads 96 conference, Part 2, 1996.
  11. P. Bodenez, J. Vallet, For a consistent management of radioactive waste: The national plan for the management of radioactive material and waste, ALARA in Radioactive Waste Management, Greece, 2008.
  12. D. D'Arrigo, M. Olson, DOE's Dispersal of Radioactive Waste into Landfills and Consumer Products, 2007.
  13. International Atomic Energy Agency, Recycle and reuse of materials and components from waste streams of nuclear fuel cycle facilities, IAEA-TECDOC-1130, IAEA, Vienna, 2000.
  14. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NRC declares moratorium on BRC implementation; initiated consensus-building process. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0037/ML00 370 2069.pdf, 1991. (Accessed 17 January 2022).
  15. European Commission, Recommended radiological protection criteria for the recycling of metals from the dismantling of nuclear installations, Radiation Protection No.89 (1998).
  16. D. Weiss, A. Artmann, J. Larue, R. Roloff, H. Seher, Development and application of models for the safety analysis of repositories with regard to the clearance of radioactive materials for landfilling, EUROSAFE, 2013.
  17. Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN), France's Seventh National Report on Compliance with the Joint Convention, 2020.
  18. F. Borrmann, Management of very low level radioactive waste in Europeapplication of clearance (and the alternatives), IAEA Regional Workshop on the Release of Sites and Building Structures, 2010.
  19. Government Offices of Sweden, Ministry of the Environment, Sweden's seventh national report under the Joint Convention on the safety of spent fuel management and on the safety of radioactive waste management, 2020. Ds 2020:21.
  20. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency, Recycling and Reuse of Materials Arising from the Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities, NEA No. 7310, OECD/NEA, 2017.
  21. Taro Shimada, Kazuji Miwa, Seiji Takeda, Study on restricted use of contaminated rubble on Fukushima Daiichi NPS site (1) estimation of reference radiocesium concentration for recycling materials, Prog. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 6 (2019) 203-207. https://doi.org/10.15669/pnst.6.203
  22. Kazuji Miwa, Taro Shimada, Seiji Takeda, Study on restricted use of contaminated rubble on Fukushima Daiichi NPS site (2) Validation of reference radiocesium concentration for recycling materials, Prog. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 6 (2019) 166-170. https://doi.org/10.15669/pnst.6.166
  23. International Atomic Energy Agency, Managing Low Radioactivity Material from the Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities, IAEA Technical Reports Series No.462, IAEA, Vienna, 2008.
  24. European Commission, Recycling and Reuse of Radioactive Material in the Controlled Nuclear Sector, EUR-18041, 1998.
  25. G.H. Kim, W.G. Choi, W.J. Oh, G.W. Lee, Assessment of Worker Radiation Dose Due to Controlled Recycling of Concrete Waste Generated from Decommissioning, Proceedings of the Korean Radioactive Waste Society Conference, Korea, 2008.
  26. R. Deju, M. Dragusin, I. Robu, C. Mazilu, C. Tuca, Review on radioactive concrete recycling methods, Rom. Rep. Phys. 65 (2013) 1485-1504.
  27. A. Huntington, R. Cummings, J. Shevelan, T. Sumerling, A.J. Baker, Reuse of low specific activity material as part of LLWR design optimization, in: Proceedings of the ASME 2013 15th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management, ASME, Brussels, Belgium, 2013.
  28. International Atomic Energy Agency, Performance of engineered barrier materials in near surface disposal facilities for radioactive waste, IAEA-TEC-DOC-1255, IAEA, Vienna, 2001.
  29. Tomas U. Ganiron Jr, Recycling Concrete Debris from Construction and Demolition Waste, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 77 (2015) 7-24. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijast.2015.77.02
  30. J.S. Kim, S. Kwon, J.W. Choi, G.C. Cho, Properties of low pH cement grout as a sealing material for the geological disposal of radioactive waste, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 43 (5) (2011) 459-468. https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.2011.43.5.459
  31. Malawi Bureau of Standards, Cement-Part 1, Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements, ICS 91.100.10, Division of Mathematical Sciences, 2018.
  32. International Atomic Energy Agency, Safety Assessment Methodologies for Near Surface Disposal Facilities: Results of a Coordinated Research Project, Vol.2, IAEA, Vienna, 2004.
  33. International Atomic Energy Agency, Application of Exemption Principles to the Recycle and Reuse of Materials from Nuclear Facilities, IAEA Safety Series No.111-P-1.1, IAEA, Vienna, 1992.
  34. M. Pfingston, J. Arnish, D. LePoire, S.-Y. Chen, TSD-DOSE: A Radiological Dose Assessment Model for Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities, ANL/EAD/LD-4, 1998.
  35. International Atomic Energy Agency, Methodologies for Assessing the Induced Activation Source Term for Use in Decommissioning Applications, IAEA Safety Reports Series No. 95, IAEA, Vienna, 2019.
