한국가정과교육학회지 (Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association)

한국가정과교육학회 (Korea Home Economics Education Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

식생활 라이프 스타일에 따른 편의점도시락 이용 현황과 만족도에 관한 연구: 서울, 경기 및 충청지역 성인을 대상으로

A Study on the Utilization and Satisfaction of Convenience Store Lunchbox by Food-Related Lifestyle: On the Adults in their 20s and older in Seoul, Gyeonggi and Chungcheong Provinces

  • 김현정 (경남대학교 식품영양학과 ) ;
  • 이심열 (동국대학교 서울 가정교육과)
  • Kim, Hyun-Jung (Department of Food and Nutrition, Kyungnam University) ;
  • Lee, Sim-Yeol (Department of Home Economics Education, Dongguk University)
  • 투고 : 2022.12.13
  • 심사 : 2023.02.24
  • 발행 : 2023.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 편의점 도시락을 이용한 경험이 있는 성인 817명을 대상으로 식생활 라이프 스타일에 따른 편의점 도시락 이용현황과 만족도 차이를 분석하였고 편의점 도시락 시장에 효율적인 메뉴 구성과 개선 방향을 제안하는 기초자료를 제공하고자 하였다. 식생활 라이프 스타일 유형을 군집분석한 결과는 미각추구 집단, 경제추구 집단, 편의추구 집단, 건강추구 집단 등의 4가지 집단으로 군집화되었다. 도시락 이용현황을 살펴보면 도시락 제품 구매가격은 3,500~4,000원이었고, 도시락은 주로 점심 식사용으로, 혼자 먹는 것으로 나타났다. 편의점 도시락에 대한 정보를 얻는 곳으로는 편의점 매장, 인터넷 SNS 순이었다(p<0.05). 도시락은 영양성분을 고려하여 구매하였고(p<0.001) 중요한 영양소는 단백질, 열량, 나트륨이라고 하였다. 도시락의 용기는 위생적이고 청결해야 하며 용기 표면에 제품에 대한 정보를 부착하는 것을 중요하게 생각하고 있었다(p<0.01). 4개의 군집 중 경제추구집단은 도시락의 맛(3.66점)과 양(3.60점)에서 가장 만족도가 높았고(p<0.001), 다음은 가격(3.49점), 열량(3.43점)순이었다(p<0.01). 건강추구 집단은 메뉴의 다양성(3.76점)에서 만족도가 높은 반면 편의추구 집단은 메뉴의 다양성(3.47점)에서 만족도가 낮게 나타났고(p<0.05), 모든 집단에서 도시락 구매의 편리성(p<0.001)과 제품브랜드의 신뢰성, 다양한 할인제공도 만족하는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 음식의 영양과 조미료의 첨가 여부는 상대적으로 낮은 만족도를 보였다. 도시락의 밥종류로는 백미밥을 선호하였고(p<0.001) 좋아하는 식재료는 육류인 것으로 나타났다(p<0.01). 모든 집단에서 밥과 찬으로 구성된 도시락을 좋아하였고 저염식과 고단백식을 지향하였으나 유의적인 차이는 없었다. 앞으로도 편의점 도시락은 계속 이용할 것이며(p<0.01), 주변인에게 구매의 편리함과, 저렴한 가격, 신선한 재료, 풍부한 영양 등으로 도시락 이용을 추천하겠다고 하였다. 본 연구의 조사결과 모든 집단에서 가장 중요한 요인은 맛으로 나타났으며, 편리성에서 가장 높은 만족도를 보였지만 음식의 영양과 조미료의 첨가 여부는 상대적으로 낮은 만족도를 나타냈다. 따라서 편의점 도시락 시장이 성장하기 위해서는 도시락의 품질개선과 다양한 메뉴 개발 등이 이루어져야 할 것으로 보인다.

