DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical Utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Adolescent Restructured Form in the Assessment of Internalizing and Externalizing Disorders in Adolescents: A Preliminary Approach

  • Hye Ji Yun (Department of Psychiatry, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine) ;
  • Eun Hee Park (Department of Psychiatry, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hyun Ju Hong (Department of Psychiatry, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2023.06.13
  • Accepted : 2023.08.26
  • Published : 2023.10.01

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated whether the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Adolescent Restructured Form (MMPI-ARF) can differentiate between two groups of adolescents, one diagnosed with internalizing disorders and another with externalizing disorders, and examined the clinical utility of the MMPI-A-RF by examining which subscales can significantly discriminate between these two groups. Methods: A total of 105 adolescents aged 13-18 years completed the MMPI-A-RF (53 internalizing disorder and 52 externalizing disorder groups). Independent t-test, chi-square test (χ2), and discriminant analysis were used to examine whether MMPI-A-RF can distinguish between the two groups. Results: Sixteen MMPI-A-RF scales best predicted differences between the groups with internalizing and externalizing disorders. Fourteen scales (Higher-Order Scale [Emotional/Internalizing Dysfunction], Restructured Clinical [RC] Scale [RC demoralization, Somatic Complaints (RC1), and Low Positive Emotions (RC2)], Personality Psychopathology Five Scale [Introversion/Low Positive Emotionality-Revised, Negative Emotionality/Neuroticism-Revised], Somatic/Cognitive Scale [Malaise, Head Pain Complaints, and Gastrointestinal Complaints], Internalizing Scale [Stress/Worry, Self-Doubt], Externalizing Scale [Negative School Attitudes], Interpersonal Scale [Social Avoidance, Shyness]) were associated with the internalizing disorder group, whereas two scales (Externalizing Scale [Conduct Problems, Negative Peer Influence]) were associated with the externalizing disorder group. Conclusion: The MMPI-A-RF can be an efficient assessment tool for a quick diagnosis as it can classify individuals with internalizing and externalizing disorders in clinical settings that lack a variety of assessment tools for children and adolescents.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by Maumsarang, Co. LTD.

References

  1. Sawyer SM, Azzopardi PS, Wickremarathne D, Patton GC. The age of adolescence. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2018;2:223-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30022-1
  2. Achenbach TM, Edelbrock CS. Taxonomic issues in child psychopathology. In: Ollendick TH, Hersen M, editors. Handbook of child psychopathology. Boston, MA: Springer;1983. p.65-93.
  3. Hopwood CJ, Grilo CM. Internalizing and externalizing personality dimensions and clinical problems in adolescents. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 2010;41:398-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-010-0175-4
  4. Achenbach TM. The classification of children's psychiatric symptoms: a factor-analytic study. Psychol Monogr 1966;80:1-37. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093906
  5. Storr CL, Pacek LR, Martins SS. Substance use disorders and adolescent psychopathology. Public Health Rev 2012;34:1-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391678
  6. Lee M, Park B. The structural relationships among externalizing problems, internalizing problems, achievement value, and school adjustment in adolescents. J Learn Cent Curric Instr 2017;17:517-535.
  7. Park MH. The effect and development of anger management program for enhancement of peer relationship and social skills of children with externalized behavioral problems. J Emot Behav Disord 2013;29:45-67.
  8. Lee S, Koh I, Kim M. A study that related variables to effect preschoolers' problems behavior. Early Child Educ Res Rev 2009;13:163-183.
  9. Albayrak-Kaymak D. Internalizing or externalizing: screening for both problem youth. Int J Adv Couns 1999;21:125-137. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005412219815
  10. Lee SA, Kim KH, Yook KH. Utility of K-CBCL and MMPI-A in evaluation and diagnosis of adolescents with internalizing or externalizing disorders. Kor J Clin Psychol 2012;31:391-399. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2012.31.1.020
  11. Butcher JN, Williams CL, Graham JR, Archer RP, Tellegen A, Ben-Porath YS, et al. Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-adolescent (MMPI-A): manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press;1992.
  12. Kim JS, Han K, Lim J, Lee J, Min B, Moon K. Korean MMPI-2 user manual. Seoul: Maumsarang Inc;2005.
  13. Archer RP, Handel RW, Ben-Porath YS, Tellegen A. Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-adolescent-restructured form (MMPI-A-RF): administration, scoring, interpretation, and technical manual. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 2016.
  14. Ben-Porath YS, Tellegen A. Empirical correlates of the MMPI-2 restructured clinical (RC) scales in mental health, forensic, and nonclinical settings: an introduction. J Pers Assess 2008;90:119-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701845120
  15. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association Publishing;2013.
  16. Achenbach TM, Edelbrock CS. The classification of child psychopathology: a review and analysis of empirical efforts. Psychol Bull 1978;85:1275-1301. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.85.6.1275
  17. Han K, Lim J, Moon K, Yook K, Kim J. Korean MMPI-A-RF user manual. Seoul: Maumsarang Inc;2018.
  18. Archer RP. Assessing adolescent psychopathology: MMPI-A/MMPI-A-RF. 4th ed. New York: Routledge;2016.
  19. Betz NE. Use of discriminant analysis in counseling psychology research. J Couns Psychol 1987;34:393-403. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.34.4.393
  20. Chang IC, Hwang HG, Hung MC, Lin MH, Yen DC. Factors affecting the adoption of electronic signature: executives' perspective of hospital information department. Decis Support Syst 2007;44:350-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.04.006
  21. Hollar E. Assessing internalizing disorders with the MMPI-A-RF: clinical correlates of internalizing scales in an adolescent inpatient sample [dissertation]. New York: Pace Univ.;2019.
  22. Chakranarayan C, Weed NC, Han K, Skeel RL, Moon K, Kim JH. Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-adolescent-restructured form (MMPI-A-RF) characteristics of ADHD in a Korean psychiatric sample. J Clin Psychol 2021;78:913-925. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23269
  23. Fertitta MC. Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-adolescent- restructured form (MMPI-A-RF) with juvenile drug court adjudicated outpatient adolescents [dissertation]. Melbourne, FL: Florida Institute of Technology;2018.
  24. Park KY. Examining the measurement invariance of the MMPIA-RF externalizing scales across Korean and American adolescent normative samples [dissertation]. Norfolk, VA: Old Dominion Univ.; 2018.
  25. Park SY, Chong YS. Moderating effects of ego-resilience and social support in relations among academic achievement pressure, perceived academic stress and internalization problems in boys and girls. Korean J Dev Psychol 2010;23:17-32.
  26. McGrath EP, Repetti RL. A longitudinal study of children's depressive symptoms, self-perceptions, and cognitive distortions about the self. J Abnorm Psychol 2022;111:77-87. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.111.1.77
  27. Shin EB, Park EH, Hong HJ. Clinical utility of the MMPI-A-RF's internalization and externalization higher-order scales: comparison with the K-CBCL's internalization and externalization scales. Korean J Psychosom Med 2022;30:119-126.
  28. Kim JS. Clinical interpretation of Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory. Seoul: Seoul National University Press;1998.
  29. Lee H, Ha EH, Oh KJ. Gender differences in emotional and behavioral problems of Korean adolescents. J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2005;16:117-123.