Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회지)

Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Normative Approach to Data Democracy

데이터 민주주의(data democracy)에 대한 규범적 접근

  • 박희진 (한성대학교 크리에이티브인문학부 디지털인문정보학트랙) ;
  • 김지성 (한성대학교 사회과학부 공공행정트랙)
  • Received : 2023.05.27
  • Accepted : 2023.06.18
  • Published : 2023.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the modern digitized data society, there is a growing emphasis on securing trustworthiness and fairness in data utilization, along with data openness. By defining the concept of data democracy from various perspectives and presenting elements of normative values, this study aims to provide a basic conceptual framework to identify and evaluate the data governance system and levels of data democracy. As a foundation for the discussion of data democracy, based on Kneuer's (2016) conceptualization of e-democracy, free and equitable access, e-participation, and e-government were introduced as core dimensions of e-democracy. To improve the quality of data governance and foster a better understanding and practical application of the concept of data democracy, this study takes a normative approach from the perspective of democracy. Inclusiveness, equity, participation, and democratic sovereignty are provided as core dimensions of data democracy. This study highlights the significance of data literacy in promoting data democracy. It proposes the creation and assessment of a curriculum rooted in the normative principles of data democracy within the field of library and information science for future investigation.

디지털화가 급속도로 진행되는 현대 데이터 사회에서 데이터 활용에 있어 데이터의 개방성과 더불어 신뢰성 및 공정성 확보 또한 강조되고 있다. 본 연구는 다차원적 관점에서 데이터 민주주의 개념을 정의하고 규범적 가치의 요소를 제시함으로써 데이터 민주주의 체계와 현황을 파악하고 평가할 수 있는 지표 개발과 선정에 필요한 기초 자료를 제공하는 것을 목표로 한다. 우선 데이터 민주주의의 논의를 위한 토대로써 Kneuer(2016)의 개념을 토대로 자유롭고 공평한 접근, e-참여, e-정부를 e-민주주의의 주요 요소로 제시하였다. 이러한 e-민주주의의 규범적 원리를 토대로 데이터 거버넌스의 질 향상을 위해 데이터 민주주의 개념의 이해 및 실제 적용을 위한 데이터 민주주의의 규범적 프레임워크 및 구성요소로 포용성과 형평성, 참여, 민주적 주권을 도출하였다. 본 연구에서는 데이터 민주주의 실천을 위한 데이터 리터러시의 중요성을 강조하고, 문헌정보학에서 데이터 민주주의의 규범적 프레임워크에 근거한 새로운 교육과정 개발 및 평가에 관한 연구를 후속 과제로 제시하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 한성대학교 학술연구비 지원과제임

