한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제43권5호
  • /
  • Pages.425-443
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

지역 기반 과학적 소양의 개념화와 예비교사를 위한 지역 기반 과학교육 프로그램 적용 사례

The Conceptualization of Region-Based Scientific Literacy and a Case of Implementing a Region-Based Science Education Program for Pre-Service Teachers

  • 투고 : 2023.08.21
  • 심사 : 2023.09.13
  • 발행 : 2023.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 지역 기반 과학교육의 실행을 지향하면서 교사교육 방안을 모색하고자 하였다. 이를 위해, '지역 기반 과학적 소양'을 개념화하고, 개념화 결과를 바탕으로 예비교사 대상의 지역 기반 과학교육 프로그램을 개발한 후, 참여자의 인식변화를 중심으로 소규모 적용 사례를 분석하였다. 이 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 우선, 지역 기반 과학적 소양을 네 가지 요소, 즉, "지역에 관련된 과학에 대한 이해", "'지역에 관련된 과학'과 '지역에 관련된 과학에 대한 이해'의 내장 배경에 대한 이해", "과학적 방법을 통한 지역의 문제 해결", "과학을 매개로 한 정체성 변화"로 개념화하였다. 지역 기반 과학적 소양의 개념화 결과를 바탕으로 '예비교사가 참여하는 마을탐구공동체' 프로그램을 개발하여 적용한 결과, 프로그램에 참여한 예비교사들은 첫째, 지역의 실제 문제를 찾아 해결하기 위해 다양한 방법으로 노력하였고, 그 과정에서 사회적 실천 방안을 탐색하여 실천에 옮기기도 하였다. 둘째, 지역에서 가르치기, 과학의 특성, 과학적 소양의 중요 요소, 과학적 소양의 특성, 장소감을 포함하는 지역과 교육, 지역 기반 과학교육의 필요성에 대한 예비교사들의 인식에 긍정적인 변화가 있었다. 이를 바탕으로 지역 기반 과학교육 방안을 위한 몇 가지 제언을 하였다.

This study aimed to explore teacher education methods while aiming to implement Region-based Science Education (RSE). For this, 'Region-based Science Literacy' (RSL) was conceptualized by theoretical investigation, and, based on the conceptualization results, an RSE program for pre-service teachers was developed and a small-scale application case was analyzed focusing on how participants' perceptions changed. The results of this study are as follows. First, RSL was conceptualized into four elements: (a) understanding of science related to a region, (b) understanding of the embedded backgrounds associated with 'science related to a region' and 'understanding of science related to a region', (c) solving a region's problems using scientific methods, and (d) identity changes facilitated by the mediation of science. Based on the conceptualization results of RSL, the 'Village Community of Inquiry with Pre-service Teachers' (VCoI_PT) program was developed and implemented. As a result, the pre-service teachers who participated in the program made various efforts to find and solve real problems in a region and even explored social practice methods, putting them into practice in the process. Second, even in this small-scale application, there were positive changes in the pre-service teachers' perceptions, encompassing various aspects including their views on teaching in the region, the characteristics of science, important elements of scientific literacy, characteristics of scientific literacy, the region and education including the sense of place, and the significance of RSE. Finally, several suggestions for RSE were offered.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2022년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 일반공동연구지원사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2022S1A5A2A03051438)