This study investigated the utilization and satisfaction of lunchboxes according to food-related lifestyle. A sample of 819 adults who regularly purchased lunchboxes were studied. This study can provide basic data for effective menu development. The participants of the study were classified into 4 groups: a 'taste-seeking group', an 'economy-seeking group', 'a convenience-seeking group', and a 'health-seeking group'. The purchase price of lunchboxes was in the range of 3,500 to 4,000 won. The 'health-seeking group' was shown to spend the highest amount on lunchboxes, over 5,100 won. Information about lunchboxes was obtained primarily through convenience stores followed by Internet SNS (p<0.05). Most participants considered nutritional value when purchasing a lunchbox (p<0.001), of which protein, caloric, and sodium content were perceived as important. Moreover, lunchboxes with clean and hygienic aesthetics were preferred amongst the 'health-seeking group' (p<0.01). The 'economy-seeking group' had a higher satisfaction linked with taste (3.66) and quantity (3.60, p<0.001). Furthermore, in terms of the satisfaction with a menu variety the 'health-seeking group' showed the highest satisfaction with a score of 3.76, while the 'convenience-seeking group' ranked the lowest satisfaction with a score of 3.46 (p<0.05). All groups were satisfied with the convenience for purchasing lunchbox (p<0.001). Additionally, most participants preferred white rice (p<0.001) and meat (p<0.01) with cooked by fried and grilled. Lastly, in the content of the lunchbox use in the future, most participants indicated the intent for continuous use (p<0.01) and recommendation to others with the reason for the low price (19.2%) in the 'economy-seeking group', fresh ingredients (16.2%) in the 'convenience-seeking group', and nutritive (17.3%) in the 'health-seeking group', as well as for the convenience of purchase in the overall groups. Taken together, 'taste' and 'convenience' were the most important factors for all groups, while 'nutrition of food' and 'addition of condiments' scored relatively low on the satisfaction in all groups. Therefore, we recommend for the growth of the convenience store lunchbox market, that it is necessary to improve the quality of the lunchbox by developing various menus based on lifestyle group and fortifying nutrition.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bae, J. W. (2020, September 18). Convenience store lunchboxes rather than meal from the restaurant. https://n.news.naver.com/article/025/003036399
  2. Beak, S. H., & Kim, Y. S. (2017). Effect of consumption values on attitude and behavioral intentions toward a premium lunch box at a convenience store. Journal of Food And Nutrition, 30(2), 326-335.
  3. Bok, M.-J., & Hong, E.-S. (2022). Study on consumer confidence, satisfaction, and repurchase intention on convenience store lunch boxes by food-related lifestyle type. Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, 27(3), 157-164.
  4. Choi, J. I. (2017). A study on the selection attributes and purchase behaviors of CVS dosirak in accordance with personal value. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  5. Choi, T. H., Lee, M. C., & Kim, D. S. (2020). The effect of selection attributes of meal-kit home replacement food (HMR) on satisfaction and repurchase intention. Culinary Science & Hospitality Research, 26(5), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2020.26.5.012
  6. Choi Y. J. (2018). The effect of 20, 30's consumers' food related lifestyle(FRL) and convenience store PB food selection attribute on convenience store PB food satisfaction. Unpublished master's thesis. Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  7. Grunert, K. G. (2006). Future trends and consumer lifestyles with regard to meat consumption. Meat Science, 74(1), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.04.016
  8. Han, J.-H., & Kim D.-G. (2019). The effect of selection attributes of HMR convenience Store dosirak and chain dosirak on relationship orientation. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 31(3), 259-276. https://doi.org/10.31336/jtlr.2019.3.31.3.259
  9. Hong, M.-S., Kang H.-S., Myeong S.-H., & Yoon D.-I. (2017). The effect of customer's selection attributes of convenience store box lunch on positive consumption emotion and customer loyalty. Food Service Industry Journal, 13(2), 29-44.
  10. Hwang, J.-S., Park, G.-C., Yoon, Y.-J., & Kim, H.-J. (2018). A study on the management strategy using product attributes in the home meal replacement market. Korean Journal of Hotel Administration, 27(8), 327-338. https://doi.org/10.24992/kjht.2018.12.27.08.32
  11. Hwang, Y.-J., & Lee, S.-B. (2016). The effects of brand image, quality level, and perceived value on brand credibility and purchase intention: A comparative study between PB lunch boxes from convenience stores and brand lunch boxes. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 30(11), 199-217. https://doi.org/10.21298/ijthr.2016.11.30.11.19
  12. Jeon, J.-A. (2022). A study on the dietary lifestyle of delivery app users due to COVID-19. Journal of Hotel & Reseort, 21(3), 301-336.
  13. Jeong, J. (2018). Comparing with students' satisfaction on convenience food according to food-related lifestyle in Incheon area. The Korea Academic Society of Tourism and Leisure, 30(9), 141-156.
  14. Korea Agro-Fisheries and Food Corporation (2019). 2019 Processed food segmentation market status- HMR. Naju: Author
  15. Korea Agro-Fisheries and Food Corporation (2020). 2020 Food industry market and consumer trend analysis. Naju: Author.
  16. Korea Rural Economic Institute (2020). 2020 Consumer behavior for meat consumption and tasks to respond to its changes. Naju: Author.
  17. Korea Rural Economic Institute (2021). 2021 processed food consumer attitude survey. Naju: Author.
  18. Kim, H. C., & Kim, M. R. (2015). Intake behavior regarding beverages according to dietary lifestyles of university students. Journal of the East Asian Society of Dietary Life, 25(2), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2015.4.25.2.223