  36. International Atomic Energy Agency, Radiological Characterization of Shut Down Nuclear Reactors for Decommissioning Purposes, IAEA Technical Reports Series No. 389, IAEA, Vienna, 1998.
  37. K. Rubner, B. Meng, U. Muller, Investigating the Original Water Content of Concrete, Non-destructive Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Structures: Deterioration Processes and Standard Test Methods, 2010, pp. 217-241.
  38. Dynamic concrete pumping Inc, Different types of concrete. https://www.dcpu1.com/blog/different-types-of-concrete/. (Accessed 26 April 2022).
  39. H.J. Byeon, G.Y. Jeong, J.Y. Park, Structural stability analysis of waste packages containing low-and intermediate-level radioactive waste in a silo-type repository, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 53 (5) (2021) 1524-1533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.10.019
  40. George Wardeh, Elhem Ghorbel, Hector Gomart, Mix Design and Properties of Recycled Aggregate Concretes: Applicability of Eurocode 2, Int. J. Concrete Struct. Mater. 9 (1) (2015) 1-20.
  41. Ammar Ben Nakhi, Jasem M. Alhumoud, Effects of Recycled Aggregate on Concrete Mix and Exposure to Chloride, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. (2019).
  42. Pavlu Tereza, Koci Vladimir, Sefflov a Magdalena, Study replacement of cement with recycled cement, Powder and the Environmental Assessment, Solid State Phenomena 249 (2016) 136-141. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.249.136
  43. International Atomic Energy Agency, Derivation of Activity Concentration Values for Exclusion, Exemption and Clearance, IAEA Safety Reports Series No.44, IAEA, Austria, 2005.
  44. International Commission on Radiological Protection, Conversion Coefficients for Radiological Protection Quantities for External Radiation Exposures, ICRP publication 116, Ann. ICRP 40 (2-5) (2010).
  45. J.J. Cheng, B. Kassas, C. Yu, D. LePoire, J. Arnish, Resrad-Recycle, A computer model for analyzing the radiological doses and risks resulting from the recycling of radioactive scrap metal and the reuse of surface-contaminated material and rquipment, ANL/EAD-3, 2000.
  46. Environmental Restoration Group, Inc, MicroShield and MCNP5 Modeling of Natural Uranium Ore Mined Using Ablation Technology, 2016.
  47. International Atomic Energy Agency, Derivation of activity limits for the disposal of radioactive waste in near surface disposal facilities, IAEA-TECDOC-1380, IAEA, Austria, 2003.
  48. International Atomic Energy Agency, Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards, General Safety Requirements Part 3, IAEA, Vienna, 2014.
  49. Nuclear Safety, Security Commission, Radiological Protection Criteria for Long-Term Safety on Low and Intermediate Level Radioactive Waste Disposal, 2017. Notice No.2017-62.
  50. B.Y. Min, W.K. Choi, K. Lee, Separation of clean aggregates from contaminated concrete waste by thermal and mechanical treatment, Ann. Nucl. Energy 37 (2010) 16-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.10.010
  51. S. Yehia, K. Helal, A. Abusharkh, A. Zaher, H. Istaitiyeh, Strength and Durability Evaluation of Recycled Aggregate Concrete, Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 9 (2015) 219-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-015-0100-0
  52. T.D. Taulbee, K.A. McCartney, R. Traub, M.H. Smith, J.W. Neton, Implementation of ICRP 116 dose conversion coefficients for reconstructing organ dose in a radiation compensation Program, Radiat. Protect. Dosim. 173 (2017) 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncw305
  53. Li-qun Yang, Yong-kuo Liu, Min-jun Peng, Abiodun Ayodeji, Nan Chao, Voxel-based point kernel method for dose rate assessment of non-uniform activity and self-shielding sources in nuclear facility decommissioning, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 164 (2019).
  54. A.D. Oliveira, C. Oliveira, Comparison of deterministic and Monte Carlo methods in shielding design, Radiat. Protect. Dosim. 115 (2005) 254-257. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nci187
  55. International Commission on Radiological Protection, Data for use in protection against external radiation, ICRP publication 51, Ann. ICRP 17 (2-3) (1987).
  56. International Commission on Radiological Protection, Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides: Part 1, ICRP publication 130, Ann. ICRP 44 (2) (2015).
  57. Swiss Federal Council, Radiation Protection Ordinance, 2017. https://fedlex.data.admin.ch/filestore/fedlex.data.admin.ch/eli/cc/2017/502/20190201/en/pdf-a/fedlex-data-admin-ch-eli-cc-2017-502-20190201-en-pdf-a.pdf. (Accessed 17 June 2022).
  58. Untied States Environmental Protection Agency, External Exposure to Radionuclides in Air, Water, and Soil. Federal Guidance Report No. 15, EPA-402/R19/002, 2019.
  59. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Exposure Factors Handbook, EPA/600/R-09/052F, 2011.