참고문헌

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. Washington, DC: AAAS.
  2. Avery, L. M. (2013). Rural science education: Valuing local knowledge. Theory Into Practice, 52, 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2013.743769
  3. Bailly, A. S., & Gibson, L. J. (2017). Emerging trends in regional science. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 1, 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-017-0028-2
  4. Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin'! Agency, identity, and science learning. Journal of the Learning Science, 19(2), 187-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903530044
  5. Birmingham, D., & Barton A. C. (2014). Putting on a green carnival: Youth taking educated action on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 286-314. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21127
  6. Bouillion, L. M., & Gomez, L. M. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 878-898. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1037
  7. Bybee, R. (2016). Scientific literacy. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 944-946). Springer.
  8. Chen, F., Shi, Y., & Xu, F. (2009). An analysis of the public scientific literacy study in China. Public Understanding of Science, 18(5), 607-616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508093089
  9. Chiapetta, E., Sethna, G., & Fillman, D. (1993). Do middle school life science textbooks provide a balance of scientific literacy themes? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 787-797. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300714
  10. Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
  11. Chungcheongnamdo Office of Education (2022). Comprehensive plan to support small schools in Chungcheongnam-do from 2022 to 2026. the Chungcheongnamdo Office of Education.
  12. DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 582-601. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
  13. Dewey, J. (1938), Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company, Reprinted as pp. 1-527 in John Dewey, The Later Works, 1925-1953, Volume 12: 1938, Jo Ann Boydston (Ed.), Kathleen Poulos (text. ed.), Ernest Nagel (intro.), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL, 1986.
  14. Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. F. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 261-295. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002261
  15. Engels, M., Miller, B., Squires, A., Jennewein, J. S., & Eitel, K. (2019). The Confluence Approach: Developing Scientific Literacy through Project-Based Learning and Place-Based Education in the Context of NGSS. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 23(3), 33-58.
  16. Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
  17. Engestrom, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
  18. Fives, H., Huebner, W., Birnbaum, A. S., & Nicolich, M. (2014). Developing a measure of scientific literacy for middle school students. Science Education, 98, 549-580. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21115
  19. Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
  20. Hodson, D. (1999). Going beyond Cultural Pluralism: Science Education for Sociopolitical Action. Science Education, 83, 775-796. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199911)83:6<775::AID-SCE8>3.0.CO;2-8
  21. Holland, D., & Lachicotte, W. (2007). Vygotsky, Mead, and the new sociocultural studies of identity. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wretsch (Eds.), The cambridge companion to vygotsky (pp. 101-135). Cambridge University Press.
  22. Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16, 13-16, 52.
  23. Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82, 407-416. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3<407::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-G
  24. Im, Y. -K. (2005). Establishing and Applying Teaching Standards for Rural Education. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 22(3), 27-46.
  25. Joung, Y. J. (2014). Theoretical investigation on the implications of the 'Community of Inquiry' for science education: Toward 'Community of Inquiry in Science Classroom'. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(3), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.3.0303
  26. Joung, Y. J. (2020). 'Neonadeuri' of 'Unripe' and 'Ripe': Science Learning as Heterogeneous Network. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(6), 631-648. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2020.40.6.631
  27. Joung, Y. J. (2018). Community of inquiry in science classroom. Seoul: Bookshill.
  28. Joung, Y. J. (2019). Community-based education as an alternative approach of future education. J. S. Song (Eds.). Future school eudcation: What and how to prepare (pp. 77-118). Seoul: Bookshill.
  29. Joung, Y. J., & Gunstone, R. (2010). Children's Typically-Perceived-Situations of force and no force in the context of Australia and Korea. International Journal of Science Education, 32(12), 1959-1615.
  30. Kim, C. H., Kim, B. Y., Moon, S. B., Kim, J, S., Kim, E. G., Park, J. H., Park, H. J., Lee, K. H., & Chae, J. E. (2015). A Study for development of Korean teacher competency index. Korea Educational Development Institute.
  31. Kim, G., & Lee, H. (2017a). Perceptions of Teachers, Program Instructors, and Local Experts on Implementing Community-Based Socioscientific Issues Programs. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(3), 453-464.
  32. Kim, G., & Lee, H. (2017b). Effects of Community-Based SSI Programs on Promoting Middle School Students'Understanding of Issues and Character and Values as Citizens: Focused on Fine Dust Issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(6), 911-920.
  33. Kim, J. -U. (2021). Exploring elementary school students' climate activist identity in practice in an action-oriented climate change activity. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University.
  34. Kim, Y. -L. (2015). A Theoretical approach for community-based learning: Applying principles from complexity science, social capital, and educational governance. Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 33(2), 259-287.
  35. Ko, M., & Kim, K. (2021). Analyses on the changes in the spatial distribution of Korean local extinction risk. Journal of the Korean Cartographic Association, 21(1), 65-74.
  36. Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<71::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-C
  37. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific knowledge. NJ: Princeton University Press.
  38. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  39. Latour, B. (1988). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  40. Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47, 369-381.
  41. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press.
  42. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press.
  43. Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the Actor-Network: Ordering, strategy and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830
  44. Law, J. (2009). Actor Network Theory and material semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed). The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory (141-158). West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  45. Layton, D., Davey, A., & Jenkins, E. (1986). Science for specific social purposes (SSSP): Perspectives on adult scientific literacy. Studies in in Science Education, 13, 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268608559929
