농업과학연구 (Korean Journal of Agricultural Science)

  • 제50권3호
  • /
  • Pages.395-406
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2466-2402(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2466-2410(eISSN)
충남대학교 농업과학연구소 (Institute of Agricultural Science, CNU)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of input-output energy use in strawberry production in single-span double-layered greenhouses with different thermal-curtain positions

  • Timothy Denen Akpenpuun (Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, University of Ilorin) ;
  • Wook-Ho Na (Smart Agriculture Innovation Centre, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Qazeem Opeyemi Ogunlowo (Department of Agricultural Civil Engineering, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Anis Rabiu (Department of Agricultural Civil Engineering, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Misbaudeen Aderemi Adesanya (Department of Agricultural Civil Engineering, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Prabhat Dutta (Department of Food Security and Agriculture Development, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Ezatullah Zakir (Department of Food Security and Agriculture Development, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Hyeon-Tae Kim (Department of Bio-Industrial Machinery, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Hyun-Woo Lee (Smart Agriculture Innovation Centre, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2023.05.26
  • 심사 : 2023.07.11
  • 발행 : 2023.09.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The large amount of energy required for successful crop production is the main challenge in greenhouse cropping systems. As a response to this challenge a comprehensive evaluation of greenhouse energy consumption was carried out in two structurally similar single-span greenhouses with different thermal curtain positions, with particular attention to energy productivity, specific energy, net energy, and energy ratio. The greenhouses are used for strawberry production. In the R-greenhouse (RGH), the thermal curtain hanged directly at the roof ridge, whereas in the Q-greenhouse (QGH), the thermal curtain was placed 5° from an imaginary vertical axis, from the middle of the roof ridge downwards to the north side of the greenhouse roof. The relevant data were recorded using standard methods. The results indicated that the energy expended in the RGH and QGH systems was 2,186.48 and 2,189.26 MJ/m2, respectively. Electricity and nitrogen fertilizer contributed the highest energy input in both greenhouses and in all seasons. The output energy was 3.12 and 3.82 MJ/m2, respectively, in RGH and QGH in season I and 4.40 and 4.87 MJ/m2 in season II. In terms of energy expended, there was no significant difference between the two greenhouses, nor between the two seasons. These results indicate that greenhouses of the size used in this investigation are not viable in terms of energy productivity, energy-use efficiency, and subsequent economic performance. However, further studies should be conducted to scale-up the information obtained from this investigation.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (IPET) through Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Convergence Technologies Program for Educating Creative Global Leader, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (717001-7). This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education [NRF-2019R1I1A3A01051739].

