DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyzing Elementary School Teachers' Perceptions of Carbon Neutrality Education and Their Experiences in Implementing Carbon Neutrality Education in Science Subjects

초등교사들의 탄소중립교육에 대한 인식과 과학 교과에서의 탄소중립교육 실행 경험 분석

  • Received : 2023.09.14
  • Accepted : 2023.10.01
  • Published : 2023.10.31

Abstract

This study investigated and analyzed elementary school teachers' perceptions of carbon neutrality education and their experiences in implementing carbon neutrality lessons in science education. The results showed that elementary school teachers' awareness of the relevance of carbon neutrality and climate change, the importance and necessity of carbon neutrality education, and the need for carbon neutrality education in science education are high. Elementary school teachers believe that science is a suitable subject for implementing carbon neutrality education, and that specific suggestions through curriculums and textbooks, provision of teaching and learning materials, and related training are needed to implement carbon neutrality education. Teachers who implemented carbon neutrality education in science classes either directly addressed the meaning and importance of carbon neutrality, how to achieve it, and the relevance of climate change in the overall area of the science department, or indirectly focused on the relevance of carbon neutrality to the content of science classes. They also presented examples of difficulties and solutions to carbon neutrality in science education. In this regard, the implications of implementing carbon neutrality education in science education were discussed.