  60. International Atomic Energy Agency, Safety Assessment Methodologies for Near Surface Disposal Facilities, 1, IAEA, Vienna, 2004.
  61. International Atomic Energy Agency, Safe and effective nuclear power plant life cycle management towards decommissioning, IAEA-TECDOC-1305, IAEA, Vienna, 2002.
  62. B. Heuel-Fabianek, Partition Coefficients (Kd) for the Modelling of Transport Processes of Radionuclides in Groundwater, Jul-4375, 2014.
  63. T. Sullivan, Evaluation of Maximum Radionuclide Groundwater Concentrations for Basement Fill Model, BNL-107250-2014-IR, 2016.
  64. M.H. Baik, S.Y. Lee, J.K. Lee, S.S. Kim, C.K. Park, J.W. Choi, Review and compilation of data on radionuclide migration and retardation for the performance assessment of a HLW repository in Korea, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 40 (7) (2008).
  65. Idaho National Laboratory, Evaluation of Groundwater Impacts to Support the National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Assessment for the INL Remote-Handled Low-Level Waste Disposal Project, INL/EXT-10-19168, 2011.
  66. S. Kato, H. Yabuta, Distribution Coefficients Used for Safety Assessment for Shallow Land Radioactive Waste Burial, J. Atom. Energy Soc. Jpn. 28 (4) (1986).
  67. I.G. McKinley, A. Scholtis, Compilation and Comparison of Radionuclide Sorption Databases Used in Recent Performance Assessments, 1997.
  68. E.L. Wilhite, Preliminary Performance Assessment for Disposal of APT and CLWR/TEF Wastes at SRS, WSRC-RP-98-01055, 1998.
  69. J. Crawford. Quantification of rock matrix Kd data and uncertainties for SRPSU, SKB R-13-38, 2013.
  70. United States Department of Energy, A Compendium of Transfer Factors for Agricultural and Animal Products, PNNL-13421, 2003.
  71. International Atomic Energy Agency, Handbook of Parameter Values for the Prediction of Radionuclide Transfer in Terrestrial and Freshwater Environments, Technical Reports Series No.472, IAEA, Vienna, 2010.
  72. P. Osborne, Safety Assessment Code Development and Application Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, DOC-WMF, 2017.
  73. International Commission on Radiological Protection, Compendium of Dose Coefficients based on ICRP Publication 60, ICRP publication 119, Ann. ICRP 41, 2012.
  74. Nuclear Safety, Security Commission, Regulations on the Radioactive Waste Classification and Clearance of Radioactive Waste, 2020. Notice No.2020-6.
  75. Yen-Fu Chen, Yen-Kung Lin, Rong-Jiun Sheu, Shiang-Huei Jiang, Evaluation of Radionuclides in Concrete Shielding for Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning, Nucl. Technol. 168 (2) (2009) 508-512. https://doi.org/10.13182/NT09-A9234
  76. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Neutron Activation and Activation Analysis; NRC/HR-0751-H122, USNRC, Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
  77. International Atomic Energy Agency, Atlas of Neutron Capture Cross Sections. https://www-nds.iaea.org/ngatlas2/. (Accessed 5 June 2022).
  78. International Atomic Energy Agency, Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF). https://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/endf.htm. (Accessed 5 June 2022).
  79. J.C. Evans, E.L. Lepel, R.W. Sanders, C.L. Wilkerson, W. Silker, C.W. Thomas, K.H. Abel, D.R. Robertson, Long-lived Activation Products in Reactor Materials, NUREG/CR-3474, 1984.
  80. M. Kinno, et al., Low-Activation Multilayer Shielding Structure of Light Water Reactor Using Various Types of Low-Activation Concrete, Prog. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 1 (2011) 28-31. https://doi.org/10.15669/pnst.1.28
  81. B.C. Lee, Y.U. Kim, W.S. L'yi, J.H. Kim, B.K. Seo, S.B. Hong, Radiological analysis for radioactivity depth distribution in activated concrete using gamma-ray spectrometry, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 169 (2021).
  82. GE Nuclear Energy, ABWR Design Control Document, 1997.
  83. K.H. Park, S.H. Son, J.H. Oh, S.K. Kim, Sustainable Decommissioning Strategies for Nuclear Power Plants: A Systematic Literature Review, Sustainability 14 (10) (2022).
  84. Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen, Decommissioning and Dismantling, 2019.
  85. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency, Selecting strategies for the decommissioning of nuclear facilities, NEA No 6038 (2006).
  86. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Staff Responses to Frequently Asked Questions Concerning Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-1628, Washington DC, 2000.
  87. Federal Office for the Safety of Nuclear Waste Management, Storage capacities for radioactive residues and waste from decommissioning projects. https://www.base.bund.de/EN/ns/decommissioning/storage-capacities/storagecapacities_node.html. (Accessed 21 September 2022).