  19. Kim, H.-I., & Lee, S.-H. (2016). Undergraduate students' perception and satisfaction on convenience food according to food-related lifestyle. Korean Journal of Hospitality & Tourism, 25(7), 85-96.
  20. Kim, H.-J., & Huh, J. (2013). SPSS 21.0 Statistical analysis commentary. Seoul: Topbooks.
  21. Kim, H.-J., & Lee, S.-Y. (2017). A study on food purchasing behavior through internet shopping according to food-related lifestyles of housewives. Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 26(6), 597-608. https://doi.org/10.5934/kjhe.2017.26.6.597
  22. Kim, H. S., Huh, I.-J., & Lee, S.-Y. (2020). A study on the utilization and satisfaction of commercially available lunchbox by dietary lifestyle. Korean Journal of Community Nutrition, 25(4), 267-279. https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2020.25.4.267
  23. Kim, I.-H., & Bae, G.-K. (2017). Menu selection attributes of convenience store lunch box according tofood lifestyle through IPA analysis: Focused on college students in Busan. Journal of Foodservice Management Society of Korea, 20(2), 33-52.
  24. Kim J.-H., Kim Y.-S., & Jeon Y.-J. (2017). The effects of the convenience store lunch-box selection attributes on satisfaction and behavioral intentions. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 29(7), 353-370.
  25. Kim, J. E., & Lee, E. J. (2018). A study on the factors of purchasing by lifestyle of university students: The convenience store HMR. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 32(12), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.5934/kjhe.2017.26.6.597
  26. Kim, J. S., Hong, G. N., Park, N. H., & Chun, T. Y. (2019). The effects of home meal replacement(HMR) selection attributes on consumer satisfaction and trust in the context of eating lifestyle. Journal of Distribution and Management Research, 22(2), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.17961/jdmr.22.2.201904.71
  27. Kim, J. S., & Kim, H. Y. (2020). Eating and eating out behaviors based on food-related life style. Culinary Science & Hospitality Research, 26(18), 63-76.
  28. Kim, K. H. (2019). The effect of take-out food selective attribution of Korean restaurant according to food-related lifestyles on repurchase intention-the mediating effect of trust and customer satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Daegu Catholic University, Daegu, Korea.
  29. Kim, S. O. (2018). The effects of selection attribute on the satisfaction and purchase intention of PB lunch box at convenience store. Unpublished master's thesis, Kyonggi University, Kyonggi-do, Korea.
  30. Kim, Y.-M. (2020). The effect of extrinsic cues of convenience store lunch PB products on trust and purchase intention. Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 34(1), 129-141. https://doi.org/10.21298/ijter.2020.1.34.1.1
  31. Ko, J-Y., Hong, S-S., & Yoo, E. Y.(2013). The study of relation between life style of Ddining-out consumers and menu selection attributes in Korean restaurants. The Korea Academic Society of Tourism and Leisure, 2(73), 155-175.
  32. Lazer, W. (1963). Life style concepts and marketing. Toward Scientific Marketing, 15(4), 130-139.
  33. Lee, D.-Y., & Kim, S.-I. (2020). Study on visual factors affecting purchase of convenient store's packed-meal on mobile application. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(11), 443-448. https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2020.18.11.443
  34. Lee, D.-J., Kim, G.-Y., & Kim, Y.-S. (2019). The effect of the choice attributes of the convenience store lunch box on the consumer evaluation, satisfaction and repurchase intent. Culinary Science &, Hospitality Research, 25(6), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2019.25.6.013
  35. Lee, H.-Y., Chung, L., & Yang, I. (2005). Conceptualizing and prospecting for home meal replacement in Korea by delphi technique. Journal of Nutrition and Health, 38(3), 251-258.
  36. Lee, J. A. (2017). The effect of choice attribute of convenience store lunchbox on purchase intention according to consumption value. Unpublished master's thesis, Kyonggi University, Kyonggi-do, Korea.
  37. Lee, J. S., Moon, M.-S., & Lim, S. Y.(2020). Eating behavior and convenience store food consumption behavior of millennial male single-Pperson household based on food-related lifestyle. The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition, 49(4), 394-404. https://doi.org/0.3746/jkfn.2020.49.4.394 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2020.49.4.394
  38. Lee, K.-J., & Lee, S.-Y. (2021). A study on the utilization and satisfaction of meal-kits by food-related lifestyle. Journal of Home Economics Education Reserarch, 33(4), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2021.12.33.4.15
  39. Lee, S. A. (2018). The influence of select attribute of convenience store meal box on perceived benefit, perceived risk, brand value, and recommend intention: application of the means-end chain theory and APT laddering method. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kyungsung University, Pusan, Korea.
  40. Lee, S. M., & Kim, M.-H. (2020). Association between breakfast and lifestyle, interest in beauty care, and attitude toward breakfast in high school girls in Incheon. Journal of Nutrition and Health, 53(3), 288-302. https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2020.53.3.288
  41. National Nutrition Management (2022). National nutrition management Act. Seoul: Author.
  42. Oh, J. E., & Yoon, H.-R. (2017). A study on dietary behavior of chinese consumers segmented by dietary lifestyle. Journal of the Koran Society of Food Culture, 32(5), 383-393. https://doi.org/10.7318/kjfc/2017.32.5.383
  43. Seo, Y. T., & Kim, H. J. (2021). A study on the selection of HMR food types by dietary lifestyle. Journal of Tourism Management Reseach, 25(3), 191-209. https://doi.org/10.18604/tmro.2021.25.3.10
  44. Yang, S. H. (2018). The celebrity marketing effect of college students' convenience store lunchbox use. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 32(1), 155-167. https://doi.org/10.21298/ijthr2018.11.32.11