본 연구는 초등학교 교사들을 대상으로 탄소중립교육에 대한 인식과 과학교육에서의 탄소중립 수업 실행 경험을 조사하고 분석하였다. 그 결과, 탄소중립과 기후변화와의 관련성, 탄소중립교육의 중요성과 필요성, 교과교육에서 탄소중립교육의 필요성에 대한 초등교사들의 인식은 높은 것으로 나타났다. 초등교사들은 탄소중립교육을 실행하기에 적합한 교과를 과학이라고 생각하고 있으며, 탄소중립교육의 실행을 위해 교육과정 및 교과서를 통한 구체적인 제시, 교수학습 자료 제공, 관련 연수가 필요하다고 하였다. 과학 수업에서 탄소중립교육을 실행한 교사들은 과학 교과의 전반적인 영역에서 탄소중립의 의미와 중요성, 실행 방법, 기후변화의 관련성에 내용 내용을 직접적으로 다루거나 과학 수업 내용과 탄소중립의 관련성에 초점을 두어 간접적으로 탄소중립교육을 실행하기도 하였다. 또한, 탄소중립 수업에서 발생한 어려움과 해결 방안에 대한 사례를 제시하였다. 이와 관련하여 과학교육에서 탄소중립교육 실행을 위한 시사점을 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Baumber, A., Luetz, J. M., & Metternicht, G. (2019). Carbon neutral education: Reducing carbon footprint and expanding carbon brainprint. Quality Education, 1-13.
  2. Campos-Seijo, B. (2020). Carbon-neutrality goals. C&EN Global Enterprise, 98(40), 4. https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-09840-editorial
  3. Chen J. (2021). Carbon neutral: Towards a sustainable future. Innovation 2, 100127-100127.
  4. Chen, L., Msigwa, G., Yang, M., Osman. A., Fawzy, S., Rooney, D., & Yap, P. (2022). Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 20, 2277-2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01435-8
  5. Cho, B., Ryu, J., Jeong, J., Kim, H., & Park, K. (2005). Survey of elementary school teacher' perceptions about environmental education. The Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-13.
  6. Cordero, E., Centeno, D., & Todd, A. (2020). The role of climate change education on individual lifetime carbon emissions. PloS one, 15(2), e0206266.
  7. Creswell, J. (2011). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Seoul, Korea: Sigma Press.
  8. Edstrand, E. (2016). Making the invisible visible: How students make use of carbon footprint calculator in environmental education. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(2), 416-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1032976
  9. Frommer, I., & Day, R. (2017). Game-A carbon emissions game. Informs Transactions on Education, 18(1), 56-70.
  10. Guzowski, M., Boake, T. M., & Wasley, J. (2010). The Carbon Neutral Design Project: Pedagogy Meets Practice. Proceedings of the 98th ACSA Annual Meeting, 294-301.
  11. Kaczmarczyk, B., & Urych, I. (2022). Perception of the transition to a zero-emission economy in the opinion of polish students. Energies, 15, 1102.
  12. Kang, E. (2022). Analysis of elementary students' perceptions on carbon neutrality. Journal of Energy and Climate Change Education, 12(3), 201-209. https://doi.org/10.22368/KSECCE.2022.12.3.201
  13. Kang, H., Yoon, H., & Lee, D. (2013). Analyses on Problems of Grade 3-4 Science Textbooks Developed for 2007 Revised National Curriculum Raised by Elementary School Teachers. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(1), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2013.32.1.022
  14. Kim, D., Lee, B., & Huh, I. (2022). A study on domestic and international climate crisis response legislation trends for 'Carbon Neutral 2050'. Hannam Journal of Law & Technology, 28(1), 95-137.
  15. Kim, Y. (2021). Carbon footprint awareness on education in connection with SDGs of the pre-service teachers. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 14(2), 146-158.
  16. Kong, F., & Wang, Y. (2022). How to understand carbon neutrality in the context of climate change? With special reference to China. Sustainable Environment, 8(1), 2062824.
  17. Kwak, Y. (2011). A study on actual conditions and ways to improve primary school science teaching. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 32(4), 422-434. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2011.32.4.422
  18. Lee, B., Lee, S., & Jo, H. (2022). Analysis of elementary and middle school students' perceptions and attitudes toward climate change. Journal of Energy and Climate Change Education, 12(2), 153-163.
  19. Lee, D., Oh, E., Kim, H., & Jeong, J. (2013). Analysis of carbon cycle concepts based on high school students' Earth system perspective. Journal of Science Education, 37(1), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2013.37.1.157
  20. Lee, J., Han, S., & Park, T. (2017). A study on the concept of carbon cycle according to spatial perception ability of high school students. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 10(3), 308-322.
  21. Lee, S., & Lee, Y. (2014). Development of a low-carbon education program for senior elementary school students to address climate change. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 27(1), 135-157.
  22. Lee, S., Choi, S., Joo, H., Lee, Y., & Park, J. (2001). The present status of subject-based environmental education in schools. Korean Journal of Environmental Education, 14(1), 107-126.
  23. Lee, S., Lee, Y., & Kim, J. (2013). Development and effect analysis of a low-carbon education program for middle-grade elementary students based on the concept of carbon footprint. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education Research, 19(2), 195-222.
  24. Lim, S., Lee, K., & Kim, S. (2022). What should science education prepare for 'carbon neutrality'? Brain, Digital, & Learning, 12, 97-117.
  25. Lin, S. (2016). Reducing students' carbon footprints using personal carbon footprint management system based on environmental behavioural theory and persuasive technology. Environmental Education Research, 22(5), 658-682. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1018142