참고문헌

  1. Akpenpuun TD, Mijinyawa Y. 2020. Impact of a split-gable greenhouse microclimate on the yield of irish potato (Solanum tuberosum l.) under tropical conditions. Journal of Agricultural Engineering and Technology 25:54-78.
  2. Akpenpuun TD, Na WH, Ogunlowo QO, Rabiu A, Adesanya MA, Addae KS, Kim HT, Lee HW. 2021. Effect of greenhouse cladding materials and thermal screen configuration on heating energy and strawberry (Fragaria ananassa var. "Seolhyang") yield in winter. Agronomy 11:1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122498
  3. Akpenpuun TD, Ogunlowo QO, Ogundele OM, Afolabi DT, Hassan MB, Ajayi TA, Oparemi IO, Oyeniyi LJ, Olaniyan JO. 2023. Thermal environment analysis of selected polyethene cladded single-span greenhouse shapes models towards cooling needs. Nigerian Journal of Pure & Applied Sciences 36:4498-4511.
  4. Akpenpuun TD, Ogunlowo QO, Rabiu A, Adesanya MA, Na WH, Omobowale MO, Mijinyawa Y, Lee HW. 2022. Building energy simulation model application to greenhouse microclimate, covering material and thermal blanket modelling: A review. Nigerian Journal of Technological Development 19:276-286. https://doi.org/10.4314/njtd.v19i3.10
  5. Banaeian N, Omid M, Ahmadi H. 2011. Energy and economic analysis of greenhouse strawberry production in tehran province of Iran. Energy Conversion and Management 52:1020-1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.08.030
  6. Banaeian N, Omid M, Ahmadi H. 2012. Greenhouse strawberry production in Iran, efficient or inefficient in energy. Energy Efficiency 5:201-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-011-9133-7
  7. Belouz K, Nourani A, Zereg S, Bencheikh A. 2022. Prediction of greenhouse tomato yield using artificial neural networks combined with sensitivity analysis. Scientia Horticulturae 293:110666.
  8. Bolandnazar E, Keyhani A, Omid M. 2014. Determination of efficient and inefficient greenhouse cucumber producers using data envelopment analysis approach, a case study: Jiroft city in Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production 79:108-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.027
  9. Canakci M, Akinci I. 2006. Energy use pattern analyses of greenhouse vegetable production. Energy 31:1243-1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2005.05.021
  10. Canakci M, Topakci M, Akinci I, Ozmerzi A. 2005. Energy use pattern of some field crops and vegetable production: Case study for antalya region, Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management 46:655-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2004.04.008
  11. de Zwart HF. 1996. Analyzing energy-saving options in greenhouse cultivation using a simulation model. Ph.D. dissertation, Agricultural University Of Wageningen, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  12. Erdal G, Esengun K, Erdal H, Gunduz O. 2007. Energy use and economical analysis of sugar beet production in Tokat province of Turkey. Energy 32:35-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.01.007
  13. Franzluebbers AJ, Francis CA. 1995. Energy output: Input ratio of maize and sorghum management systems in eastern Nebraska. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 53:271-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(94)00568-Y
  14. Hatirli SA, Ozkan B, Fert C. 2006. Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in greenhouse tomato production. Renewable Energy 31:427-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2005.04.007
  15. Jeong HJ, Choi HG, Moon BY, Cheong JW, Kang NJ. 2016. Comparative analysis of the fruit characteristics of four strawberry cultivars commonly grown in South Korea. Horticultural Science and Technology 34:396-404. https://doi.org/10.7235/HORT.20160040
  16. Kim YS, Kim DH, Chung SO, Choi CH, Choi TH, Kim YJ. 2019. Development of an environment field monitoring system to measure crop growth. Agricultural Science Research 46:57-65. [in Korean]
  17. Kizilaslan H. 2009. Input-output energy analysis of cherries production in Tokat province of Turkey. Applied Energy 86:1354-1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.07.009
  18. Lee JN, Kim HJ, Kim KD, Kwen KB, Suh JT. 2017. Characteristics of new ever-bearing strawberry 'jangha' bred for high soluble solids contents. Horticultural Sciience and Technology 35:381-386. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.12972/kjhst.20170040
  19. Lee WS. 2014. Production of ever-bearing strawberry and production technology in Korea. Acta Horticulturae 1049:561-564.
  20. Mijinyawa Y, Osiade GI. 2011. The status of greenhouses utilization in Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences 2:561-566.
  21. Mohammadi A, Omid M. 2010. Economical analysis and relation between energy inputs and yield of greenhouse cucumber production in Iran. Applied Energy 87:191-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.07.021
  22. Mohammadi A, Rafiee S, Jafari A, Keyhani A, Mousavi-Avval SH, Nonhebel S. 2014. Energy use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of farming systems in north Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 30:724-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.012
  23. Nassiri SM, Singh S. 2009. Study on energy use efficiency for paddy crop using data envelopment analysis (dea) technique. Applied Energy 86:1320-1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.10.007
  24. Ozkan B, Akcaoz H, Fert C. 2004a. Energy input-output analysis in turkish agriculture. Renewable Energy 29:39-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(03)00135-6
  25. Ozkan B, Kurklu A, Akcaoz H. 2004b. An input-output energy analysis in greenhouse vegetable production: A case study for Antalya region of Turkey. Biomass and Bioenergy 26:89-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00080-1
  26. Park GS, Yoo HJ, Bae GH, Jeong SH, Sook PI, Choi JM. 2022. Varied light intensities in plastic house influence on the growth and nutrient uptake of seedlings in nursery and early stages after transplanting in strawberry. Agricultural Science Research 49:697-706. [In Korean].
  27. Pingali P, Smale M. 2001. Agriculture, industrialized. In Encyclopedia of biodiversity (second edition) Edited by Levin SA. pp. 85-97. Elsevier Inc., New Jersey, USA.
  28. Rabiu A, Na W, Akpenpuun TD, Rasheed A, Adesanya MA, Ogunlowo QO, Kim HT, Lee HW. 2022. Determination of overall heat transfer coefficient of greenhouse energy-saving screens using trnsys and hotbox methods. Biosystems Engineering 217:83-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.03.002
  29. Rasheed A, Kwak CS, Kim HT, Lee HW. 2020. Building energy and simulation model for analyzing energy saving options of multi-span greenhouses. Applied Science 10:6884.
  30. Rathke GW, Wienhold BJ, Wilhelm WW, Diepenbrock W. 2007. Tillage and rotation effect on corn-soybean energy balances in eastern Nebraska. Soil and Tillage Research 97:60-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2007.08.008
  31. Scholz V, Berg W, Kaulfuss P. 1998. Energy balance of solid biofuels. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 71:263-272. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1998.0325
  32. Shamshiri RR, Jones JW, Thorp KR, Ahmad D, Che Man H, Taheri S. 2018. Review of optimum temperature, humidity, and vapour pressure deficit for microclimate evaluation and control in greenhouse cultivation of tomato. International Agrophysics 32:287-302. https://doi.org/10.1515/intag-2017-0005
  33. Singh G, Singh S, Singh J. 2004. Optimization of energy inputs for wheat crop in punjab. Energy Conversion and Management 45:453-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(03)00155-9
  34. Singh H, Mishra D, Nahar NM, Ranjan M. 2003. Energy use pattern in production agriculture of a typical village in arid zone india-part ii. Energy Conversion and Management 44:1053-1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(02)00115-2
  35. Tabatabaie SMH, Rafiee S, Keyhani A, Ebrahimi A. 2013. Energy and economic assessment of prune production in Tehran province of Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production 39:280-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.052
  36. Yilmaz I, Akcaoz H, Ozkan B. 2005. An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey. Renewable Energy 30:145-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2004.06.001
  37. Yoshida Y. 2013. Strawberry production in japan: History and progress in production technology and cultivar development. International Journal of Fruit Science 13:103-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2012.697027
  38. Zakir E, Ogunlowo QO, Akpenpuun TD, Na WH, Adesanya MA, Rabiu A, Adedeji OS, Kim HT, Lee HW. 2022. Effect of thermal screen position on greenhouse microclimate and impact on crop growth and yield. Nigerian Journal of Technological Development 19:417-432. https://doi.org/10.4314/njtd.v19i4.15