DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Importance of Relative Comparison of Capsular Widths on the Affected and Non-Affected Sides of Temporomandibular Joint Arthralgia Patients: An Ultrasonography Study

  • Hee-Won Kim (Department of Oral Medicine, Pusan National University Dental Hospital, Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Yong-Woo Ahn (Department of Oral Medicine, Pusan National University Dental Hospital, Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Sung-Hee Jeong (Department of Oral Medicine, Pusan National University Dental Hospital, Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Soo-Min Ok (Department of Oral Medicine, Pusan National University Dental Hospital, Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Hye-Mi Jeon (Dental Clinic Center, Pusan National University Hospital) ;
  • Hye-Min Ju (Department of Oral Medicine, Pusan National University Dental Hospital, Dental Research Institute)
  • Received : 2023.08.28
  • Accepted : 2023.09.10
  • Published : 2023.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, we evaluate the potential of the relative ratio of capsular width (RCW) between the affected side (Aff) and non-affected side (Non-aff) in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthralgia. We assessed whether RCW may hold greater diagnostic significance than the objective capsular width (CW) reported in previous studies when diagnosing arthralgia using ultrasonography (US). Methods: Forty-nine patients were assessed using US, excluding four patients with bilateral arthralgia. The patients were divided into two groups: 40 with unilateral arthralgia (UA), and nine without arthralgia (NA). We measured CW and masseter muscle thickness using US. Moreover, we employed RCW to analyze the variances between the groups. The numerical rating scale (NRS) and RCW were compared before and after dexamethasone injection in 10 patients who underwent follow-up evaluations. Results: Within the UA group, CW on the Aff was found to be significantly larger compared to the Non-aff (p<0.001). Additionally, RCW in the UA group was greater than that in the NA group (p<0.01). Furthermore, after dexamethasone injection, a reduction in the NRS and RCW values was observed in the 10 patients who were followed up. Conclusions: While previous studies have suggested a link between arthralgia and TMJ effusion, making CW a possible indirect diagnostic indicator for arthralgia, our findings propose that RCW could hold more diagnostic value than objective CW. However, additional studies are required to standardize the protocols for interpreting US results and determining the cutoff value of RCW in diagnosing TMJ arthralgia.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Pusan National University Research Grant, 2022.

References

  1. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014;28:6-27. https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.1151
  2. Tsuga K, Akagawa Y, Sakaguchi R, Tsuru H. A short-term evaluation of the effectiveness of stabilization-type occlusal splint therapy for specific symptoms of temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:610-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90286-2
  3. Bouloux GF. Temporomandibular joint pain and synovial fluid analysis: a review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:2497-2504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.103
  4. Bas B, Yilmaz N, Gokce E, Akan H. Ultrasound assessment of increased capsular width in temporomandibular joint internal derangements: relationship with joint pain and magnetic resonance grading of joint effusion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;112:112-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.02.020
  5. Manfredini D, Tognini F, Zampa V, Bosco M. Predictive value of clinical findings for temporomandibular joint effusion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:521-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00475-X
  6. Yano K, Sano T, Okano T. A longitudinal study of magnetic resonance (MR) evidence of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) fluid in patients with TMJ disorders. Cranio 2004;22:64-71. https://doi.org/10.1179/crn.2004.008
  7. Kim JH, Park JH, Kim JW, Kim SJ. Can ultrasonography be used to assess capsular distention in the painful temporomandibular joint? BMC Oral Health 2021;21:497.
  8. Manfredini D, Tognini F, Melchiorre D, Zampa V, Bosco M. Ultrasound assessment of increased capsular width as a predictor of temporomandibular joint effusion. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:359-364. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/25091144
  9. Talmaceanu D, Lenghel LM, Csutak C, et al. Diagnostic value of high-resolution ultrasound for the evaluation of capsular width in temporomandibular joint effusion. Life (Basel) 2022;12:477.
  10. Talmaceanu D, Lenghel LM, Bolog N, et al. Imaging modalities for temporomandibular joint disorders: an update. Clujul Med 2018;91:280-287. https://doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-970
  11. Assaf AT, Kahl-Nieke B, Feddersen J, Habermann CR. Is high-resolution ultrasonography suitable for the detection of temporomandibular joint involvement in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42:20110379.
  12. Talmaceanu D, Lenghel LM, Bolog N, Buduru S, Leucuta D, Rotar H. High-resolution ultrasound imaging compared to magnetic resonance imaging for temporomandibular joint disorders: an in vivo study. Eur J Radiol 2020;132:109291.
  13. Talmaceanu D, Lenghel LM, Bolog N, et al. High-resolution ultrasonography in assessing temporomandibular joint disc position. Med Ultrason 2018;1:64-70. https://doi.org/10.11152/mu-1025
  14. Thomas AE, Kurup S, Kumar SP, Chandy ML, Jose R. Diagnostic efficiency of high-resolution ultrasonography in patients with chronic temporomandibular disorders. Oral Radiol 2016;32:160-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-015-0224-6
  15. Yilmaz D, Kamburoglu K. Comparison of the effectiveness of high resolution ultrasound with MRI in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2019;48:20180349.
  16. Klatkiewicz T, Gawriolek K, Radzikowska MP, Czajka-Jakubowska A. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Monit 2018;24:812-817. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.908810
  17. Park HJ, Yu SK, Seo YS, Ryu JW. A reproducible and reliable method for measuring masseter muscle thickness in maximal bite force using ultrasonography. J Oral Med Pain 2022;47:206-211. https://doi.org/10.14476/jomp.2022.47.4.206
  18. Manfredini D, Guarda-Nardini L. Ultrasonography of the temporomandibular joint: a literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:1229-1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.07.014
  19. Ramanan D, Palla S, Bennani H, Polonowita A, Farella M. Oral behaviours and wake-time masseter activity in patients with masticatory muscle pain. J Oral Rehabil 2021;48:979-988. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13219
  20. Hosgor H. The relationship between temporomandibular joint effusion and pain in patients with internal derangement. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019;47:940-944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.03.010