Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회지)

Korean Library and Information Science Society (한국도서관정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Considerations for Acceptance of LRM Through Analysis of RDA 2020 to Reflect LRM

RDA 2020의 LRM 수용 방식 분석을 통한 LRM 적용시 고려사항에 관한 연구

  • 이미화 (공주대학교 문헌정보교육과 및 학교도서관연구소)
  • Received : 2023.05.27
  • Accepted : 2023.06.12
  • Published : 2023.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, we propose a plan to reflect LRM in various library-related standards or systems through analyzing the reflection of LRM in RDA. To this end, LRM and RDA 2020 were analyzed in terms of entities, relationships, attributes, and encoding schemes. First of all, for the mapping of entities, relationships, and attributes, all properties and relationships were extracted for each entity of RDA, LRM elements corresponding to each property and relationship were found and mapped, and encoding schemes were additionally compared. As a result, the things to consider in the standards and systems to which LRM is to be applied are: first, entities development considering the LRM hierarchy; second, new relation or shortcut path relation development; third, attributes expansion according to the entities considering the LRM hierarchical structure, and fourth, the development of various encoding scheme. Through this study, it will be possible to find an application plan using the application of RDA as a model in standards or systems to accept LRM.

본 연구에서는 RDA의 LRM 수용방식을 분석하여 도서관 관련 다양한 표준 및 시스템에서 LRM 적용시 고려사항을 제안하고자 한다. 이를 위해 LRM과 RDA 2020을 개체, 관계, 속성, 인코딩스킴 측면에서 분석하였다. 우선, 개체, 관계, 속성의 매핑을 위해 RDA의 개체별로 속성과 관계를 모두 추출하여, 각 속성과 관계별로 해당하는 LRM 요소를 찾아 매핑하였고, 추가적으로 인코딩스킴도 함께 비교하였다. 결과적으로 LRM을 적용하려는 표준 및 시스템에서 고려할 사항은 첫째, LRM의 계층구조를 고려한 개체 개발, 둘째, 새로운 관계나 지름길 관계 개발, 셋째, 계층구조를 고려하여 개체에 맞는 속성의 세분화, 넷째, 다양한 인코딩스킴의 개발이다. 본 연구는 LRM을 수용하려는 표준이나 시스템에서 자체적인 LRM 적용방안을 모색하는데 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2021년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 인문사회분야 중견연구자지원사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2021S1A5A2A01062063).

References

  1. Lee, Mihwa (2019a). A study on analyzing the features of 2019 revised RDA. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(3), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.3.201909.97
  2. Lee, Mihwa (2019b). Considerations for BIBFRAME acceptance of expression and representative expression attributes in LRM. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 30(2), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2019.30.2.033
  3. Lee, Mihwa (2020). A study on the BIBFRAME's acceptance of representative expression of RDA toolkit beta. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 51(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.51.202003.1
  4. Lee, Mihwa (2021). A study on considerations in the authority control to accommodate LRM nomen. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(1), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.52.1.202103.109
  5. Lee, Mihwa (2022). LRM's characteristics and applications plan through comparing with FRBR. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 53(2), 355-375. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.53.2.202206.355
  6. Dunsire, G. (2021). Property Chains and Shortcuts in RDA/LRM. Available: https://sites.uw.edu/uwlsemanticweb/2021/12/20/gordon-dunsire-on-property-chains-and-shortcuts-in-rda-lrm/
  7. Glennan, K. (2019a). The New RDA Toolkit: Everything Has Changed or Has It? Available: http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/Glennan%20RDA%20TK%20-%20everything%20has%20changed%20Feb%202019.pdf 
  8. Glennan, K. (2019b). RDA 3R Project: Stabilization Phase. Available: http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/3R%20Stabilization%20Phase%20Glennan%20PCC%20OpCo.pdf
  9. Glennan, K. (2019c). Getting a Handle on the New RDA Toolkit. Available: https://www.rdatoolkit.org/node/184
  10. Glennan, K. (2023, May 18). Interview by author [E-mail]
  11. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (1998). FRBR. Available: https://cdn.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf
  12. IFLA Working Group on Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (2009). Available: https://cdn.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/files/assets/cataloguing/frad/frad_2013.pdf
  13. Joudrey, D. N. & Taylor, A. G. (2018). The Organization of Information (4th ed.). California: Libraries Unlimited.
  14. Oliver, C. (2021). Introducing RDA (2nd ed.). Chicago: ALA.
  15. RDA Steering Committee (2019a). Fictitious and non-human appellations. In RDA Toolkit. Available: https://access.rdatoolkit.org/en-US_topic_cnj_hxj_rgb
  16. RDA Steering Committee (2019b). Manifestation statements. In RDA Toolkit. Available: https://access.rdatoolkit.org/en-US_ala-6f241594-3b46-3eb3-a053-1ecec038fa34
  17. Riva, P., Boeuf, P. L., & Zumer, M. (2017). IFLA Library Reference Model. 이미화 번역 (2020). IFLA 도서관 참조 모형. 서울: 국립중앙도서관. Available: https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr-lrm/ifla-lrm-august-2017_rev 201712-ko.pdf