DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

허리가 가는 여성의 하반신 체형 분석

Lower Body Shape Analysis of Women with a Slender Waist

  • 차수정 (국립목포대학교 패션의류학과)
  • Su Joung Cha (Dept. of Fashion & Clothing, Mokpo National University)
  • 투고 : 2023.05.26
  • 심사 : 2023.08.03
  • 발행 : 2023.10.31

초록

This study analyzed the body shape of adult women aged 20 to 59 with a waist and hip circumference difference of 22.00 cm or more to characterize the lower body shape of women with slender waist. The researchers analyzed the data using SPSS 26.0. Among the lower body measurements of women with slender waists, the waist circumference was 70.79 cm and the hip circumference was 95.25 cm, with a difference of 24.56 cm between the waist and hip circumferences. We categorized the components of a slender waist body type into four factors: lower body horizontal, lower body vertical, lower calf horizontal, and hip and crotch length. We categorized women with slender waists into four body types: slender long crane legs, short thick lamb legs, short thin ladder legs, and thick long pole legs. In their twenties, many people have slender, long-legged lower body, but as they age, they are more likely to have thicker lower bodies and short, thin ankles. Body types with slender waist had larger proportions of abdominal and hip dimensions in the width, circumference, and thickness categories based on waist dimensions than those with average or thick waists.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baek, H. Y. (2018). A study on sizing systems and grading methods reflecting variations in body shape of women by age groups[Unpublished master's thesis]. Kyung-Hee University. 
  2. Baek, H. Y., & Song, H. K. (2018). Analysis of women's jacket sizing systems of RTW brands and development of sizing systems by age groups. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 42(6), 1056-1068. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2018.42.6.1056 
  3. Cha, S. J. (2005). A study on the actual condition of brassiere wearing for girl students and comparative analysis of brassiere pattern [Unpublished master's thesis]. Sookmyung Women's University. 
  4. Cha, S. J. (2017). Classification of the lower body shape of the elderly women using 3D data: Focused on 60's women. Journal of Basic Design & Art, 18(4), 389-402. 
  5. Cha, S. J. (2021). A study on the change of lower body shape in 20's women. Journal of Basic Design & Art, 22(2), 619-630. https://doi.org/10.47294/KSBDA.22.2.43 
  6. Choi, S. L. (2015). A study on fitness improvement of skinny jeans for Korean 20's women [Unpublished master's thesis]. Chonnam National University. 
  7. Kim, E.-K. (2014). Comparative study on size and type of lower body of women in their 20s and 30s-40s: Focusing on determining problems by the phenomenon of purchasing down-aging clothes. Journal of the Korea Fashion & Costume Design Association, 16(3), 201-217. 
  8. Kim, S. (2006). A study on the ready-to wear fit of early 20s women. Design Forum 21, 9, 45-58. 
  9. Lee, B. M. (2022, April 29). 여성은 엉덩이둘레, 남성은 가슴 둘레에 성적매력 느끼는 까닭은? [Why are women sexually attracted to hip size and men to chest size?]. Maeil Business News Korea. https://www.mk.co.kr/news/it/10304983 
  10. Lee, J. H. (2023). Lower body shape classification of middleaged women: Focusing on 50-69 ages. Journal of the Korean Society of Design Culture, 29(1), 311-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.18208/ksdc.2023.29.1.311 
  11. Lee, J.-S., & Sung, S.-K. (2003). A survey on the purchase and repair of jean slacks: Target of the male and female students with in age group between 18 and 23. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 5(2), 153-158. 
  12. Lee, S. B. (2023, February 22). 여성, '이 둘레' 재보면 '비만 유전자' 보유 가능성 안다 [Women know they may carry 'obesity gene' by measuring 'around the waist']. Health Chosun. https://health.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2023/02/21/2023022101913.html 
  13. Lee, S. Y. (2020). A study on the lower body shapes of women in their 30s~50s. Journal of Basic Design & Art, 21(5), 441-458. https://doi.org/10.47294/KSBDA.21.5.32 
  14. Liu, K., Wang, J., Tao, X., Zeng, X., Brunianx, P., & Kamalha, E. (2016). Fuzzy classification of young women's lower body based on anthropometric measurement. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 55, 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2016.07.008 
  15. Luke, A., & Cooper, R. S. (2013). Physical activity does not influence obesity risk: Time to clarify the public health message. International Journal of Epidemiology, 42(6), 1831-1836. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt159 
  16. Nam, Y.-R., Choi, H.-S., & Kim, E.-K. (2013). A comparative study on the clothing wearing conditions and fit for middleaged women in their 40s and 50s. Journal of the Korea Fashion & Costume Design Association, 15(3), 137-156. 
  17. Moon, M. O. (2001). A study on the young aged women's lower body types: Correspondence lower body types by direct measurements with side and back view types from waistline to gluteal furrow line. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 25(8), 1420-1431. 
  18. Ong, H. J., & Choi, K. M. (1999). 여성복의 의류치수규격에 대한 실태조사 및 문제점 [A survey of clothing sizing issues in women's apparel]. Industrial Development Research, 5(1) 299-330. 
  19. Shin, K., & Do, W. (2020). Lower body types classification according to waist and thigh shapes in Korean woman in their 20s. Fashion & Textiles Research Journal, 22(4), 495-503. https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2020.22.4.495 
  20. Size Korea. (2021a). 8th Human dimension data [Excel]. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards. https://sizekorea.kr/human-info/meas-report?measDegree=8 
  21. Size Korea. (2021b). 제 8차 인체치수조사보고서 [8th Human dimension survey]. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards. https://sizekorea.kr/human-info/meas-report?measDegree=8 
  22. Korean Standards & Certifications. (2019). Sizing systems for female adult's garments: Requirements (KS K 0051:2019). https://www.standard.go.kr/KSCI/standardIntro/getStandardSearchView.do?menuId=919&topMenuId=502&upperMenuId=503&ksNo=KSK0051&tmprKsNo=KSK0051&reformNo=06 
  23. Wells, J. C. (2006). The evolution of human fatness and susceptibility to obesity: An ethological approach. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 81(2), 183- 205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793105006974