DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Identification of druggable genes for multiple myeloma based on genomic information

  • Rahmat Dani Satria (Department of Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada) ;
  • Lalu Muhammad Irham (Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan) ;
  • Wirawan Adikusuma (Department of Pharmacy, University of Muhammadiyah Mataram) ;
  • Anisa Nova Puspitaningrum (Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan) ;
  • Arief Rahman Afief (Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan) ;
  • Riat El Khair (Department of Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada) ;
  • Abdi Wira Septama (Research Centre for Pharmaceutical Ingredients and Traditional Medicine, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN))
  • Received : 2023.02.09
  • Accepted : 2023.08.07
  • Published : 2023.09.30

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy. It is widely believed that genetic factors play a significant role in the development of MM, as investigated in numerous studies. However, the application of genomic information for clinical purposes, including diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, remains largely confined to research. In this study, we utilized genetic information from the Genomic-Driven Clinical Implementation for Multiple Myeloma database, which is dedicated to clinical trial studies on MM. This genetic information was sourced from the genome-wide association studies catalog database. We prioritized genes with the potential to cause MM based on established annotations, as well as biological risk genes for MM, as potential drug target candidates. The DrugBank database was employed to identify drug candidates targeting these genes. Our research led to the discovery of 14 MM biological risk genes and the identification of 10 drugs that target three of these genes. Notably, only one of these 10 drugs, panobinostat, has been approved for use in MM. The two most promising genes, calcium signal-modulating cyclophilin ligand (CAMLG) and histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2), were targeted by four drugs (cyclosporine, belinostat, vorinostat, and romidepsin), all of which have clinical evidence supporting their use in the treatment of MM. Interestingly, five of the 10 drugs have been approved for other indications than MM, but they may also be effective in treating MM. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the genomic variants involved in the pathogenesis of MM and highlight the potential benefits of these genomic variants in drug discovery.

Keywords

References

  1. Cowan AJ, Green DJ, Kwok M, Lee S, Coffey DG, Holmberg LA, et al. Diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma: a review. JAMA 2022;327:464-477. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.0003
  2. Bird SA, Boyd K. Multiple myeloma: an overview of management. Palliat Care Soc Pract 2019;13:1178224219868235.
  3. Ludwig H, Novis Durie S, Meckl A, Hinke A, Durie B. Multiple myeloma incidence and mortality around the globe: interrelations between health access and quality, economic resources, and patient empowerment. Oncologist 2020;25:e1406-e1413. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0141
  4. Phinyo P, Maihom T, Phanphaisarn A, Kerdsinchai P, Rattarittamrong E, Patumanond J, et al. Development of a clinical diagnostic tool to differentiate multiple myeloma from bone metastasis in patients with destructive bone lesions (MM-BM DDx). BMC Fam Pract 2020;21:215.
  5. Caers J, Garderet L, Kortum KM, O'Dwyer ME, van de Donk N, Binder M, et al. European Myeloma Network recommendations on tools for the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma: what to use and when. Haematologica 2018;103:1772-1784. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.189159
  6. Rajan AM, Rajkumar SV. Interpretation of cytogenetic results in multiple myeloma for clinical practice. Blood Cancer J 2015;5:e365.
  7. Abdallah N, Rajkumar SV, Greipp P, Kapoor P, Gertz MA, Dispenzieri A, et al. Cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma: association with disease characteristics and treatment response. Blood Cancer J 2020;10:82.
  8. Sonneveld P, Avet-Loiseau H, Lonial S, Usmani S, Siegel D, Anderson KC, et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: a consensus of the International Myeloma Working Group. Blood 2016;127:2955-2962. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-01-631200
  9. Dennis G Jr, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, Lane HC, et al. DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol 2003;4:P3.
  10. Parvaneh N, Casanova JL, Notarangelo LD, Conley ME. Primary immunodeficiencies: a rapidly evolving story. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013;131:314-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2012.11.051
  11. Fresno C, Fernandez EA. RDAVIDWebService: a versatile R interface to DAVID. Bioinformatics 2013;29:2810-2811. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt487
  12. Canafax DM, Ascher NL. Cyclosporine immunosuppression. Clin Pharm 1983;2:515-524.
  13. Sonneveld P, Durie BG, Lokhorst HM, Marie JP, Solbu G, Suciu S, et al. Modulation of multidrug-resistant multiple myeloma by cyclosporin. The Leukaemia Group of the EORTC and the HOVON. Lancet 1992;340:255-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(92)92353-H
  14. Hood K, Shah A. Belinostat for relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma. J Adv Pract Oncol 2016;7:209-218.
  15. Bubna AK. Vorinostat: an overview. Indian J Dermatol 2015;60:419.
  16. Shustov A, Coiffier B, Horwitz S, Sokol L, Pro B, Wolfson J, et al. Romidepsin is effective and well tolerated in older patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma: analysis of two phase II trials. Leuk Lymphoma 2017;58:2335-2341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2017.1295143
  17. Plumb JA, Finn PW, Williams RJ, Bandara MJ, Romero MR, Watkins CJ, et al. Pharmacodynamic response and inhibition of growth of human tumor xenografts by the novel histone deacetylase inhibitor PXD101. Mol Cancer Ther 2003;2:721-728.
  18. Desai D, Das A, Cohen L, el-Bayoumy K, Amin S. Chemopreventive efficacy of suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) against 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK)-induced lung tumorigenesis in female A/J mice. Anticancer Res 2003;23:499-503.
  19. Cohen LA, Marks PA, Rifkind RA, Amin S, Desai D, Pittman B, et al. Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, suppresses the growth of carcinogen-induced mammary tumors. Anticancer Res 2002;22:1497-1504.
  20. Butler LM, Agus DB, Scher HI, Higgins B, Rose A, Cordon-Cardo C, et al. Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, an inhibitor of histone deacetylase, suppresses the growth of prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res 2000;60:5165-5170.
  21. Frye R, Myers M, Axelrod KC, Ness EA, Piekarz RL, Bates SE, et al. Romidepsin: a new drug for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2012;16:195-204. https://doi.org/10.1188/12.CJON.195-204
  22. McGraw AL. Romidepsin for the treatment of T-cell lymphomas. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2013;70:1115-1122. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp120163
  23. Irham LM, Wong HS, Chou WH, Adikusuma W, Mugiyanto E, Huang WC, et al. Integration of genetic variants and gene network for drug repurposing in colorectal cancer. Pharmacol Res 2020;161:105203.