References

  1. Hwang, Jong Seok (2022. 03. 16.). Politics and Democracy in the Age of Data: The Case of Korea. Digital Times. Available: https://www.dt.co.kr/contents.html?article_no=2022032102109969061001
  2. Hwang, Kyung Tae (2005). Basic concepts of IT governance. Regional Information Society, 32, 106-107.
  3. Jang, Keunjae & Lee, Seungyong (2022). A study on the introduction of data trusts system to expand the rights of privacy self-determination. Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, 28(1), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2022.28.1.029
  4. Jang, Kyoung-Ae & Kim, Woo-Je (2016). Developing and refining components in data governance framework. The Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, 14(9), 93. https://doi.org/10.14801/jkiit.2016.14.9.93
  5. Jeong, Sunkyeong (2022). The study on data governance research trends based on text mining: based on the publication of Korean academic journals from 2009 to 2021. Journal of Digital Convergence, 20(4), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2022.20.4.133
  6. Kim, Hee Kang (2016). Normative Policy Analysis. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
  7. Kim, Seok-Soo (2011). A case study of implementation data governance for enterprise architecture. Journal of Information Technology and Architecture, 8(3), 255-265.
  8. Korea Data Industry Promotion Agency [n.d.]. Introduction to My Data. Available: https://www.kdata.or.kr/kr/contents/mydata_01/view.do
  9. Kwangwoon University Industry-University Cooperation Foundation (2015). A Study on Data Management System Improvement.
  10. Lee, Jae-young (2022. 8. 25.). The True Completion of Autonomy and Decentralization is Data Decentralization. Etnews. Available: https://www.etnews.com/20220825000169
  11. Lee, Wontae (2015. 12. 21.). Let's overcome the information gap in the era of big data with data literacy. KISO Journal. 21. Available: https://journal.kiso.or.kr/?p=7012
  12. Lee, Youngsang, Park, Wonhwan, Shin, Dongsun, & Won, Yoojae (2019). A study on data governance maturity model and total process for the personal data use and protect. Journal of The Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology, 29(5), 1117-1132. https://doi.org/10.13089/JKIISC.2019.29.5.1117
  13. Park, Joo Seok (2019. 08. 23.). Data Democracy and My data. Two E Consulting. Available: https://www.2e.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=208261
  14. Yoo, Sarah (2018). A diagnostic analysis of lis curriculum from the meta-literacy perspective. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(2), 191-220. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2018.52.2.191
  15. Abraham, R., Schneider, J., & Brocke, J. (2019). Data governance: a conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 424-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.008
  16. Anttiroiko, A. V. (2007). Democratic e-governance: basic concepts, issues and future trends. Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 10(1),
  17. Anttiroiko, A. V. (2007). Democratic e-governance: basic concepts, issues and future trends. Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 10(1), 27-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.22896/karis.2007.10.1.003
  18. Barber, B. (1998). Three scenarios for the future of technology and strong democracy. Political Science Quarterly, 113(4), 573-590. https://doi.org/10.2307/2658245
  19. Bastick, Z. (2017). Digital limits of government: the failure of e-democracy. In A. A. Paulin, L. G. Anthopoulos & C. G. Reddick eds. Beyond Bureaucracy: Towards Sustainable Governance Informatisation. Springer International Publishing, 3-14.
  20. Buchstein, H. (1997). Bytes that bite: the internet and deliberative democracy. Constellations, 4(2), 248-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00052
  21. Clift, S. L. (2004). E-Government and Democracy: Representation and Citizen Engagement in the Information Age. The UN UNPAN/DESA for the 2003 World Public Sector Report.
  22. Coleman, S. & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  24. Dahlgreen, P. (2013). The Political Web: Media, Participation and Alternative Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  25. Hague, B. N. & Loader, B. (Eds.). (1999). Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age. London: Routledge.
  26. Hindman, M. (2009). The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  27. Kneuer, M. (2011). Deficits in democractic quality? the effects of party-system institutionalization on the quality of democracy in Central Europe. In G. Erdmann & M. Kneuer eds. Regression of Democracy?. VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften, 133-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93302-3_6
  28. Kneuer, M. (2013). Bereicherung oder stressfaktor? uberlegungen zur wirkung des internets auf die demokratie. In M. Kneuer ed. Das Internet: bereicherung oder stressfaktor fur die demokratie? Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos, 7-33. 재인용: Kneuer, M. (2016). E-democracy: A new challenge for measuring democracy. International Political Science Review, 37(5), 667.
  29. Kneuer, M. (2016). E-democracy: A new challenge for measuring democracy. International Political Science Review, 37(5), 666-678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512116657677
  30. Ladley, J. (2010). Data Governance: How to Design, Deploy, and Sustain an Effective Data Governance Program. MA: Morgan Kaufmann Press.
  31. Lee-Geiller, S. & Lee, T. D. (2019). Using government websites to enhance democratic E-governance: A conceptual model for evaluation. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 208-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.003
  32. Manoharan, A. & Holzer. M. (2012). Preface. In M. Aroon & M. Holzer eds. Active Citizen Participation in E-Government: A Global Perspective. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, xiv-xviii.
  33. McCaughey, M. & Ayers M. D. eds. (2003). Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
  34. Micheli, M., Ponti, M., Craglia, M., & Berti Suman, A. (2020). Emerging models of data governance in the age of datafication. Big Data & Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720948087
  35. OECD. (2003). Promise and Problems of e-Democracy. Challenges of Citizen Engagement. Paris: OECD.
  36. Panian, Z. (2010). Some practical experiences in data governance. World Academy of Science, Engineering Technology, 62, 939-946.
  37. Soares, S. (2010). The IBM Data Governance. Unified Process, MC Press.
  38. Thomas, G. (2006). The DGI Data Governance Framework. Orlando, FL: Data Governance Institute.
  39. Todoran, I. G., Lecornu, L., Khenchaf, A., & Caillec, J. M. L. (2015). A methodology to evaluate important dimensions of information quality in systems. Journal of Data Information Quaterly, 6(2-3), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1145/2744205
  40. UN. (2003). Global e-Government Survey 2003. Available: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/reports/un-e-government-survey-2003
  41. van de Donk, W., Loader, B. D., Nixon, P. G. & Rucht, D. eds. (2004). Cyberprotest. New Media, Citizens, and Social Movements. London, New York, NY: Routledge.
  42. Walsh, L. (2007). Extending e-government and citizen participation in Australia through the Internet. In A. Anttiroiko & M. Malkia eds. Encyclopedia of Digital Government, 812-818.