DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중량식 라이시미터에서 동계 작물(청보리) 재배에 따른 밭토양 양분수지

Nutrient Balance during Crop (Forage Barley) Cultivation in Winter Season: A Weighing Lysimeter Study

  • 안진희 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농업환경부 토양비료과) ;
  • 이찬욱 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농업환경부 토양비료과) ;
  • 옥정훈 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농업환경부 토양비료과) ;
  • 박혜진 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농업환경부 토양비료과) ;
  • 송요성 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농업환경부 토양비료과) ;
  • 이예진 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농업환경부 토양비료과)
  • Jin-Hee An (Soil and Fertilizer Management Division, Department of Agricultural Environment, National Institute of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Chan-Wook Lee (Soil and Fertilizer Management Division, Department of Agricultural Environment, National Institute of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Jung-Hun Ok (Soil and Fertilizer Management Division, Department of Agricultural Environment, National Institute of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Hye-Jin Park (Soil and Fertilizer Management Division, Department of Agricultural Environment, National Institute of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Yo-Sung Song (Soil and Fertilizer Management Division, Department of Agricultural Environment, National Institute of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Ye-Jin Lee (Soil and Fertilizer Management Division, Department of Agricultural Environment, National Institute of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • 투고 : 2023.08.09
  • 심사 : 2023.08.31
  • 발행 : 2023.09.30

초록

중량식 라이시미터를 이용하여 사양질과 식질 토양에서 동계 작물인 청보리 재배 여부에 따른 양분 유출과 양분 수지를 평가하였다. 양분 유출과 관련된 지하 배수량은 식질에서 가장 많았으며, 동계 작물 재배 여부에 따른 토양 수분함량을 비교해보면 나지에서는 사양질과 식질 토양 모두 30-40%를 유지하였고, 청보리 재배구는 생육 재생기인 3-4월에 평균 증발산량이 평균 2.1-6.7 mm·day-1이었으며, 토양 수분함량은 18.1-21.8%까지 낮아졌다. 동계작물 재배 시 봄철 생육재생기에 생체량이 증가함에 따라 증발산량도 증가하기 때문에 수분이 지상부로 이동하므로 양분의 지하유출을 예방할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다. 또한 사양질 토양에서 청보리의 재배에 따른 양분수지는 비료 공급량에 비해 작물 흡수량이 많아 음의 값을 나타냈으며, 토양에 집적된 양분을 이용했을 것으로 추측된다. 따라서 동계에 적정량의 비료를 주고 사료작물을 재배하면 경지 이용률을 높이고, 양분수지를 낮추는데 도움이 될 것으로 판단된다.

Nutrient balance is an environmental indicator for assessing the potential of sustainable agriculture. Improving the use of arable land is crucial for reducing the nutrient balance. This study monitored soil water content, seepage water, crop growth, and nutrient balance in weighing lysimeters during forage barley (Hordeum vulgare L., "Yeongyang") cultivation from October to April. The study was conducted from 2020 to 2022, and the treatments included forage barley cultivation (clay loam, CL-FC; sandy loam, SL-FC) and bare soils. During the regeneration period (March to April), the soil moisture contents of bare and forage barley-cultivated soils were approximately 30-40% and 18.1-21.8%, respectively. The daily evapotranspiration of forage barley was 6.09 mm. The nitrogen balances for SL-FC and CL-FC were -0.43 to -2.93 g m-2 and -0.79 to 0.75 g m-2, respectively, which can be attributed to the higher nutrient uptake of forage barley in SL-FC than in CL-FC. Consequently, the forage barley cultivation in SL-FC can potentially reduce nutrient leaching during the spring rainy season. Furthermore, nutrient balance can be reduced by cultivating forage crops during the winter season.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ01722104) and 2023 the Rural Development Administration Fellowship Program of National Institute of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