  46. Lee, G. -G., & Hong, H. -G. (2022). A comparative study of scientific literacy and core competence discourses as rationales for the 21st century science curriculum reform. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 42(1), 1-18.
  47. Lee, M. (2009). Toward to the definition of 'Scientific Literacy'. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 28(4), 487-494.
  48. Lee, M. (2014). Characteristics and trends in the classifications of scientific literacy definitions. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(2), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.2.0055
  49. Lee, S. (2019). Local extinction in Korea 2018: Focusing on trends from 2013 to 2018 and population movement in non-metropolitan areas. Emplyment Trends Brief, July, 2-21. Korea Employment Information Service.
  50. Lee, S., & Roth, W. M. (2003). Science and the "good citizen": Community-based scientific literacy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 28(3), 403-424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903028003003
  51. Lee, S. -K., Shin, M. -K., & Kim, C. -J. (2008). Exploring the educational potential of the exhibits in natural history museums as socioscientific learning materials in the context of proposing science inquiry communities: Earthquake topic. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 29(6), 506-519. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2008.29.6.506
  52. Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. (Translated by M. J. Hall) Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  53. Lim, S. -E. (2003). Exploring elementary school classrooms implementing extreme citizen science education program using digital technology based on Actor-Network Theory. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University.
  54. Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  55. Liu, X. (2009). Beyond science literacy: science and the public. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 301-311.
  56. Ministry of Education (2015). The 2015 revised science curriculum. Republic of Korea.
  57. National Academy of Science. (1995). National science education standards. National Academy Press.
  58. NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For States, By States. USA: NGSS Lead States.
  59. Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224-240. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066
  60. OECD (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow's world. Volume I: Analysis. Paris: OECD.
  61. OECD (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: Transformative competencies for 2030. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/transformative-competencies/Transformative_Competencies_for_2030_concept_note.pdf.
  62. OECD. (2022). The PISA 2025 Assessment Framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2015draftframeworks.htm.
  63. Oliver, J. S. (2007). Rural Science Education. In Abell, S. K. & Lederman, N. G. (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Science Education. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  64. Osborne, J., & Pimentel, D. (2023). Science education in an age of misinformation. Science Education, 107(3), 553-571. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21790
  65. Pardales, M. J., & Girod, M. (2006). Community of Inquiry: Its past and present future. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(3), 299-309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00196.x
  66. Park, J. (2016). Discussions about the three aspects of scientific literacy: Focus on integrative understanding, settlement in curriculum, and civic education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 413-422. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.3.0413
  67. Park, N. E. (2017). Development of sense of place through village exploration. Research in Social Studies Education, 24(3), 115-130.
  68. Peirce, C. S. (1877a). The fixation of belief. Popular Science Monthly, 12 (November 1877), 1-15. In C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (Eds.) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 5 (1931-1958) (pp. 223-247). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960.
  69. Peirce, C. S. (1877b). How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly, 12 (January 1877), 286-302. In C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (Eds.) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 5 (1931-1958) (pp. 248-271). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960.
  70. Peirce, C.S. (1878). Deduction, induction, and hypothesis. Popular Science Monthly, 13, 470-482. In C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (Eds.) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 2 (1931-1958) (pp. 372-388). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960.
  71. Pella, M. O., O'Hearn, G. T., & Gale, C. W. (1966). Referents to scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4, 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660040317
  72. Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729-780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
  73. Roehl, T. (2012). From witnessing to recording-material objects and the epistemic configuration of science classes. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 20(1), 49-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.649415
  74. Roth, W. -M., & Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. Psychology Press.
  75. Roth, W. -M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88, 263-291. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10113
  76. Roth, W.-M., McGinn, M. K., Woszczyna, C., & Boutonne, S. (1999). Differential participation during science conversations: The interaction of focal artifacts, social configurations, and physical arrangements. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3&4), 293-347. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0803&4_1
  77. Shamos, M. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  78. Sjostrom, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. In Y. Dori (Ed.), Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education (pp. 65-88). Springer.
  79. Smith, J. E. (1983). The spirit of American philosophy. NY: Oxford University Press.
  80. Talisse, R. B. (2004). Towards a Peircean politics of inquiry. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 40(1), 21-38.
  81. Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press.
  82. Valladares, L. (2021). Scientific literacy and social transformation. Science & Education, 30(3), 557-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00205-2
  83. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press.
  84. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge university press.
  85. Yore, L. (2012). Science literacy for all: more than a slogan, logo, or rally flag! In K. Tan & M. Kim (Eds.), Issues and challenges in science education research (pp. 5-23). Springer.
  86. Yoon, O. (2016). Practices of place-based environmental education in a general education course for pre-service elementary teachers. The Journal of Korean Association of Geographic and Environmental Education, 24(1), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.17279/jkagee.2016.24.1.139
  87. Ziman, J. (1991). Public understanding of science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16(1), 99-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399101600106