DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Net Promoter Score with Friends and Family Test applied to arthroscopic shoulder surgery

  • Jabbal Monu (Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh) ;
  • Sharma Sunil (NHS Fife, Victoria Hospital Kirkcaldy)
  • Received : 2022.07.06
  • Accepted : 2022.11.14
  • Published : 2023.03.01

Abstract

Background: The Friends and Family Test (FFT) developed by the UK National Health Service evaluates whether patients are satisfied with a service provided, where improvements are needed, and how likely patients are to recommend the intervention. Calculated from the FFT, the Net Promoter Score (NPS) creates a recommendation metric for treatment. The primary aim of this prospective study is to evaluate NPS for arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) and rotator cuff repair (RCR). Secondary aims are to postoperatively evaluate 1-year changes in patients' Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSSs) in terms of the proportion of patients satisfied with their surgery and correlation with FFT. Methods: During a 2-year period, all patients undergoing ASD or RCR completed questionnaires prospectively. Collected preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 year. Results: NPSs were 31 for ASD (n=32) and 52 for RCR (n=39). OSSs increased by 4.3 and 6.9 for ASD and RCR, respectively (P<0.001). Overall, 75% of ASD and 77% of RCR patients were either "satisfied" or "very satisfied," respectively, with procedure outcomes. Scores from FFT had a positive correlation with improvement in OSS and satisfaction scores among patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgeries (P<0.001). Conclusions: The current study shows positive NPS outcomes in patients with ASD and RCR. Scores from FFT correlate well with both satisfaction and OSS among patients. NPS can be an adjunct to traditional patient-reported outcome measures to provide global evaluation of patient experiences to aid in determining the clinical value of common procedures in shoulder orthopaedics. Level of evidence: III.

Keywords

References

  1. Andren L, Lundberg BJ. Treatment of rigid shoulders by joint distension during arthrography. Acta Orthop Scand 1965;36:45-53.  https://doi.org/10.3109/17453676508989370
  2. Iqbal S, Jacobs U, Akhtar A, Macfarlane RJ, Waseem M. A history of shoulder surgery. Open Orthop J 2013;7:305-9.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010305
  3. Jones T, Carr AJ, Beard D, et al. Longitudinal study of use and cost of subacromial decompression surgery: the need for effective evaluation of surgical procedures to prevent overtreatment and wasted resources. BMJ Open 2019;9:e030229. 
  4. Beard D, Rees J, Rombach I, et al. The CSAW Study (Can Shoulder Arthroscopy Work?)--a placebo-controlled surgical intervention trial assessing the clinical and cost effectiveness of arthroscopic subacromial decompression for shoulder pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2015;16:210. 
  5. Paavola M, Malmivaara A, Taimela S, et al. Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial. BMJ 2018;362:k2860. 
  6. NHS England. Evidence-based interventions: consultation document. NHS England; 2018. 
  7. NHS England. Friends and Family Test collection overview: August 2021 [Internet]. NHS England; 2021 [cited 2022 Nov 14]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/friends-and-family-test-data-august-2021/ 
  8. Hamilton DF, Lane JV, Gaston P, et al. Assessing treatment outcomes using a single question: the net promoter score. Bone Joint J 2014;96:622-8.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B5.32434
  9. Reichheld F. The microeconomics of customer relationships. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 2006;47:73-8. 
  10. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:593-600.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.78B4.0780593
  11. Stirling P, Jenkins PJ, Clement ND, Duckworth AD, McEachan JE. The Net Promoter Scores with Friends and Family Test after four hand surgery procedures. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2019;44:290-5.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193418819686
  12. Williams GN, Gangel TJ, Arciero RA, Uhorchak JM, Taylor DC. Comparison of the single assessment numeric evaluation method and two shoulder rating scales: outcomes measures after shoulder surgery. Am J Sports Med 1999;27:214-21.  https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465990270021701
  13. Thigpen CA, Shanley E, Momaya AM, et al. Validity and responsiveness of the single alpha-numeric evaluation for shoulder patients. Am J Sports Med 2018;46:3480-5.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518807924
  14. Procedures of lower clinical value (PLCV)-Policy Harmonisation presentation to health and adult social care scrutiny. What are procedures of lower clinical value (PLCV)? 2016. 
  15. Procedures of Lower Clinical Value (PLCV) engagement report on the behalf of Birmingham CrossCity, Birmingham South Central and Solihull Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs). 2016. 
  16. Public Affairs. Procedures of Limited clinical value: Royal College of Surgeons Briefing. RCSENG - Communications; 2011. 
  17. Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open 2013;3:e001570.