DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Participation Intentions in Environmental Initiatives within Restaurant Social Media Communities: Exploring the Influence of Reward Types and the Moderating Effect of Social Media Participation Level

레스토랑 소셜미디어커뮤니티에서의 친환경이니셔티브 참여의도: 보상유형의 영향과 소셜미디어 참여수준의 조절효과

  • Jang, Yoon Jung (Sol International Restaurant & Entrepreneurship, Hotel, Restaurant & Culinary Arts School, Woosong University)
  • 장윤정 (우송대학교 호텔외식조리대학 글로벌외식창업전공)
  • Received : 2023.08.16
  • Accepted : 2023.08.28
  • Published : 2023.08.31

Abstract

The objective of this study was to explore how different types of rewards affect customers' inclinations to engage in environmental activities promoted through restaurant social media platforms. In addition, we investigated the potential moderating role of customer level of participation within the social media community. A total of 202 valid responses obtained by distributing a self-administered survey among restaurant patrons were subjected to hierarchical regression analysis to examine relationships between variables. The findings underscored the significant influence of economic and social rewards on shaping customer intent to participate in environmental initiatives promoted within restaurant social media communities. Furthermore, the study revealed that the extent of customer participation within the social media community moderated the relationship between rewards and their likelihood to partake in environmentally conscious behaviors. These results have meaningful implications for restaurant managers seeking to promote environmental initiatives effectively through social media platforms and within their establishments.

Keywords

References

  1. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 16:74-94  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  2. Barclay P. 2006. Reputational benefits for altruistic punishment. Evol. Hum. Behav., 27(5):325-344  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.01.003
  3. Berry LL. 1995. Relationship marketing of services: growing interest, emerging perspectives. J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 23(4):236-245  https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300402
  4. Choi J, Seo S. 2017. Goodwill intended for whom? Examining factors influencing conspicuous prosocial behavior on social media. Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 60:23-32  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.09.014
  5. Dewald B, Bruin BJ, Jang YJ. 2014. US consumer attitudes towards "green" restaurants. Anatolia, 25(2):171-180  https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2013.839457
  6. Hajli N, Shanmugam M, Papagiannidis S, Zahay D, Richard MO. 2017. Branding co-creation with members of online brand communities. J. Bus. Res., 70:136-144  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.026
  7. Jang YJ. 2022a. The role of stakeholder engagement in environmental sustainability: A moderation analysis of chain affiliation. J. Hosp. Tour. Res., 46(5):1006-1026  https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348020936348
  8. Jang YJ. 2022b. Understanding Restaurant Customers' Environmental Behaviorin the Social Media Context: An Application of Theory of Planned Behavior, Glob. Bus. Finance Rev., 27(2):68-80  https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2022.27.2.48
  9. Jang YJ, Kim E. 2022. How self-identity and social identity grow environmentally sustainable restaurants' brand communities via social rewards, J. Hosp. Tour. Res., pp 1-17 
  10. Jang YJ, Kim WG, Bonn MA. 2011. Generation Y consumers' selection attributes and behavioral intentions concerning green restaurants. Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 30(4):803-811  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.12.012
  11. Jang YJ, Kim WG, Lee HY. 2015. Coffee shop consumers' emotional attachment and loyalty to green stores: The moderating role of green consciousness. Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 44:146-156  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.10.001
  12. Jang YJ, Zheng T. 2020. Assessment of the environmental sustainability of restaurants in the U.S.: The effects of restaurant characteristics on environmental sustainability performance. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res., 23(2):133-148  https://doi.org/10.1080/15378020.2019.1691416
  13. Jang YJ, Zheng T, Bosselman RH. 2017. Top managers' environmental values, leadership, and stakeholder engagement in promoting environmental sustainability in the restaurant industry. Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 63:101-111  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.03.005
  14. Laroche M, Bergeron J, Barbaro-Forleo G. 2001. Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. J. Consum. Mark., 18(6):503-520  https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006155
  15. Lee JS, Tsang N, Pan S. 2015. Examining the differential effects of social and economic rewards in a hotel loyalty program. Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 49:17-27  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.05.003
  16. Mazhenova S, Choi J, Chung J. 2016. International tourists' awareness and attitude about environmental responsibility and sustainable practices. Glob. Bus. Finance Rev., 21(2):132-146  https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2016.21.2.132
  17. Melancon J, Noble S, Noble C. 2011. Managing rewards to enhance relational worth. J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 39:341-362 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0206-5
  18. Muniz AM, O'guinn TC. 2001. Brand community. J. Consum. Res., 27(4):412-432  https://doi.org/10.1086/319618
  19. Noble SM, Esmark CL, Noble CH. 2014. Accumulation versus instant loyalty programs: the influence of controlling policies on customers' commitments. J. Bus. Res., 67(3):361-368  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.01.002
  20. Nunnally JC. 1978. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York. 
  21. Peterson RA. 1995. Relationship marketing and the consumer. J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 23(4):278-281  https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300407
  22. Rosenbaum M, Ostrom A, Kuntze R. 2005. Loyalty programs and a sense of community. J. Serv. Mark., 19(4):222-233  https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040510605253
  23. Rummel A. Feinberg R. 1988. Cognitive evaluation theory: a meta-analytic review of the literature. Soc. Behav. Pers., 16(2):147-164  https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1988.16.2.147
  24. Ryan RM, Deci EL. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol., 25:54-67  https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  25. Shin J, Mattila AS. 2019. In search of diners responsive to health cues: Insights from US consumers. Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 82:260-269  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.10.008
  26. Sigala M. 2014. Customer involvement in sustainable supply chain management: A research framework and implications in tourism. Cornell Hosp., Q. 55(1):76-88  https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965513504030
  27. Trudel R. 2018. Sustainable consumer behavior. Consum. Psychol. Rev., 2:85-96  https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1045
  28. Tussyadiah SP, Kausar DR, Soesilo PK. 2018. The effect of engagement in online social network on susceptibility to influence. J. Hosp. Tour. Res., 42(2):201-223  https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348015584441
  29. Van Kenhove P, De Wulf K, Steenhaut S. 2003. The relationship between unethical behavior and customer loyalty in a retail environment. J. Bus. Ethics., 44(4):261-278  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023678507088
  30. Veblen T. 1899. The theory of the leisure class. New York, NY: Penguin., pp 205-370 
  31. Zhang L, Yang W, Zheng X. 2018. Corporate social responsibility: The effect of need-for-status and fluency on consumers' attitudes. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp., 30:1492-1507  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-01-2017-0048