Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Reconstructive Toolbox

  • Geoffrey G. Hallock (Division of Plastic Surgery, Sacred Heart Campus, St. Luke's Hospital)
  • Received : 2023.02.23
  • Accepted : 2023.04.25
  • Published : 2023.07.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Historically, the approach to any reconstructive challenge, whether intentionally or intuitively, can be seen to follow distinct guidelines that could aptly be called "reconstructive metaphors." These have been intended to inform us as to the "what, "when" and "where" this attempt can best be achieved. Yet the "how" or means to accomplish this goal, usually also intuitively well understood, in a similar vein can now be expressed to be within our "reconstructive toolbox." The latter will distinctly mirror our individuality and contain not only the various hardware that we deem essential, but also the means to access whatever technology we may be comfortable with. No toolbox, even if overflowing will ever be full, as potential options and the diversity they represent surely approaches infinity. But the truly excellent reconstructive surgeon will know when their toolbox is in any way lacking, and fears not remedying that deficiency even if the talents of another colleague must be sought, so as always to ensure that the patient will obtain the best appropriate treatment!

Keywords

References

  1. Lineweaver WC. Problem analysis in reconstructive surgery: up and beyond the reconstructive ladders. In: Wei FC, and Mardini S, eds. Flaps and Reconstructive Surgery. Saunders: Elsevier; 2009:3-6
  2. Gottlieb LJ, Krieger LM. From the reconstructive ladder to the reconstructive elevator. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93(07):1503-1504 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199406000-00027
  3. Mardini S, Wei FC, Salgado CJ, Chen HC. Reconstruction of the reconstructive ladder. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115(07):2174
  4. Mathes SJ, Nahai F. Reconstructive Surgery: Principles, Anatomy & Technique. Vol. 1. New York: Churchill Livingstone; St. Louis: Quality Medical; 1997:10-12
  5. Erba P, Ogawa R, Vyas R, Orgill DP. The reconstructive matrix: a new paradigm in reconstructive plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126(02):492-498 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de232b
  6. Wong CJ, Niranjan N. Reconstructive stages as an alternative to the reconstructive ladder. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121(05):362e-363e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31816b1171
  7. Mohapatra DP, Thiruvoth FM. Reconstruction 2.0: restructuring the reconstructive ladder. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;147(03):572e-573e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007664
  8. Rozen SM. Facial reanimation: basic surgical tools and creation of an effective toolbox for treating patients with facial paralysis. Part A: functional muscle transfers in the long-term facial palsy patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139(02):469-471 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003025
  9. Nahabedian MY, ed. Toolbox for autologous breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2011;38:xiii-xiv
  10. Mormer E. What's in your teaching toolbox? Semin Hear 2018;39(01):107-114 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1613710
  11. Innocenti M. Back to the future: robotic microsurgery. Arch Plast Surg 2022;49(03):287-288 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748020
  12. Kamali P, Dean D, Skoracki R, et al. The current role of three-dimensional printing in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137(03):1045-1055 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000479977.37428.8e
  13. Chang EI, Boukovalas S, Liu J, Largo RD, Hanasono MM, Garvey PB. Reconstruction of posterior mandibulectomy defects in the modern era of virtual planning and three-dimensional modeling. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;144(03):453e-462e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005954
  14. Roh DS, Li EB, Liao EC. CRISPR craft: DNA editing the reconstructive ladder. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;142(05):1355 1364