Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Data Literacy Education in the Library of the Chat GPT, Generative AI Era

ChatGPT, 생성형 AI 시대 도서관의 데이터 리터러시 교육에 대한 연구

  • 이정미 (서울여자대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2023.07.26
  • Accepted : 2023.08.12
  • Published : 2023.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to introduce this language model in the era of generative AI such as ChatGPT, and to provide direction for data literacy education components in libraries using it. To this end, the following three research questions are proposed. First, the technical features of ChatGPT-like language models are examined, and then, it is argued that data literacy education is necessary for the proper and accurate use of information by users using a service platform based on generative AI technology. Finally, for library data literacy education in the ChatGPT era, it is proposed a data literacy education scheme including seven components such as data understanding, data generation, data collection, data verification, data management, data use and sharing, and data ethics. In conclusion, since generative AI technologies such as ChatGPT are expected to have a significant impact on users' information utilization, libraries should think about the advantages, disadvantages, and problems of these technologies first, and use them as a basis for further improving library information services.

본 연구의 목적은 ChatGPT와 같은 생성형 AI 시대를 맞아 이와 같은 언어모델에 대해 소개하고, 이를 활용한 도서관의 데이터 리터러시 교육 구성요소를 고민하고 방향을 제시하고자 하는 연구이다. 이를 위해 다음과 같은 세 가지 연구 문제를 제시하였다. 먼저 ChatGPT 유사 언어모델의 기술적 특징을 살펴보고, 이후 생성형 인공지능 기술 기반 서비스 플랫폼을 활용하여 적합한, 정확한 정보를 유용하게 활용하기 위한 이용자의 데이터 리터러시 역량 교육의 필요성을 주창하였다. 마지막으로 ChatGPT 시대 도서관 데이터 리터러시 교육을 위해 데이터에 대한 이해, 데이터 생성, 데이터 수집, 데이터 검증, 데이터 관리, 데이터 이용 및 공유, 데이터 윤리와 같은 7개 구성항목을 포함한 데이터 리터러시 교육 구성안을 제안하였다. 결론적으로 ChatGPT와 같은 생성형 인공지능 기술이 이용자의 정보 활용에 많은 영향을 미치게 될 것이라 예상되는 만큼 도서관은 이러한 기술의 장단점, 문제점 등에 대해 한발 먼저 고민하고 이를 통해 도서관의 정보서비스를 한층 개선할 수 있는 토대로 삼아야 할 것을 강조하며 마무리했다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2021학년도 서울여자대학교 연구년 수혜 및 2023년 교내연구비의 지원을 받았음(2023-0156).

References

  1. Baek, Bongsam (2023, April 26). The expanding Generative AI market with ChatGPT... increasing emphasis on high-quality data. ZDNet Korea. Available: https://zdnet.co.kr/view/?no=20230426003045 
  2. Choi, Sook-Young (2022). A study on the AI literacy framework. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 25(5), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.32431/kace.2022.25.5.007 
  3. Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Article 70, Section 1, Chapter 4. Available: National Assembly Law Information System. http://likms.assembly.go.kr/law/lawsLawtInqyDetl1010.do 
  4. Gu, Bon Kwon (2023). Essential competence in the era of ChatGPT: 'AI Literacy'. KISO Journal, 50, 36-39. 
  5. Han, Sang Woo (2018). A study about the concept of data literacy based on digital humanities. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 35(4), 223-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.4.223 
  6. Kim, Jihyun (2018). A content analysis of research data management training programs at the University Libraries in North America: focusing on data literacy competencies. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 35(4), 7-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.4.007 
  7. Kim, Seulki & Kim, Taeyoung (2021). A study of the definition and components of data literacy for K-12 education. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 25(5), 691-704.  https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2021.25.5.691
  8. Lee, Jeong-Mee (2013). Understanding big data and utilizing its analysis into library and information services. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 24(4), 53-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.4.053 
  9. Lee, Jeong-Mee (2019). Re-approach to the concept of data literacy and its application to library information services. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 53(1), 159-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.1.159 
  10. Burress, T., Mann, E. Z., Montgomery, S., & Walton, R. (2021). Data literacy in undergraduate education: faculty perspectives and pedagogical approaches. In Bauder, Julia Eds. Teaching Critical Thinking with Numbers: Data Literacy and the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Chicago: Association of College & Research Libraries, 1-22. 
  11. Carmi, E., Yates, S. J., Lockley, E., & Pawluczuk, A. (2020). Data citizenship: rethinking data literacy in the age of disinformation. Internet Policy Review, 9(2), 1-22. 
  12. Condon, P. B., Exline, E., & Buckley, L. A. (2023). Data literacy in the social sciences: findings from a local study on teaching with quantitative data in undergraduate courses. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 18(1), 61-75.  https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30138
  13. Cui, Y., Chen, F., Lutsyk, A., Leighton, J. P., & Cutumisu, M. (2023). Data literacy assessments: a systematic literature review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 30(1), 76-96.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2023.2182737
  14. Dawa, T., Dhendup, S., Tashi, S., & Rosso, M. A. (2020). Technology Literacies and Chat GPT: Perspectives on Emerging Technology Adoption in Academic Writing. 
  15. Firat, M. (2023). What ChatGPT means for universities: perceptions of scholars and students. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 57-63. 
  16. Flierl, M., Quigley, B., Caswell, T., Costello, L., Li, C., Maher, M., ... & Yang, A. (2023). 2023 ACRL Environmental Scan. Available: https://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/whitepapers/Enviro nmentalScan2023.pdf 
  17. Fontichiaro, K. & Johnston, M. P. (2020). Rapid shifts in educators' perceptions of data literacy priorities. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 12(3), 75-87.  https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2020-12-3-7
  18. Kirtania, D. K. & Patra, S. K. (2023). OpenAI ChatGPT generated content and similarity index: a study of selected terms from the Library & Information science (LIS). Qeios. 
  19. Kreinsen, M. & Schulz, S. (2023). Towards the triad of digital literacy, data literacy and AI literacy in teacher education-a discussion in light of the accessibility of Novel Generative AI. Available: https://edarxiv.org/xguzk/ 
  20. Leitgob, H., Prandner, D., & Wolbring, T. (2023). Big data and machine learning in sociology. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1173155. 
  21. Lo, L. S. (2023). The CLEAR path: a framework for enhancing information literacy through prompt engineering. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(4), 102720. 
  22. Lund, B. & Agbaji, D. (2023). Information literacy, data literacy, privacy literacy, and ChatGPT: technology literacies align with perspectives on emerging technology adoption within communities. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4324580 
  23. Pangrazio, L. & Sefton-Green, J. (2020). The social utility of 'data literacy'. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 208-220.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1707223
  24. Pothier, W. G. & Condon, P. B. (2020). Towards data literacy competencies: business students, workforce needs, and the role of the librarian. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 25(3-4), 123-146.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2019.1680189
  25. Ruedinger, D., Cooper, D. M., Minnis, S., & Schaub, G. (2022). Fostering Data Literacy Teaching with Quantitative Data in the Social Sciences. Scholarly Papers and Articles, 75. 
  26. Shiri, A. (2023). ChatGPT and academic integrity. Information Matters. 3(2). 
  27. Tang, Y. & Han, L. (2022, December). A review of domestic and overseas research on data literacy education. In 2022 3rd International Conference on Modern Education and Information Management (ICMEIM 2022). Atlantis Press, 774-780. 
  28. Usova, T. & Laws, R. (2021). Teaching a one-credit course on data literacy and data visualisation. Journal of Information Literacy, 15(1), 84-95.  https://doi.org/10.11645/15.1.2840