참고문헌

  1. Kremer AM (2013) Methodology and Handbook Eurostat/OECD-Nutrient Budgets, pp. 18-64, European Commission Eurostat, Luxembourg.
  2. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, Rome, 300(9), D05109.
  3. Yang HY, Kim JG, Oh BW, Seo IH (2020) Improvement of nutrient balance using feed crops for regional nutrient management. Journal of Bio-Environment Control, 29(1), 89-95. https://doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2020.29.1.89.
  4. Ryu JH, Lee KS, Chung DY (2008) Review of management methods and criteria for environmentally-sound soil. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science, 35(1), 53-67.
  5. Park HS, Hwang KJ, Park NG, Choi GJ, Lee JK, Cheon DW, Ko MS (2008) Comparison of forage production and feed value of winter forage crops in Jeju. Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science, 28(3), 215-220. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2008.28.3.215
  6. Cho WM, Cho YM, Hong SK, Jeong ES, Lee JM, Yoon SK (2000) Effects of feeding whole crop barley silage on growth performance, feed efficiency and meat quality in hanwoo steers. Korean Journal of Animal Science, 42(2), 181-188.
  7. Kung KJ, Steenhuis TS, Kladivko EJ, Gish TJ, Bubenzer G, Helling CS (2000) Impact of preferential flow on the transport of adsorbing and non-adsorbing tracers. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64(4), 1290-1296. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.6441290x.
  8. Shipitalo MJ, Gibbs F (2000) Potential of earthworm burrows to transmit injected animal wastes to tile drains. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64(6), 2103-2109. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.6462103x.
  9. Akay O, Fox GA (2007) Experimental investigation of direct connectivity between macro pores and subsurface drains during infiltration. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 71(5), 1600-1606. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0359.
  10. Oberholzer S, Prasuhn V, Hund A (2017) Crop water use under Swiss pedoclimatic conditions-Evaluation of lysimeter data covering a seven-year period. Field Crops Research, 211, 48-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.06.003.
  11. Meisinger JJ, Ricigliano KA (2017) Nitrate leaching from winter cereal cover crops using undisturbed soil-column lysimeters. Journal of Environmental Quality, 46(3), 576-584. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2016.09.0372.
  12. Lee YJ, Han KH, Lee SB, Sung JK, Song YS, Lee DB (2017) Nutrient leaching and crop uptake in weighing lysimeter planted with soybean as affected by water management. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 36(3), 147-153. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2017.36.3.30.
  13. Lee YJ, Ok JH, Lee SB, Sung JK, Song YS, Lee DB (2018) Nitrogen leaching and balance of soils grown with cabbage in weighing lysimeter. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 37(4), 166-171. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2018.37.3.23.
  14. Lee SI, Ok JH, Son JW, Hwang SA, Oh BY, Hur SO (2022) Changes of soil physico-chemical properties by soil loss of bare condition using slope lysimeter. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 55(4), 402-412. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2022.55.4.402.
  15. Klammler G, Fank J (2014) Determining water and nitrogen balances for beneficial management practices using lysimeters at Wagna test site (Austria). Science of the Total Environmental, 499, 448-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.009.
  16. Baligar VC, Fageria NK, He ZL (2001) Nutrient use efficiency in plants. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 32(7-8), 921-950. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-100104098.
  17. Park ME (1995) The effect of soil moisture stress on growth of barley and grain quality. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 28(2), 165-175.
  18. Durner W (1994) Hydraulic conductivity estimation for soils with heterogeneous pore structure. Water Resources Research, 30(2), 211-223. https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR02676.
  19. Ritchie JT (1981) Soil water availability. Plant and Soil, 58(1/3), 327-338. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02180061
  20. Beven, K, Germann P (1982) Macropores and water flow in soils. Water Resources Research, 18, 1311-1325. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR018i005p01311.
  21. Nguyen HT, Park J, Ann T, Lee J, Myoung D, Cho Y, Son J (2010) Analysis of relationship among growth, environmental factors and transpiration in soilless culture of paprika plants. Korean Journal of Horticultural Science & Technology, 28(1), 59-64.
  22. Jurecka F, Fischer M, Hlavinka P, Balek J, Semeradova D, Blahova M, Anderson MC, Hain C, Zalud Z, Trnka M (2021) Potential of water balance and remote sensing-based evapotranspiration models to predict yields of spring barley and winter wheat in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Water Management, 256, 107064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107064.
  23. Kim JS, Kim DH, Jung KY, Lee SH, Chun HC, Kwon SH, Seo JD, Kim JH (2016) Analyzing evapotranspiration of soybean at different groundwater levels using mini lysimeters. Korea Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer Conference, 69.
  24. Gaines TP, Gaines ST (1994) Soil texture effect on nitrate leaching in soil percolates. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 25(13-14), 2561-2570. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629409369207.
  25. Kamprath, EJ (1987) Enhanced phosphorus status of maize resulting from nitrogen fertilization of high phosphorus soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 51(6), 1522-1526. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100060021x.
  26. Woods RR, Cameron KC, Edwards GR, Di HJ, Clough TJ (2016) Effects of forage type and gibberellic acid on nitrate leaching losses. Soil Use and Management, 32(4), 565-572. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12297.