  26. Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Portner H, Roberts, D. Skea, J., & Priyadarshi, R. (2018). Summary for policymakers. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm/. Accessed 6 Feb 2022.
  27. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015). National science curriculum No. 2015-74.
  28. Moon, B., Jeong, J., Kyung, J., Koh, Y., Youn, S., Kim, H., & Oh, K. (2004). Related conceptions to earth system and applying of systems thinking about carbon cycle of the preservice teachers. The Journal of The Korean Earth Science Society, 25(8), 684-696.
  29. Moore, A., & Derry, L. (2014). Geo ethics from the ground up: A carbon-neutral education. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts (Vol. 2014, pp. ED31C-3446).
  30. Murley, L., Gandy, S., & Huss, J. (2017). Teacher candidates research, teach, and learn in the nation's first net zero school, The Journal of Environmental Education, 48, 121-129.
  31. Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  32. Oh, P. (2011). "Unfillable Cups": Meanings of science classes to elementary school teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(2), 271-294.
  33. Oh, S., & Lee, S. (2013). The impact of carbon footprint reduction climate change education on elementary students' environmental attitudes. Korean Journal of Elementary Education, 24(1), 151-174. https://doi.org/10.20972/KJEE.24.1.201303.151
  34. Park, B., Jeon, J., Lee, H., & Lee, H. (2020). An analysis of research trend for integrated understanding of environmental issues: Focusing on science education research on carbon cycle. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(3), 237-251.
  35. Park, K., Lee, H., Lee, H., & Jeon, J. (2019). Analysis of systems thinking level of pre-service teachers about carbon cycle in earth systems using rubrics of evaluating systems thinking. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(5), 599-611.
  36. Rabaey, K., & Ragauskas, A. (2014). Editorial overview: Energy biotechnology. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 27, 5-6.
  37. Republic of Korea Policy Briefing. (2021). 2050 Carbon Neutral. https://www.korea.kr/special/policyCurationView.do?newsId=148881562
  38. Rogelj, J., den Elzen, M., Hohne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., Schaeffer, R., Sha, F., Riahi, K., & Meinshausen, M. (2016). Paris agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2℃. Nature, 534, 631-639. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18307
  39. Samaras, C., Malkakis, E., Barouti, V., & Verykios, V. (2022). Green Inspires Students (GIS. edu): A STEM educational project combining a Mobile Data Collection application with ArcGIS Online platform, towards carbon neutrality in school. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies (pp. 183-188).
  40. Sarioglan, A., & Ozkaya, O. (2021). Predict-observe-explain-do: Calculate your carbon footprint activity in distance education. Journal of Inquiry Based Activities, 11(1), 30-50.
  41. Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research. New York: Teachers College Press.
  42. Seo, W. (1999). Plans for environmental education through elementary school practical subjects. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education Research, 5(1), 73-90.
  43. Shin, W., Jeon, Y., & Shin, D. (2020). Analysis of climate change education content in the 2015 revised primary and secondary curriculum. Journal of Energy and Climate Change Education, 10(2), 121-129.
  44. Wang, F., Harindintwali, J., Yuan, Z., Wang, M., Wang, F., Li, S., Yin, Z., Huang, L., Fu, Y., Li, L., Chang, S., Zhang, L., Rinklebe, J., Yuan, Z., Zhu, Q., Xiang, L., Tsang, D., Xu, L., Jiang, X., Liu, J., Wei, N., Kastner, M., Zou, Y., Ok, Y., Shen, J., Peng, D., Zhang, W., Barcelo, D., Zhou, Y., Bai, Z., Li, B., Zhang, B., Wei, K., Cao, H., Tan, Z., Zhao, L., He, X., Zheng, J., Bolan, N., Liu, X., Huang, C., Dietmann, S., Luo, M., Sun, N., Gong, J., Gong, Y., Brahushi, F., Zhang, T., Xiao, C., Li, X., Chen, W., Jiao, N., Lehmann, J., Zhu, Y., Jin, H., Schaffer, A., Tiedje, J., & Chen, J. (2021). Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality. The Innovation, 2(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.30587/innovation.v2i1.2371
  45. Weirs, J., & Osborne, A. (2020). Refocusing sustainability education: using students' reflections on their carbon footprint to reinforce the importance of considering CO2 production in the construction industry. Frontiers in Built Environment, 6(23), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00001
  46. Yang, M., Chen, L., Msigwa, G., Tang, K., & Yap, P. (2022). Implications of COVID-19 on global environmental pollution and carbon emissions with strategies for sustainability in the COVID-19 era. Science of The Total Environment, 809(151657), 1-16.
  47. Zangori, L., Peel, A., Kinslow, A., Friedrichsen, P., & Sadler, T. (2017). Student development of model-based reasoning about carbon cycling and climate change in a socio-scientific issues unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(10), 1249-1273. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21404